Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:01:39.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers' Duty to Do Justice: A New Look at the History of the 1908 Canons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Susan D. Carle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines a long-forgotten controversy about lawyers' duties to evaluate the justice of their clients' causes in civil cases that took place among the members of the Committee of the American Bar Association (ABA) that drafted the 1908 Canons of Professional Responsibility. The article presents an analysis of newly discovered internal working documents of this important, but never before examined, ABA committee, supplemented with primary historical research into the views and backgrounds of the committee's members. The article demonstrates how a clash of perspectives among these men—traceable in part to their backgrounds but also to their unpredictable allegiances to conflicting trends in legal thought at the turn of the century—prevented the committee from reaching a satisfactory resolution on the duty's to-do-justice issue. The committee members instead adopted ineffectual compromise language in the Canons, leaving us with a legacy of concealed ambivalence on the question of lawyers' “duty to do justice” in civil cases.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , Winter 1999 , pp. 1 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, Everett V. 1902. Some Actual Problems of Professional Ethics. Harvard Law Review 15:714–24.Google Scholar
Abbot, Everett V. 1913. Justice and the Modern Law. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard. 1989. American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alabama State Bar Association. 1887a. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting. In Alabama Bar Association Reports, 1886–91. Montgomery: Brown Printing.Google Scholar
Alabama State Bar Association. 1887b. Code of Ethics. In Alabama Bar Association Reports, 1886–91. Montgomery: Brown Printing.Google Scholar
Alexander, Lucien. 1908. Memorandum for Use of ABA's Committee to Draft Canons of Professional Ethics. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. 1908. Floor Debate. In Report of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association. Baltimore: Lord Baltimore Press.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. 1909. William Wirt Howe. Reports of the American Bar Association 34:622–23.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold. 1971. Enmity and Amity: Law Teachers and Practitioners, 1920–1922. In Law in American History, ed. Fleming, Donald and Bailyn, Bernard. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold. 1974. Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Simeon. 1903. Legal Ethics. Lecture delivered before the Students of the Law Department of Union University. N.p.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Simeon. 1908. The New American Code of Legal Ethics. Columbia Law Review 8:541–47.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Maxwell. 1979. David Hoffman and the Shaping of a Republican Legal Culture. Maryland Law Review 38:673–88.Google Scholar
Brewer, David. 1904a. The Ethical Obligations of the Lawyer as a Lawmaker. American Lawyer 19:299–300.Google Scholar
Brewer, David. 1904b. Legal Ethics: Address Delivered at Commencement of Albany Law School. Albany, N.Y.: Union University.Google Scholar
Brodhead, Michael J. 1994. David J. Brewer: The Life of a Supreme Court Justice, 1837–1910. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, Hamilton W. 1982. Legal Education in Virginia: 1779–1979. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Case and Comment. 19141915. Hon. Thomas Goode Jones. 21:83–84.Google Scholar
Chroust, Anton-Hermann. 1965. The Rise of the Legal Profession in America: The Revolution and Post-Revolutionary Era. Vol. 2. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Code of Professional Ethics. 1906. Report. In Report of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the ABA. Baltimore: Lord Baltimore Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Code of Professional Ethics. 1907. Report. In Report of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association. Baltimore: Lord Baltimore Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Code of Professional Ethics. 1908. Final Report. In Report of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association. Baltimore: Lord Baltimore Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Code of Professional Ethics. 1918. Report of the Committee on Professional Ethics. ABA Journal 4:480–99.Google Scholar
Costigan, George P. Jr. 1917. Cases and Other Authorities on Legal Ethics. St. Paul, Minn.: West.Google Scholar
Current Topics and Notes. 1917. American Law Review 51:752.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Jacob M. 1884. Advisability and Feasibility of Codification. Tennessee Bar Association 3:179.Google Scholar
Drinker, Henry S. 1953. Legal Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Forsyth, William. 1881. Hortensius. Jersey City, N.J.: Frederick D. Linn.Google Scholar
Frank, John P. 1965. The Legal Ethics of Louis D. Brandeis. Stanford Law Review 17:683–709.Google Scholar
Freedman, Monroe. 1991. Ethical Ends and Ethical Means. Journal of Legal Education 41:55–64.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles. 1976. The Lawyer as a Friend. Yale Law Journal 85:1060–89.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis. 1970. The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History. Business History Review 44:279–320.Google Scholar
Gawalt, Gerard W., ed. 1984. The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Georgia Bar Association. 1889. Report of the Committee on Legal Ethics. In Georgia Bar Association Proceedings. Macon: The Association.Google Scholar
Georgia Bar Association. 1896. Report of the Committee on Professional Ethics. In Georgia Bar Association Proceedings. Macon: The Association.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1981. Historicism in Legal Scholarship. Yale Law Journal 90:1017–56.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1983. Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise. In Professionals and Professional Ideologies in America, ed. Geison, G. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1984. The Ideal and the Actual in the Law: Fantasies and Practices of NYC Lawyers: 1870–1910. In Gawalt 1984.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1988. The Independence of Lawyers. Boston University Law Review 68:1–83.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1990. Corporate Law Practice as a Public Calling. Maryland Law Review 49:255–92.Google Scholar
Haber, Samuel. 1991. The Quest for Authority and Honor in the American Professions, 1750–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, William H. 1973. Lawyer's Lawyer: The Life of John W. Davis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvard Law School Association. 1916. Ezra Ripley Thayer: An Estimate of His Work as Dean of the Harvard Law School. Cambridge: Harvard Law School.Google Scholar
Hixson, William B. 1972. Moorfield Storey and the Abolitionist Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, Wayne K. 1984. Symbol of the New Profession: Emergence of the Large Law Firm, 1870–1915. In Gawalt 1984.Google Scholar
Hoffman, David. [1836] 1972. A Course of Legal Study. 2d ed. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to FDR. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. Holmes in American Legal Thought. In The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Homes, Jr., ed. Gordon, Robert W. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Mark DeWolfe. 1932. Portrait of an Independent. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Howe, William Wirt. 1899. Professional Ethics. Virginia Law Review 8:507–20.Google Scholar
Howe, William Wirt. 1907. Corporation Lawyers. Yale Law Journal 16:497–503.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1950. The Growth of American Law: The Law Makers. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1956. Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Illinois Bar Association. 1909. Ethics Report. Springfield: Illinois State Bar Association.Google Scholar
Johnson, John W. 1981. American Legal Culture, 1908–1940. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, William. 1978. Schooled Lawyers: A Study in the Clash of Professional Cultures. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Walter Burgwyn. 1922. First Code of Ethics Adopted in the United States. ABA Journal 8:111–13.Google Scholar
Larson, Magali Sarfatti. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, William Draper. 1900. The Proper Preparation for the Study of Law. American Law Register 11:633–46.Google Scholar
Lewis, William Draper. 1913. The Social Sciences as the Basis of Legal Education. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 61:531–39.Google Scholar
Link, Arthur S., and McCormick, Richard L. 1983. Progressivism. Arlington Heights, Ill.: Harlan Davidson.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 1988. Lawyers and Justice. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Alpheus Thomas. 1936. Brandeis and the Modern State. Washington, D.C.: National Home Library Foundation.Google Scholar
Matzko, John A. 1984. The Best Men of the Bar: The Founding of the American Bar Association. In Gawalt 1984.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1996a. The Trouble with the Adversary System in Post-Modern, Multi-Cultural World. William and Mary Law Review 38:5–44.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1996b. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York University Review of Law and Social Change. 22:265–93.Google Scholar
Mowry, Duane. 1902. Commercialism in the Practice of Law. Albany Law Journal 64:359–60.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., and Trubek, David M. 1992. New Problems and New Paradigms in Studies of the Legal Profession. In Nelson, Trubek, and Solomon 1992.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., Trubek, David M., and Solomon, Rayman L., eds. 1992. Lawyers' Ideals/Lawyers' Practices: Transformations in the American Legal Profession. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, Edwin S. 1911. The Ethics of Advocacy in an Unjust Cause. Law Times 131:40–65.Google Scholar
Parker, Alton B. 1913. The Safe and Right Direction for Progress. Ohio Law Report 11:141–56.Google Scholar
Patterson, Ray L. 1980. Legal Ethics and the Lawyers' Duty of Loyalty. Emory Law Journal 29:909–69.Google Scholar
Paul, Arnold. 1965. Conservative Crises and the Rule of Law. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, Russell G. 1992. Rediscovering the Republican Origins of the Legal Ethics Codes. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 6:241–82.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Bar Association. 1926. Thirty-Second Annual Report. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pepper, Stephen L. 1986. The Lawyer's Amoral Ethical Role: A Defense, A Problem, and Some Possibilities. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1986:613–35.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel. 1982. In Search of Progressivism. Reviews of American History 10:113–32.Google Scholar
