Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-01T13:07:15.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Elizabeth Scott, Laurence Steinberg, David Tanenhaus, and James Backstrom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

Christopher D. Berk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Christopher Berk’s “The Troubled Foundations of Miller v. Alabama”
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 787 - 790
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Pfaff, John. Locked in: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration and How to Achieve Real Reform. New York: Basic Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. Democratic Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar