Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:48:34.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authority by the Numbers: Porter on Quantification, Discretion, and the Legitimation of Expertise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Wendy Nelson Espeland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , Fall 1997 , pp. 1107 - 1133
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1970. The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Melamed., A. D. 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85: 1089–1128.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce G. 1994. When Is the State Autonomous? Culture, Organization Theory, and the Political Sociology of the State. Sociological Theory 12: 19–44.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce, and Espeland, Wendy Nelson. 1991. Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry Bookkeeping and the Emergence of Economic Rationality. American Journal of Sociology 97: 31–69.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost, journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–34.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry. 1985. Changing Order. Los Angeles: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Darnell, Alfred. 1990. Creating Political and Cultural Order: State Policies and Ethnic Response. In Alaska. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 1995. Building the Law and Putting the State into Play: International Strategies among Mexico's Divided Elite. Working Paper #9509, American Bar Foundation, Chicago, Ill .Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 1996. Dealing in Virtue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1991. Introduction to The New InstitutionaJism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J., 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1984. Forward: The Court and the Economic System. Harvard Law Review 98: 4–60.Google Scholar
Eisner, Marc Allen. 1991. Antitrust and the Triumph of Economics: Institutions, Expertise, and Policy Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy. 1984. Blood and Money: Exploiting the Embodied Self. In The Existential Self in Society, ed. Kotarba, Joseph and Fontana, Andrea, 131–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy. 1992. Contested Rationalities: Commensuration and the Representation of Valu. In Public Choice. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy. 1993. Power, Policy, and Paperwork: The Bureaucratic Representation of Interests. Qualitative Sociology 16: 297–317.Google Scholar
Finn, Terrence T. 1973. Conflict and Compromise: Congress Makes a Law—The Passage of the National Environmental Policy Act. Ph.D. diss., Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1977. Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1992. Law and Objectivity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Rejwesenting and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Carruthers, Bruce. 1993. Redistributing Property and Jurisdictional Rights across the Public-Private Frontier: Professions and Bankruptcy Reforms in Britain and the United States. Droit et Société: Revue Internationale de Théorie du Droit de Sociologie Juridique 23/24: 79–113.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh A. 1977. Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh A., and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1974. The Private Government of Public Money: Community and Policy inside British Politics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. 1996. Explaining Variation in the Impact of Law: Organizations, Institutions, and Professions. Law, Politics, and Society 15: 29–59.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward O. 1982. Chicago Lawyers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1989. The Problem of Rationality in American Health and Safety Regulation. In Expert Evidence: Interpreting Science in the Law, ed. Smith, Roger and Wynne, Brian, 151–83. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalberg, Stephen. 1980. Max Weber's Types of Rationality. American Journal of Sociology 85: 1145–79.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1981. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Entitlement Problems: A Critique. Stanford Law Review, February, 387–445.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kula, Witold. 1986. Measures and Men. Trans. Szreter, Richard. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald. 1986. The Flight from Ambiguity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Liroff, Richard A. 1976. A National Policy for the Environment: NEPA and Its Aftermath. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Neckerman, Kathryn, and Kirschenman, Joleen. 1991. We'd Love to Hire Them, But …: The Meaning of Race fot Employers. In The Urban Underclass, ed. Jencks, Christopher H. and Peterson, Paul E., 203–32. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert. 1988. Partners with Power. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1986. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1992. Law That Does Not Fit Society: Sentencing Guidelines as a Neo-classical Reaction to the Dilemmas of Substantivized Law. American Journal of Sociology 97: 1346–81.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1988. The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices. Law and Society Review 22: 771–800.Google Scholar
Stechl, Peter. 1969. Biological Standardization of Drugs before 1928. Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison .Google Scholar
Stryker, Robin. 1989. Limits on Technocratization of the Law: The Elimination of the National Labor Relations Board's Division of Economic Research. American Sociological Review 54: 341–58.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1994. Incommensurability and Valuation in Law. Michigan Law Review 92: 779–861.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 1985. The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Eeamames and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Lawrence. 1985. Constitutional Calculus: Equal Justice or Economic Efficiency Harvard Law Review 98: 592–629.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar