Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:39:55.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internal Contradictions of Judicial Mediation in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kwai Hang Ng  and
Xin He
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Judicial mediation in China represents an extreme case of integration between adjudication and mediation. Based on ethnographic work and extensive interviews, this article studies how judicial mediation actually works in China. It finds that the incorporation of mediation as part of the official trial process creates a set of internal contradictions. In addition to the role conflict inherent in a judge's acting also as a mediator, adjudication and mediation stages are organized by different principles. When the rather rigid format of adjudication is carried over to in‐trial mediation, it curtails the flexible, nonlegalistic approach that mediation is meant to promote. Challenged authority, an uncontrolled process, narrowed issues, and weakened norms all make a settled outcome difficult to achieve. In comparison with judicial mediation in other jurisdictions, this case study from China has important theoretical implications for understanding the limits of informal justice.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Spring 2014 , pp. 285 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research is funded by the Chiang Ching‐kuo Foundation Research Grant and the UC Pacific Rim Research Grant. Xin He also acknowledges the financial support from a GRF grant from the Hong Kong government. Special thanks go to the Chinese judges who helped arrange our fieldwork investigations and those who kindly agreed to be interviewed. We are also grateful for the comments of the anonymous reviewers of Law & Social Inquiry.

References

Abel, Richard L. 1982. The Contradictions of Informal Justice. In The Politics of Informal Justice, Vol. 1: The American Experience, ed. Abel, Richard L. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold S. 1983. Justice Without Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian M. 1976. Power: An Economic Analysis. In Power and Political Theory: Some European Perspectives, ed. Barry, Brian M., 222–269. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chen, Feng, and Xu, Xin 2011. “Active Judiciary”: Judicial Dismantling of Workers' Collective Action in China. China Journal 67:87–107.Google Scholar
China Law Yearbook, 2003–2011. Beijing: China Law Yearbooks Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Donald 1991. Dispute Resolution in China. Journal of Chinese Law 5:245–296.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jerome A. 1966. Chinese Mediation on the Eve of Modernization. California Law Review 54:1201–1226.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jerome A. 1997. Reforming China's Civil Procedure: Judging the Courts. American Journal of Comparative Law 45 (4): 793–804.Google Scholar
Colatrella, Michael T. Jr. 2000. “Court‐Performed” Mediation in the People's Republic of China: A Proposed Model to Improve the United States Federal District Courts' Mediation Programs. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 15:391–423.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 2005. Just Words: Law, Language and Power, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Court of Quebec. 2012. The Settlement Conference in Civil Cases. http://www.tribunaux.qc.ca/mjq_en/c‐quebec/Modes_alternatifs_de_reglement_anglais/fs_depliant_civil_ang.html (accessed August 7, 2012).Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert, and Cloatre, Emilie 2006. Vanishing Trial? An English Perspective. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1:51–70.Google Scholar
Fan, Yu. 2005. Guanyu fayuan tiaojie de shizheng yanjiu [Empirical Analysis to Juridical Mediation]. In Falü chengxu yunzuo de shizheng fenxi [An Empirical Analysis to Practice of Legal Procedures], ed. Yaxin, Wang Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar
Farrow, Trevor C. W. 2010. Civil Justice, Privatization and Democracy. http://papers.ssrn.com.eproxy1.lib.hku.hk/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1795407 (accessed 25 April 2012).Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin 1980–1981. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. … Law and Society Review 15:631–654.Google Scholar
Ficks, Erik 2008. Models of General Court‐Connected Conciliation and Mediation for Commercial Disputes in Sweden, Australia, and Japan. Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht/Journal of Japanese Law 25:131–152.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter 1992. The Impossibility of Popular Justice. Social & Legal Studies 1:199–215.Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing 2003. The Politics of Mediation in a Chinese Country: The Case of Luo Lianxi. Australian Journal of Asian Law 5:107–127.Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing, and Cullen, Richard 2011. From Mediatory to Adjudicatory Justice: The Limits of Civil Justice Reform in China. In Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China, ed. Woo, Margaret Y. K. and Gallagher, Mary E., 25–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Funken, Katja 2002. Comparative Dispute Management: Court‐Connected Mediation in Japan and Germany. German Law Journal 3. http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=130 (accessed May 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Funken, Katja 2003. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Japan. Working Paper 24, University of Munich School of Law.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 1985. A Settlement Judge, Not a Trial Judge: Judicial Mediation in the United States. Journal of Law and Society 12:1–18.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 1986. The Emergence of the Judge as a Mediator in Civil Cases. Judicature 69 (5): 257–262.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 2004. The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (3): 459–570.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela C. 1991. Dispute Resolution Without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument. American Sociological Review 56 (December): 818–835.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela C. 1995. The Problematics of Representation in Community Mediation Hearings: Implications for Mediation Practice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 12 (4): 23–46.Google Scholar
Hand, Keith J. 2011. Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China. University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review 7 (1): 51–159.Google Scholar
He, Xin 2009. Routinization of Divorce Practice in China: Institutional Constraints' Influence on Judicial Behavior. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family 23:83–109.Google Scholar
He, Xin, and Ng, Kwai Hang 2013a. In the Name of Harmony: The Erasure of Domestic Violence in China's Judicial Mediation. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family 27 (1): 97–115.Google Scholar
He, Xin, and Ng, Kwai Hang 2013b. Pragmatic Discourse and Gender Inequality in China. Law and Society Review 47 (2): 279–310.Google Scholar
He, Xin, and Ng, Kwai Hang Forthcoming. Inquisitorial Adjudication and Institutional Constraints in Chinese Civil Justice. Law and Policy.Google Scholar
Hogan, Michael 1991. Judicial Settlement Conferences: Empowering the Parties to Decide Through Negotiation. Willamette Law Review 27:429–462.Google Scholar
Huang, Philip C. 2010. Chinese Civil Justice, Past and Present. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Iwai, Nobuaki 1990–1991. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Court: The Japanese Experience. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 6:201–242.Google Scholar
Iwai, Nobuaki 1991. The Judge as Mediator: The Japanese Experience. Civil Justice Quarterly 10:108–123.Google Scholar
Jiang, Lina 2010. 辽河两级法院民事调解案件履行情况的统计分析 [Statistical Analysis of the Enforcement of Settled Civil Cases of Two Levels of Liaohe Courts]. http://www.lhfy.com.cn/shownews.asp?id=347&BigClass=%C9%F3%C5%D05%D1%D0%BE%BF (accessed May 24, 2012).Google Scholar
Kolb, Deborah M. 1983. The Mediators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 2004. Disappearing Trials? A Comparative Perspective Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (3): 735–754.Google Scholar
Li, Jie 2008. Tiaojielü shuoming shenme? Dui tiaojielü yu hexie zhengxiangguan mingti de fenxi [What Does Settlement Rate Mean? An Analysis on the Assumption that Settlement Rate Reflects Harmony]. Falü Shiyong [Journal of Law Application] 10:49–54.Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley 1967. Mao and Mediation: Politics and Dispute Resolution in Communist China. California Law Review 55:1284–1359.Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley 1997. Dispute Resolution in China After Deng Xiaoping: Mao and Mediation Revisited. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 11:229–392.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn, and Yngvesson, Barbara 1980–1981. Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes. Law and Society Review 15:775–821.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig A., and Maiman, Richard J. 1984. Mediation in Small Claims Court: Achieving Compliance Through Consent. Law and Society Review 18 (1): 11–50.Google Scholar
Menkel‐Meadow, Carrie 1985. For and Against Settlement: Uses and Abuses of the Mandatory Settlement Conference. UCLA Law Review 33:485–514.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 1982. The Social Organization of Mediation in Nonindustrial Societies: Implications for Informal Community Justice in America. In The Politics of Informal Justice, Vol. 2, ed. Abel, Richard L., 17–42. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 1992. Sorting Out Popular Justice. Social and Legal Studies 1:161–176.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, and Milner, Neal, eds. 1993. The Possibility of Popular Justice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl 2011. China's Turn Against Law. American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (4): 935–984.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura 1992. Trading Justice for Harmony. National Institute for Dispute Resolution Forum Winter:12–14.Google Scholar
Otis, Louise, and Reiter, Eric H. 2006. Mediation by Judges: A New Phenomenon in the Transformation of Justice. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 6 (3): 351–403.Google Scholar
Palmer, Michael 2009. Compromising Courts and Harmonizing Ideologies: Mediation in the Administrative Chambers of the People's Courts in the People's Republic of China. In New Courts in Asia, ed. Harding, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope, 251–276. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pavlich, George 1996. The Power of Community Mediation: Government and Formation of Self‐Identity. Law and Society Review 30:707–733.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall 2002. China's Long March Toward Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peng, Shizhong 2011. Nengdong sifa shiyexia minshi tiaojie gaige de jingxiang xuanze [Paths of the Civil Mediation Reform from Judicial Activism Perspective]. Jinan xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Jinan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)] 1:52–58.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith 1982. Managerial Judges. Harvard Law Review 96:374–448.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith 1995. Many Doors? Closing Doors? Alternative Dispute Resolution and Adjudication. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 10:211–265.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith 2000. Trial as Error, Jurisdiction as Injury: Transforming the Meaning of Article III. Harvard Law Review 113:924–1037.Google Scholar
Robert, Michel 2006. Judges as Mediators in Criminal Matters: The Canadian Experience. Speech given at the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law 20th International Conference. http://www.isrcl.org/Papers/2006/Robert.pdf (accessed August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter 2006. Adding Judicial Mediation to the Debate About Judges Attempting to Settle Cases Assigned to Them for Trial. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2006:335–382.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo 2006. What We Know and What We Should Know About American Trial Trends. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2006:35–50.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S., and Merry, Sally E. 1986. Mediator Settlement Strategies. Law and Policy 8 (1): 7–32.Google Scholar
Stipanowich, Thomas 2004. ADR and the “Vanishing Trial”: The Growth and Impact of “Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (3): 843–912.Google Scholar
Su, Yang, and He, Xin 2010. Street as Courtroom: State Accommodation of Social Conflicts in South China. Law and Society Review 44:157–184.Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence, and Ozawa, Connie 1991. Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector. In Negotiation Theory and Practice, ed. Breslin, J. William and Rubin, Jeffrey Z., 401–418. Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.Google Scholar
Tornquist, Leroy 1989. The Active Judge in Pretrial Settlement: Inherent Authority Gone Awry. Willamette Law Review 25:743–773.Google Scholar
Wang, Liming 2009. Characteristics of China's Judicial Mediation System. Asia Pacific Law Review (Special Issue on Mediation) 17:67–74.Google Scholar
Waye, Vicki, and Xiong, Ping 2011. The Relationship Between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings in China. Asian Journal of Comparative Law 6 (1): 29–60.Google Scholar
Wu, Zhi 2009. Litigation Mediation for Intellectual Property Disputes in Chinese Local Courts: Experiences and Contradictions Asia Pacific Law Review 17:117–131.Google Scholar
Xu, Xin 2006. Jiufen jiejue yu shehui hexie [Dispute Resolution and Social Harmony]. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, Suli 2010. Guanyu nengdong sifa yu datiaojie [On Judicial Activism and Grand Mediation]. Zhongguo faxue [China Legal Science] 1:5–16.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Adrian A. S. 1996. Lord Woolf's Access to Justice: Plus ça Change. … Modern Law Review 59:773–796.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Adrian A. S. 2009. The Challenge of Civil Justice Reform: Effective Court Management of Litigation. City University of Hong Kong Law Review 1 (1): 49–71.Google Scholar