Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:01:05.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Legal Construction of Power in Deliberative Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Abstract

Deliberative democracy has grown into an influential normative paradigm for political theory and reform programs alike, but doubts persist about its desirability in a world where strategic action and inequality are prevalent. This problem has spurred efforts to understand the empirical dynamics of power relations in institutionalized participation. This article argues that sociolegal scholarship has yet to join this turn to power but that doing so can help it to specify law’s causal and normative relevance in deliberative governance. This is because the legal environment within which actors interact affects causal mechanisms by distributing opportunities for the exercise of power between potential participants, actual participants, and participants and government. The utility of a power-distributional perspective is illustrated through a study of São Paulo’s health councils, one of the world’s largest experiments in deliberative governance. The study demonstrates that the councils’ trajectory and current functioning—including some of their normatively problematic aspects—cannot be understood without reference to legal arrangements. This article is meant as a building block for sociolegal scholarship to continue investigating deliberation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2020 American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abers, Rebecca. “From Ideas to Practice: The Partido Dos Trabalhadores and Participatory Governance in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives 23, no. 4 (1996): 3553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, E. R.Institutional Transformation and Planning: From Institutionalization Theory to Institutional Design.” Planning Theory 4 (3) (2005): 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, Débora Rezende de. “Metamorfose e Representação Política: Lições Práticas Dos Conselhos Municipais de Saúde Do Brasil.” In A Dinâmica Da Participação Local No Brasil. Edited by Avritzer, Leonardo, 129–74. São Paulo: Cortez, 2010.Google Scholar
Alves Sobrinho, Eduardo Jorge Martins, and Capucci, Paulo Fernando. “Saúde Em São Paulo: Aspectos Da Implantação Do SUS No Período de 2001–2002.” Estudos Avançados 17, no. 48 (2003): 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, Cícero. “Razão Pública, Bem Comum e Decisão Democrática.” In Participação e Deliberação: Teoria Democrática e Experiências Institucionais No Brasil Contemporâneo. Edited by Nobre, Marcos and Coelho, Vera Schattan Pereira, 157–70. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton. “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework.” The American Journal of Political Science Review 57, no. 3 (1963): 632–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, and Silva, Marcelo K.. “The War on Brazilian Democracy.” Boston Review, May, 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Petersen, Rasmus Brun. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren. “The Next Generation of Administrative Law: Building the Legal Infrastructure for Collaborative Governance.” Wisconsin Law Review 2010, no. 2 (2010): 297356.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. “The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. Understanding Institutional Weakness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpini, Michael X. Delli, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. “Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (2004): 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Maria do Carmo, and Teixeira, Ana Claudia C.. Conselhos Gestores de Políticas Públicas. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis, 2000.Google Scholar
Castro, Henrique A. “As Regras Da Participação Democrática: Desenho e Gargalos Jurídico-Institucionais dos Conselhos de Saúde de São Paulo.” Revista de Estudos Empíricos Em Direito (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, Vera Schattan Pereira. “Conselhos de Saúde Enquanto Instituições Políticas: O Que Está Faltando?” In Participação e Deliberação: Teoria Democrática e Experiências Institucionais No Brasil Contemporâneo. Edited by Coelho, Vera Schattan Pereira and Nobre, Marcos, 255–69. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004.Google Scholar
Coelho, Vera Schattan Pereira. “A Democratização Dos Conselhos de Saúde: O Paradoxo de Atrair Não Aliados.” Novos Estudos – CEBRAP 78 (2007): 7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, Vera Schattan Pereira. “What Did We Learn about Citizen Involvement in the Health Policy Process: Lessons from Brazil.” Journal of Public Deliberation 9, no. 1 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, Vera Schattan Pereira, Szabzon, Felipe, and Dias, Marcelo F.. “Política Municipal e Acesso a Serviços de Saúde: São Paulo 2001–12, Quando as Periferias Ganharam Mais Que o Centro.” Novos Estudos 100 (2014): 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, Cary. “Citizen Participation in Rulemaking: Past, Present, and Future.” Duke Law Journal 55 (2006): 943–68.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Rogers, Joel. “Power and Reason.” In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Edited by Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin, 237–58. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