Rogers, James Grafton. 1932. American Bar Leaders: Biographies of the Presidents of the ABA 1878–1928. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Rogers, Showell. 1899. The Ethics of Advocacy. Law Quarterly. 59:259–80.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry. 1985. Between the Harvard Founders and the American Legal Realist: The Professionalization of the American Law Professor. Journal of Legal Education 35:311–25.Google Scholar
Schneyer, Theodore. 1984. Moral Philosophy's Standard Misconception of Legal Ethics. Wisconsin Law Review 1529–72.Google Scholar
Schneyer, Theodore. 1989. Professionalism as Bar Politics. Law and Social Inquiry 14:677–737.Google Scholar
Schneyer, Theodore. 1991. Some Sympathy for the Hired Gun. Journal of Legal Education 41:11–27.Google Scholar
Schneyer, Theodore. 1992. Professionalism as Politics: The Making of a Modern Legal Ethics Code. In Nelson, Trubek, and Solomon 1992.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1977. Public, Private, and Professional Lives: The Correspondence of David Dudley Field and Samuel Bowles. American Journal of Legal History 21:191–211.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Murray. 1978. The Professionalism and Accountability of Lawyers. California Law Review 66:669–97.Google Scholar
Sharswood, George. 1860. An Essay on Professional Ethics. 2d ed. Philadelphia: T. & J. W. Johnson.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. 1990. Historism in Late Nineteenth-Century Constitutional Thought. Wisconsin Law Review 1990:1431–1547.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. 1995. Joel Bishop's Orthodoxy. Law & History Review 13:215–59.Google Scholar
Sims, Henry Upson. 1925. The First Problem in Professional Ethics. ABA Journal 11:63–64.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1978. The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics. Wisconsin Law Review 1978:29–144.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1984. Visions of Practice in Legal Thought. Stanford Law Review 36:469–507.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1988. Ethical Discretion in Lawyering. Harvard Law Review 101:1083–1145.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1994. The Dark Secret of Progressive Lawyering: A Comment on Poverty Law Scholarship in the Post-Modern, Post-Reagan Era. University of Miami Law Review 48:1099–1114.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1998. The Practice of Justice: A Theory of Lawyers' Ethics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sims, Henry Upson. 1925. The First Problem in Professional Ethics. ABA Journal 11:63–64.Google Scholar
Spillenger, Clyde. 1996. Elusive Advocate: Reconsidering Brandeis as People's Lawyer. 1996. Yale Law Journal 105:1445–1535.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stetson, Francis Lynde. 1909. The Lawyer's Livelihood. The Green Bag. 21:45–57.Google Scholar
Stevens, Robert. 1983. Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850's to the 1980's. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Storey, Moorfield. 1911. The Reform of Legal Procedure. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strum, Philippa. 1984- Brandeis: Justice for the People. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Strum, Philippa. 1993. Brandeis: Beyond Progressivism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Thayer, Ezra Ripley. 1911. Should the Law Teacher Practice Law Harvard Law Review 25:269–73.Google Scholar
Thayer, Ezra Ripley. 1913. Letter to H. S. Gragin, 11 September 1913. Thayer Correspondence Files, vol. 29. Harvard University Archives.Google Scholar
Tucker, Henry St. George. 1844 - A Few Lectures on Natural Law. Charlottesville, Va.: University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Henry St. George. 1911a. Have the Corporations Been Law Abiding? New Haven: N.p.Google Scholar
Tucker, Henry St. George. 1911b The Lawyer as a Business Man. American Law School Review 3:109–15.Google Scholar
Tucker, Henry St. George. 1916. Women's Suffrage by Constitutional Amendment. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Richard. 1975. Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues. Human Rights 5:1–24.Google Scholar
Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1987. Natural Law and justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White, Edward G. 1978. From Sociological Jurisprudence to Realism. In Patterns of Legal Thought, ed. Edward White, G. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
White, Morton Gabriel. 1949. Social Thought in America: The Revolt Against Formalism. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Wiebe, Robert H. 1967. The Search for Order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1998. Everyday Practice Is the Troubling Case: Confronting Context in Legal Ethics. In Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases, ed. Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 1983. Ethics, Legal Ethics and the Ethics of Law. In The Good Lawyer: Lawyers' Roles and Lawyers' Ethics, ed. Luban, David. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Wolverton, Charles E. 1900. The Ethics of Advocacy. American Law 8:62–67.Google Scholar