Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:54:45.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Diana Kapiszewski  and
Matthew M. Taylor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public authorities' compliance with judicial dictates is central to legality and constitutionality, may influence broader policy and political outcomes, and can have powerful feedback effects on judicial decision making, independence, and power. As such, it has crucial implications for interbranch relations and the rule of law. Effectively measuring compliance with judicial rulings and clearly explaining when and why elected leaders adhere to courts' mandates present a range of inferential challenges. Building on the groundwork laid in the burgeoning literature on the topic, this article advances two analytic frameworks (one for measuring and one for explaining compliance), offers strategies for grappling with the problems of descriptive and causal inference that arise in studying compliance, and advocates the use of multiple analytic methods to generate and test hypotheses regarding compliance.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , Fall 2013 , pp. 803 - 835
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 95 (3): 529–546.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jeb, and Weller, Nicholas. 2011. Rethinking the Process of Process Tracing: Selecting Pathway Cases in a World of Causal Complexity. Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, March 30–April 2, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1976. Implementation of Judicial Decisions. American Politics Research 4 (1): 86–114.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1977. Judicial Impact as a Form of Policy Implementation. In Public Law and Public Policy, ed. Gardiner, John A. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1978. Lower‐Court Response to Supreme Court Decisions—Reconsidering a Negative Picture. Justice System Journal 3:208–219.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1981. Comparing the Implementation of Legislative and Judicial Policies. In Effective Policy Implementation, Mazmanian, Daniel A. and Sabatier, Paul A., eds., 42–76. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2008. American Courts: Process and Policy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Beatty, Jerry K. 1972. State Court Evasion of United States Supreme Court Mandates during the Last Decade of the Warren Court. Valparaiso Law Review 6:260–285.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2012. Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices. Paper presented at the Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool Authors' Workshop, March 2–3, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bergman, Marcelo. 2009. Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin America: The Political Culture of Cheating and Compliance in Argentina and Chile. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs‐Merrill Company.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., Hofmann, Tobias, and Sprungk, Carina. 2003. Why Do States Not Obey the Law? Paper presented at the EUSA Conference, March 27–30, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet, and Jones, Bradford S. 1997. Time Is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1414–1461.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, eds. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Second Edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M. 2010. Solving the Problem of (Non)compliance in SE Rights Litigation. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Enforcement of ESC Rights Judgments, May 6–7, in Bogotá, Colombia.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M. 2011. “Faithful Servants of the Regime”: The Brazilian Constitutional Court's Role under the 1988 Constitution. In Courts in Latin America, Helmke, Gretchen and Ríos‐Figueroa, Julio, eds., 128–153. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., and Botero, Sandra. 2010. Inequality and the Rule of Law: Ineffective Rights in Latin American Democracies. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, September 2–5, 2010, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L. 1992. The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 635–664.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L. 1995. The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support. American Political Science Review 89:356–376.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. 1973. Reactions of State Supreme Courts to a US Supreme Court Civil Liberties Decision. Law and Society Review 8:109–134.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. 1991. Courts and Policy: Compliance, Implementation, and Impact. In The American Courts: A Critical Assessment, Gates, John B. and Johnson, Charles A., eds., 435–466. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Johnson, Charles A. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni C., and Freeden, Michael. 2006. Multi‐Method Research in Comparative Politics and Political Theory. Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, No. 9.Google Scholar
Cardenas, Sonia. 2007. Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2005. Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes. Journal of Politics 67 (3): 669–689.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2009. A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems. Journal of Politics 71:55–69.Google Scholar
Castillejos‐Aragón, Mónica. Forthcoming. The Emergence of a Powerful Supreme Court in Mexico. Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2): 175–205.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2009. The Separation of Powers, Court‐Curbing and Judicial Legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 971–989.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 2003. Thoughts on Goldilocks and Judicial Independence. Ohio State Law Journal 64:195–219.Google Scholar
Creyke, Robin, and McMillan, John. 2004. The Operation of Judicial Review in Australia. In Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Hertogh, Marc and Halliday, Simon, eds., 161–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision‐Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy‐Maker. Journal of Public Law 6:279–295.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind. 2007. Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong‐Form versus Weak‐Form Judicial Review Revisited. International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (3): 391–418.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles C. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2001. The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government. Law & Society Review 35 (1): 117–164.Google Scholar
Erard, Brian, and Feinstein, Jonathan S. 1994. Honesty and Evasion in the Tax Compliance Game. Rand Journal of Economics 25 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
ESCR‐Net. 2009. Enforcement of Judgments on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Towards a Theory and Practice. Concept Note prepared for the International Symposium on Enforcement of ESC Rights Judgments, May 6–7, Bogotá, Colombia.Google Scholar
Etienne, Julien. 2011. Compliance Theory: A Goal Framing Approach. Law and Policy 33: page numbers unavailable.Google Scholar
Faundez, Julio. 2005. Democratization through Law: Perspectives from Latin America. Democratization 12 (5): 749–765.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., and Rubin, Edward L. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John A., and Weingast, Barry. 1992. A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation. International Review of Law and Economics 12:263–279.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun, and Brinks, Daniel M., eds. 2008. Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 2011. Dialogic Justice in the Enforcement of Social Rights. In Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health? Gloppen, Siri and Yamin, Alicia, eds., 232–245. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance. Law & Society Review 23 (3): 469–496.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 1995. The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice. American Journal of Political Science 39:459–489.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and A. Baird, Vanessa. 1998. On the Legitimacy of National High Courts. American Political Science Review 92:343–358.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gloppen, Siri. 2006. Courts and Social Transformation: An Analytic Framework. In Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor? Gargarella, Roberto, Domingo, Pilar, and Roux, Theunis, eds., 35–60. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2008. Concepts, Theories, and Numbers: A Checklist for Constructing, Evaluating, and Using Concepts or Quantitative Measures. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David, eds., 97–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gruhl, John. 1980. The Supreme Court's Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts. Western Political Quarterly 33:502–519.Google Scholar
Gruhl, John. 1981. Anticipatory Compliance with Supreme Court Rulings. Polity 14 (2): 294–313.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. 1961. Federalist #78. In The Federalist Papers, Rossiter, Clinton, ed. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Staton, Jeffrey K. 2011. The Puzzle of Judicial Politics in Latin America: A Theory of Litigation, Judicial Decisions, and Inter‐Branch Conflict. In Courts in Latin America, Helmke, Gretchen and Ríos‐Figueroa, Julio, eds., 306–331. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2008. Assessing the New Constitutionalism. Comparative Politics 40 (2): 227–245.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2011. Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter‐American Court's Struggle to Enforce Human Rights. Cornell International Law Journal 44 (3): 101–155.Google Scholar
Jackman, Simon. 2008. Measurement. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David, eds., 119–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Charles A., and Canon, Bradley C. 1984. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Richard M. 1967. The Dynamics of Compliance: Supreme Court Decision‐Making from a New Perspective. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, David, and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2010. Causal Explanation and Multi‐Method Research in the Social Sciences. Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Landes, William, and Posner, Richard. 1975. The Independent Judiciary in an Interest Group Perspective. Journal of Law and Economics 18:875–902.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2004. Judicial Impact: The Policy Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 15, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. Nested Analysis as a Mixed‐Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review 90 (2): 435–452.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2010. After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research. World Politics 62 (1): 120–147.Google Scholar
Marcus, Gilbert, and Budlender, Steve. 2008. A Strategic Evaluation of Public Interest Litigation in South Africa. New York: Atlantic Philanthropies.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa. 2009. Against Compliance. Paper presented at the Wisconsin International Relations Colloquium, December, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Mbazira, Christopher. 2008. You Are the “Weakest Link” in Realising Socio‐Economic Rights: Goodbye—Strategies for Effective Implementation of Court Orders in South Africa. Socio‐Economic Rights Project Research Series 3. Bellville, South Africa: Community Law Centre, University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNollgast. 2006. Conditions for Judicial Independence. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 15:105–128.Google Scholar
Muir, William K. Jr. 1967. Prayer in the Public Schools: Law and Attitude Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies Feb.:5–34.Google Scholar
Paulson, Colter. 2004. Compliance with Final Judgments of the International Court of Justice since 1987. American Journal of International Law 98 (3): 434–461.Google Scholar
Perez‐Liñán, Aníbal, and Castagnola, Andrea. 2009. Presidential Control of High Courts in Latin America: A Long‐Term View (1904–2006). Journal of Politics in Latin America 1 (2): 87–114.Google Scholar
Pillay, Kameshni. 2002. Implementing Grootboom: Supervision Needed. ESR Review: Economic and Social Rights in South Africa 3 (1): 13–14.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles. 1994. Constructing Social Research: The Unity and Diversity of Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles. 2000. Fuzzy‐Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark. 1994. The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach. Journal of Legal Studies 23:721–747.Google Scholar
