Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:21:11.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

American Capital Punishment in Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

It is often said that American capital punishment fulfills no purposes, serves no functions, and possesses no coherent rationale. In Peculiar Institution: America's Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition (2010), David Garland argues that American capital punishment is functional, meaningful, and effective, especially in the cultural realm of death penalty discourse. He also demonstrates that America's radically local version of democracy helps explain why the death penalty has persisted in the United States long after it disappeared in other Western democracies and that many of the peculiar forms through which American capital punishment is now administered have been designed to deny association with the lynchings that have occurred in American history. Garland arrives at these conclusions by comparing capital punishment in contemporary America with death penalty systems from the American past and from other Western nations. This essay argues that comparison with Asia further illuminates what is peculiar—and ordinary—in American capital punishment.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Acker, James R., and Karp, David R. 2006. Wounds That Do Not Bind: Victim‐Based Perspectives on the Death Penalty. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony G. 2001. Selling a Quick Fix for Boot Hill: The Myth of Justice Delayed in Death Cases. In The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture, ed. Sarat, Austin, 148–85. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anckar, Carsten. 2004. Determinants of the Death Penalty: A Comparative Study of the World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun. 2010. Strong Support for Death Penalty. February 9. http://www.asahi.com (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Bae, Sangmin. 2007. When the State No Longer Kills: International Human Rights Norms and Abolition of Capital Punishment. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bae, Sangmin. Forthcoming. Self‐Sufficiency, Democratic Stability and Noncompliance: When Advanced Democracies Violate International Human Rights Norms. International Studies Review. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, CA, March 26.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart. 2003. The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., De Boef, Suzanna L., and Boydstun, Amber E. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine. 2001. Crime and Control in the Culture of Late Modernity. Law & Society Review 35 (4): 899930.Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugo Adam. 2004. An Abolitionist's Survey of the Death Penalty in America Today. In Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? ed. Bedau, Hugo and Cassell, Paul, 1550. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugo, and Cassell, Paul. 2005. Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benac, Nancy. 2006. Death Penalty Trials a Painstaking Process. Associated Press/CBS News, February 27 (on file with author).Google Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1979. For Capital Punishment: Crime and the Morality of the Death Penalty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Black, Charles Jr. 1981. Capital Punishment: The Inevitability of Caprice and Mistake. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Blecker, Robert. 2004a. Facing the Music: Race Discrimination in the Death Penalty: Myth or Reality? (Unpublished paper, February 3, pp.1–14, on file with author.)Google Scholar
Blecker, Robert. 2004b. Professor Robert Blecker: Index to Faculty Profiles. New York Law School. http://www.nyls.edu/pages/347.asp (accessed December 20, 2004).Google Scholar
Blume, John, Eisenberg, Theodore, and Wells, Martin T. 2004. Explaining Death Row's Population and Racial Composition. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (1): 165207.Google Scholar
Bohm, Robert M. 2010. The Ultimate Sanction: The Collateral Damage of Capital Punishment. New York: Kaplan Publishing.Google Scholar
Clarke, Alan W., and Whitt, Laurelyn. 2007. The Bitter Fruit of American Justice: International and Domestic Resistance to the Death Penalty. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Death Penalty Information Center. 2011. Arbitrariness. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/arbitrariness (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. 2009. For Execution Methods Challenges, the Road to Abolition Is Paved with Paradox. In The Road to Abolition? The Future of Capital Punishment in the United States, ed. Ogletree, Charles J. Jr. and Sarat, Austin, 83213. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J., and Wolfers, Justin. 2005. Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate. Stanford Law Review 58 (3): 791846.Google Scholar
Dow, David R. 2010a. The Autobiography of an Execution. New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
Dow, David R. 2010b. Stevens and the Death Penalty, New York Times, December 2.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 2003. Crime, Social Order and the Rise of Neo‐Conservative Politics. Theoretical Criminology 7 (1): 111–30.Google Scholar
Fuse, Yusuke. 2009. Publicity and Secrecy Concerning Execution: Contrast between the U.S. and Japan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Philadelphia, PA, November 4.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001a. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David, ed. 2001b. Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2005. Capital Punishment and American Culture. Punishment & Society 7 (4)): 347–76.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2006. Concepts of Culture in the Sociology of Punishment. Theoretical Criminology 10 (4): 419–47.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2007a. The Peculiar Forms of American Capital Punishment. Social Research 74 (2): 435–64.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2007b. Death, Denial, Discourse: On the Forms and Functions of American Capital Punishment. In Crime, Social Control and Human Rights: From Moral Panics to States of Denial—Essays in Honour of Stanley Cohen, ed. Downes, David, Rock, Paul, Chinkin, Christine, and Gearty, Conor, 136–54. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2009. “A Culturalist Theory of Punishment?” Punishment & Society 11 (2): 259–68.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2010a. Peculiar Institution: America's Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2010b. Five Myths about the Death Penalty. Washington Post, July 18.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2011. Modes of Capital Punishment: The Death Penalty in Historical Perspective. In America's Death Penalty: Between Past and Present, ed. Garland, David, McGowen, Randall, and Meranze, Michael, 3071. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie. 2009. The Long Reach of the Carceral State: The Politics of Crime, Mass Imprisonment, and Penal Reform in the United States and Abroad. Law & Social Inquiry 34 (2): 439–72.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie. 2011. The Long Shadow of the Death Penalty: Mass Incarceration, Capital Punishment, and Penal Policy in the United States. In Is the Death Penalty Dying? European and American Perspective s, ed. Sarat, Austin and Martschukat, Jurgen, 292321. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, David F., and West, Valerie. 2008. Siting the Death Penalty Internationally. Law & Social Inquiry 33 (2): 295343.Google Scholar
Hammel, Andrew. 2010. Ending the Death Penalty: The European Experience in Global Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig. 2005. Death by Design: Capital Punishment as a Social Psychological System. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review. 2006. Note, A Matter of Life and Death: The Effect of Life‐Without‐Parole Statutes on Capital Punishment. Harvard Law Review 119:1838–54.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Peter, and Schabas, William A., eds. 2004. Capital Punishment: Strategies for Abolition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Chris. 2009. China Executions Shrouded in Secrecy. BBC News, December 29. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8432514.stm (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Hood, Roger. 1989. The Death Penalty: A World‐Wide Perspective: A Report to the United Nations Committee on Crime Prevention and Control. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger. 2001. Capital Punishment: A Global Perspective. Punishment & Society 3 (3): 331–54.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger. 2010. Abolition of the Death Penalty: Japan in World Perspective. Paper presented at Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, November 25.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger, and Hoyle, Carolyn. 2008. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2002. The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2006a. Where the State Kills in Secret: Capital Punishment in Japan. Punishment & Society 8 (3): 251–85.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2006b. Japan's Secretive Death Penalty Policy: Contours, Origins, Justifications, and Meanings. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 7 (2): 163.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2010. Capital Punishment without Capital Trials in Japan's Lay Judge System. Asia Pacific Journal 8 (52): 138. http://www.japanfocus.org/‐David_T_‐Johnson/3461 (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2011. Nihon ga Shikei o Sonchi Suru Riyu: Kokonotsu no Kasetsu”[Why Does Japan Retain Capital Punishment? Nine Hypotheses]. In Shikei to Mukiau Saibanin no tame ni[When Lay Judges Confront Capital Punishment] , ed. Fukui, Atsushi, 139–63. Tokyo: Gendai Jinbunsha.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T., and Zimring, Franklin E. 2009. The Next Frontier: National Development, Political Change, and the Death Penalty in Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Paul. J. 2006. American Exceptionalism and Racialized Inequality in American Capital Punishment. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (1): 149–75.Google Scholar
Kotlowitz, Alex. 2003. In the Face of Death. New York Times Magazine, July 6.Google Scholar
Lane, Charles. 2010. Stay of Execution: Saving the Death Penalty from Itself. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Leheny, David. 2011. The Other Rashomon Story: International Norms and Continuing Constructions of Japaneseness. In The Routledge Handbook of Japanese Politics, ed. Gaunder, Alisa, 361–71. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liebman, James S., Fagan, Jeffrey, and West, Valerie. 2000. A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973–1995. Study report, Columbia University School of Law. http://www2.law.columbia.edu/instructionalservices/liebman (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Liebman, James S., Fagan, Jeffrey, Gelman, Andrew, West, Valerie, Davies, Garth, and Kiss, Alexander. 2002. A Broken System, Part II: Why There Is So Much Error in Capital Cases and What Can Be Done About It. Study report, Columbia University School of Law. http://www2.law.columbia.edu/brokensystem2 (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. 2010. Ex‐Justice Criticizes Death Penalty. New York Times, November 27.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W., and Johnson, David T. 2009. Rocked but Still Rolling: The Enduring Institution of Capital Punishment in Historical and Comparative Perspective. In The Road to Abolition? The Future of Capital Punishment in the United States, ed. Ogletree, Charles J. Jr. and Sarat, Austin, 139–80. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