Rodríguez‐Garavito, César. 2011. Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Social and Economic Rights in Latin America. Texas Law Review 89 (7): 1669–1698.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roux, Theunis. 2009. Principle and Pragmatism on the Constitutional Court of South Africa. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7:106–138.Google Scholar
Santiago, Alfonso. 1998. La Corte Suprema y el control politico. Buenos Aires: Abaco.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2011. Comparative Constitutional Compliance: Notes Towards a Research Agenda. Paper prepared for the Comparative Constitutional Law Roundtable, George Washington University Law School, March 4, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2010. The Limits to Bureaucratic Measurement: Observation and Judgment in Comparative Political Data Development. Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, 47 (December).Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2004. A Realpolitik Defense of Social Rights. Texas Law Review 82:1921–1961.Google Scholar
Schulte, Constanze. 2004. Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason. Forthcoming. Multi‐Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. Separation‐of‐Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 28–44.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2000. International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs. American Political Science Review 94 (4): 819–835.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2002. Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Institutions and Territorial Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (6): 829–856.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., and Sheehan, Reginald S. 1990. Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals. Western Political Quarterly 43 (2): 297–316.Google Scholar
Spriggs, James F. II, . 1997. Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions. Political Research Quarterly 50 (3): 567–593.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2004. Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Mérida. Comparative Politics 37:41–60.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2006. Constitutional Review and Selective Promotion of Case Results. American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 98–112.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Moore, Will H. 2011. Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics. International Organization 65 (3): 553–587.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Vanberg, George. 2008. The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions. American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 504–519.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2004. Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Power. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 20 (2): 379–399.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2002. Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. International Organization 56 (3): 609–643.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal. 1993. Courts and Crisis Regimes: A Theory Sketch with Asian Case Studies. Political Research Quarterly 46 (2): 311–338.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal. 2008. Legal Policy Making and Its Importance. Unpublished mimeo in authors' possession.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Vallinder, Torbjörn. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power: The Judicialization of Politics. In The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, Tate, C. Neal and Vallinder, Torbjörn, eds., 1–10. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2009. Curbing the Courts: A Model of Judicial Independence with Illustration from Chavez's Venezuela. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 1–4, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Toma, Eugenia F. 1996. A Contractual Model of the Voting Behavior of the Supreme Court: The Role of the Chief Justice. International Review of Law and Economics 16 (4): 433–448.Google Scholar
Trochev, Alexei. 2008. Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2004. Enhancing Police Legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593:84–99.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Huo, Yuen J. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Rasinski, Kenneth. 1991. Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular US Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson. Law & Society Review 25 (3): 621–630.Google Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo. 2004. The Constitutional Court and Control of Presidential Extraordinary Powers in Colombia. In Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Roberto, and Skaar, Elin, eds., 46–69. London: Frank Cass Publishers.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. Legislative‐Judicial Relations: A Game‐Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review. American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 346–361.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wasby, Stephen. 1970. The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Wasby, Stephen. 1973. The Communication of the Supreme Court's Criminal Procedure Decisions: A Preliminary Mapping. Villanova Law Review 18:1086.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–263.Google Scholar
Wickeri, E. 2004. Grootboom's Legacy: Securing the Right to Access to Adequate Housing in South Africa. Center for Human Rights and Global Justice Working Paper, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Series No. 5.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, Stuart. 2009. Breaking the Tie: Evictions from Private Land, Homelessness and a New Normality. South African Law Journal 126 (2): 270–290.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al., 347 US 483 (, Appeal from the US District Court for the District of Kansas, decided by the US Supreme Court on May 17, 1954.Google Scholar
Chocobar, Sixto C. v. Caja Nacional de Previsión para el Personal del Estado y Servicios Públicos s/reajuste por movilidad, decided by the Argentine Supreme Court on December 27, 1996.Google Scholar
Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v. Grootboom and Others 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC), decided by the South African Constitutional Court on October 4, 2000.Google Scholar