McGowen, Randall. 2011. Getting the Question Right: Ways of Thinking about the Death Penalty. In America's Death Penalty: Between Past and Present, ed. Garland, David, McGowen, Randall, and Meranze, Michael, 129. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Miethe, Terance D., Lu, Hong, and Deibert, Gini R. 2005. Cross‐National Variability in Capital Punishment: Exploring the Sociopolitical Sources of Its Different Legal Status. International Criminal Justice Review 15 (2): 115–30.Google Scholar
Monkkonen, Eric. 2005. Capital Punishment and American Culture. Punishment & Society 7 (4): 385–87.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2001. The New Abolitionism: Why Does the U.S. Practice the Death Penalty While Europe Does Not? European Studies 4 (1): 18.Google Scholar
Murakami, Haruki. 2000. The Tokyo Gas Attack and the Japanese Psyche. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2010. Comparative Criminal Justice. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2008. Death Penalty: The Political Foundations of the Global Trend Toward Abolition. Human Rights Review 9 (2): 241–68.Google Scholar
Phillips, Scott. 2008. Racial Disparities in the Capital of Capital Punishment. Houston Law Review 45 (3): 807–40.Google Scholar
Phillips, Scott. 2009a. Legal Disparities in the Capital of Capital Punishment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 99 (3): 717–56.Google Scholar
Phillips, Scott. 2009b. Status Disparities in the Capital of Capital Punishment. Law & Society Review 43 (4): 807–38.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2002. “Capital Crimes.” New Republic, April 1. http://www.tnr.com/article/capital‐crimes (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Prejean, Sister Helen. 2002. “Crusader for Life on Death Row.” Japan Times, July 8 (interview by Masami Ito).Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 2001. When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Ogletree, Charles Jr. 2006. From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State: Race and the Death Penalty in America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Boulanger, Christian, eds. 2005. The Cultural Lives of Capital Punishment: Comparative Perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Martschukat, Jurgen, eds. 2011. Is the Death Penalty Dying? European and American Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2002. The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spierenburg, Pieter. 2011. The Green, Green Grass of Home: Capital Punishment and the Penalty System from a Long‐Term Perspective. In Is the Death Penalty Dying? European and American Perspectives, ed. Sarat, Austin and Martschukat, Jurgen, 1746. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol S. 2002. Capital Punishment and American Exceptionalism. Oregon Law Review 81 (1): 97130.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol S., and Steiker, Jordan M. 1995. Sober Second Thoughts: Reflections on Two Decades of Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment. Harvard Law Review 109 (2): 355438.Google Scholar
Stevens, John Paul. 2010. On the Death Sentence. New York Review of Books, December 23. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/dec/23/death‐sentence (accessed May 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael. 2009. Explanations of American Punishment Policies: A National History. Punishment & Society 11 (3): 377–94.Google Scholar
Trevaskes, Susan. 2010. Policing Serious Crime in China: From “Strike Hard” to “Kill Fewer.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turow, Scott. 2003. Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Unnever, James D., and Cullen, Francis T. 2010. Racial‐Ethnic Intolerance and Support for Capital Punishment: A Cross‐National Comparison. Criminology 48 (3): 831–64.Google Scholar
Von Drehle, David. 2006. Among the Lowest of the Dead: The Culture of Capital Punishment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Welsh‐Huggins, Andrew. 2009. No Winners Here Tonight: Race, Politics, and Geography in One of the Country's Busiest Death Penalty States. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. 2003. Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. 2005. Capital Punishment and American Culture. Punishment & Society 7 (4): 389–96.Google Scholar
Zedner, Lucia. 2002. Dangers of Dystopias in Penal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2): 341–66.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. 2003. The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. 2005. Path Dependence, Culture, and State‐Level Execution Policy. Punishment & Society 7 (4): 377–84.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E., and Hawkins, Gordon. 1986. Capital Punishment and the American Agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E., and Johnson, David T. Forthcoming. The Light at the Top of the Stairs: Some Manifest and Latent Impacts of Capital Punishment on Criminal Sentencing. In Oxford Handbook on Sentencing and Corrections, ed. Peterselia, Joan and Reitz, Kevin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, 1980 IR 267 (1980).Google Scholar
Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008).Google Scholar
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).Google Scholar
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).Google Scholar
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).Google Scholar
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991).Google Scholar