Cohn, Amélia, and Elias, Paulo Eduardo. “O Plano de Atendimento à Saúde Do Município de São Paulo.” Revista de Administração 33, no. 1 (1998): 4450.Google Scholar
Coutinho, Diogo R.O Direito Econômico e a Construção Institucional Do Desenvolvimento Democrático.” Revista de Estudos Institucionais 2, no. 1 (2016): 214–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutinho, Diogo R., Kira, Beatriz, Lessa, Marília Rolemberg, and de Castro, Henrique Almeida. “Participatory Democracy and Law-Making in Contemporary Brazil.” Theory and Practice of Legislation 5, no. 3 (2017): 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutinho, Joana Aparecida. “A Participação Popular Na Gestão Da Saúde de São Paulo.” Lutas Sociais 2 (1997): 125–40.Google Scholar
Cunha, Eleonora Schettini Martins, and de Almeida, Débora Rezende. “Conselhos de Políticas e Desenho Institucional: Potencialidades e Limites Do Isomorfismo Institucional Nas Áreas de Saúde e Da Assistência Social No Brasil.” In Desenho Institucional, Democracia e Participação: Conexões Teóricas e Possibilidades Analíticas. Edited by Cunha, Eleonora Schettini Martins and Theodoro, Hildelano Delanusse, 245–64. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: D’Placido, 2014.Google Scholar
Curato, Nicole, Dryzek, John S., Ercan, Selen A., Hendriks, Carolyn M., and Niemeyer, Simon. “Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research.” Daedalus 146, no. 3 (2017): 2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2, no. 3 (1957): 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, Simon, Gindis, David, Hodgson, Geoffrey M., Huang, Kainan, Pistor, Katharina, and Geoffrey, M.. “Legal Institutionalism: Capitalism and the Constitutive Role of Law.” Journal of Comparative Economics 45, no. 1 (2017): 188200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank R.Cultural Models of Organization: The Social Construction of Rational Organizing Principles.” In The Sociology of Culture: Emerging Theoretical Perspectives. Edited by Crane, Diana, 117–42. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Nelson, Kjersten R.. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 4 (2003): 729–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S.Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberal, Critics, Contestations.” New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., and Stryker, Robin. “A Sociological Approach to Law and the Economy.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Edited by Smelser, Neil J. and Swedberg, Richard, 527–51. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Lynch, Julia F.. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42, no. 9 (2009): 1143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Riofrancos, Thea N.. “Endogenous Participation: Strengthening Prior Consultation in Extractive Economies.World Politics 70, no. 1 (2018): 86121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, Claudia Feres, and Ribeiro, Uriella Coelho. “Entre o Legal e o Real: O Que Dizem as Variáveis Institucionais Sobre Os Conselhos Municipais de Políticas Públicas?” In A Dinâmica Da Participação Local No Brasil. São Paulo: Cortez, 2010.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E.Courts, Constitutions, and Labor Politics in England and America: A Study of the Constitutive Power of Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 16, no. 1 (1991): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Archon. “Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World.” Political Theory 33, no. 3 (2005): 397419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Archon. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66 (2006, Special Issue): 6675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Wright, Erik Olin. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Levy, Jack S.. Causal Explanations, Necessary Conditions, and Case Studies. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W.Critical Legal Histories.” Stanford Law Review 36, no. 1 (1984): 57125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, Avner, and Kingston, Christopher. “Institutions: Rules or Equilibria?” In Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting. Edited by Schofield, Norman and Caballero, Gonzalo, 1343. New York: Springer, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. Why Deliberative Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Patrick, and Rao, Vijayendra. Deliberation and Development: Rethinking the Role of Voice and Collective Action in Unequal Societies. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, Carolyn M.Deliberative Governance in the Context of Power.Policy and Society 28, no. 3 (2009): 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBGE. “Relatório: Perfil Dos Municípios Brasileiros 2012.” Rio de Janeiro, 2013.Google Scholar
IBGE. “Relatório: Perfil Dos Municípios Brasileiros 2013.” Rio de Janeiro, 2014.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Pedro. Movimentos Sociais e Políticas Públicas: Demandas Por Saneamento Básico e Saúde. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 1993.Google Scholar
Kadlec, Alison, and Friedman, Will. “Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power.Journal of Public Deliberation 3, no. 1 (2007): 126.Google Scholar
Kickert, Walter J.M.Beneath Consensual Corporatism: Traditions of Governance in the Netherlands.Public Administration 81, no. 1 (2003): 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, Katherine R., Gastil, John, Reedy, Justin, and Walsh, Katherine Cramer. “Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizen’s Initiative Review.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 41, no. 2 (2013): 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavalle, Adrián Gurza.Após a Participação.” Lua Nova 84 (2011): 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavalle, Adrián Gurza, and Vera, Ernesto Isunza. “A Trama Da Crítica Democrática: Da Participação à Representação e à Accountability.” Lua Nova 84 (2011): 95139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Ron. “The Law of Deliberative Democracy: Seeding the Field.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 12, no. 4 (2013): 355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. Political Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C., O’Flynn, Ian, Fishkin, James S., and Russell, David. “Deliberating across Deep Divides.” Political Studies 62, no. 1 (2014): 116–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maarse, Hans. “The Privatization of Health Care in Europe: An Eight-Country Analysis.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31, no. 5 (2006): 9811014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macaulay, Stewart. “Law and the Behavioral Sciences: Is There Any There There?Law & Policy 6, no. 2 (1984): 149–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Barrenechea, Rodrigo. “The Logic of Counterfactual Analysis in Case-Study Explanation.” British Journal of Sociology 70, no. 1 (2019): 306–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. Explaning Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Føllesdal, Andreas, Fung, Archon, Lafont, Cristina, Manin, Bernard, and Martí, José Luis. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18, no. 1 (2010): 64100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. “The Logic of Appropriateness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Edited by Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin, and Robert, E. Goodin, 689708. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Marques, Eduardo Cesar Leão. “State Institutions, Power, and Social Networks in Brazilian Urban Policies.” Latin American Research Review 47, no. 2 (2012): 2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matta, Gustavo Corrêa, and Contreiras, Henrique. “Privatização Da Gestão Do Sistema Municipal de Saúde Por Meio de Organizações Sociais Na Cidade de São Paulo, Brasil: Caracterização e Análise Da Regulação.” Cad. Saúde Pública 31, no. 2 (2015): 285–97.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence.” In Research in Micropolitics: Political Decisionmaking, Deliberation and Participation. Edited by Michael, X.Carpini, Delli, Huddy, Leonie, and Robert, Y. Schapiro, 151–93. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali, Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Oliphant, J. Baxter. “Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 1 (2014): 1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, Luis Felipe.Representação Democrática: Autonomia e Interesse Ou Identidade e Advocacy.Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política 84 (2011): 353–64.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C.Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?Annual Review of Political Science 11, no. 1 (2008): 521–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabatchi, Tina, Ertinger, Emma, and Leighninger, Matt. “The Future of Public Participation: Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 33, no. 1 (2015): 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neder, Carlos Alberto Pletz. “Participação e Gestão Pública: A Experiência Dos Movimentos Populares de Saúde No Município de São Paulo.” Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2001.Google Scholar
Niemeyer, Simon. “The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics.” Politics and Society 39, no. 1 (2011): 103–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemeyer, Simon, and Dryzek, John S.. “Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (2006): 634–49.Google Scholar
Öberg, Perola. “Does Administrative Corporatism Promote Trust and Deliberation?Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 15, no. 4 (2002): 455–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Owen, David, and Smith, Graham. “Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.Journal of Political Philosophy 23, no. 2 (2015): 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palma, José João Lanceiro da. Lutas Sociais e Construção Do SUS: O Movimento de Saúde Da Zona Leste Da Cidade de São Paulo e a Conquista Da Participação Popular Na Saúde. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Pauloj, 2013.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, John, and Mansbridge, Jane. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, JL Jason L., Neeley, Grant, and Budziak, Jeffrey. “Can Deliberative Democracy Work in Hierarchical Organizations?” Journal of Public Deliberation 4, no. 1 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, Nicanor Rodrigues da Silva, Tanaka, Oswaldo Yoshimi, and Spedo, Sandra Maria. “Política de Saúde e Gestão No Processo de (Re)Construção Do SUS Em Município de Grande Porte: Um Estudo de Caso de São Paulo, Brasil.” Cadernos de Saúde Pública 25, no. 4 (2009): 927–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pires, Roberto R.C.Efetividade Das Instituições Participativas No Brasil: Estratégias de Avaliação. Brasília: IPEA, 2011.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto R.C., and Vaz, Alexandre. “Participação Faz Diferença? Uma Avaliação Das Características e Efeitos Da Institucionalização Da Participação Nos Municípios Brasileiros.” In A Dinâmica Da Participação Local No Brasil. Edited by Avritzer, Leonardo, 222–65. São Paulo: Cortez, 2010.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca, and Chen, Pang Ching Bobby. “Gender and Public Talk: Accounting for Women’s Variable Participation in the Public Sphere.” Sociological Theory 31, no. 4 (2013): 291317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. “Deliberation and Ideological Domination.” In Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Elster, Jon, 140–60. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 1970.Google Scholar
Ryfe, David M.Does Deliberative Democracy Work?Annual Review of Political Science 8 (2005): 4971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sader, Eder. O Movimento de Saúde Da Periferia Leste. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1988.Google Scholar
Sanders, Lynn M.Against Deliberation.Political Theory 25, no. 3 (1997): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. “Enough of Deliberation: Politics Is about Interests and Power.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Macedo, Stephen, 2838. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from around the World. A Report for the POWER Inquiry. London: Power Inquiry, 2005.Google Scholar
Spada, Paolo, and Vreeland, James Raymond. “Who Moderates the Moderators? The Effect of Non-Neutral Moderators in Deliberative Decision Making.” Journal of Public Deliberation 9, no. 2 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedo, Sandra Maria, Pinto, Nicanor Rodrigues da Silva, and Tanaka, Oswaldo Yoshimi. “A Regionalização Intramunicipal Do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS): Um Estudo de Caso Do Município de São Paulo-SP, Brasil.” Saude e Sociedade 19, no. 3 (2010): 533–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedo, Sandra Maria, Tanaka, Oswaldo Yoshimi, and Pinto, Nicanor Rodrigues da Silva. “O Desafio Da Descentralização Do Sistema Único de Saúde Em Município de Grande Porte: O Caso de São Paulo, Brasil.” Cadernos de Saúde Pública 25, no. 8 (2009): 1781–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatagiba, Luciana. “A Institucionalização Da Participação: Os Conselhos Municipais de Políticas Públicas Na Cidade de São Paulo.” In A Participação Em São Paulo. Edited by Avritzer, Leonardo, 323–70. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2004.Google Scholar
Tatagiba, Luciana, and Teixeira, Ana Claudia Chaves. “O Papel Do CMS Na Política de Saúde Em São Paulo.” In Saúde: Controle Social e Política Pública. Edited by Kayano, Jorge, Tatagiba, Luciana, and Teixeira, Ana Claudia Chaves, 59117. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis, 2007.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F.Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.Annual Review of Political Science 11, no. 1 (2008): 497520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tótora, Silvana, and Chaia, Vera. “Conselhos Municipais e a Institucionalização Da Participação Política: A Região Metropolitana de São Paulo.” In Governança Democrática e Poder Local. Edited by Junior, Orlando Alves dos Santos, Ribeiro, Luiz Cesar de Queiroz, and de Azevedo, Sergio, 193221. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2004.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., and Galanter, Marc. “Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States.” Wisconsin Law Review 1974, no. 4 (1974): 10621103.Google Scholar
Vita, Alváro de. “Democracia Deliberativa Ou Igualdade de Oportunidades Políticas?” In Participação e Deliberação: Teoria Democrática e Experiências Institucionais No Brasil Contemporâneo. Edited by Coelho, Vera Schattan Pereira and Nobre, Marcos, 107–30. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward T., Lee, Caroline W., and McQuarrie, Michael. “Rising Participation and Declining Democracy.” In Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. Edited by Lee, Caroline W., McQuarrie, Michael, and Edward, T. Walker, 323. New York: New York University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wampler, Brian, and Hartz-karp, Janette. “Participatory Budgeting: Diffusion and Outcomes across the World.” Journal of Public Deliberation 8, no. 2 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E.Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? Edited by Shawn, W. Rosenberg, 272–88. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. “Increasing Citizen Agency through Deliberation.” Communication for Governance and Accountability Program (CommGAP) Policy Brief. Washington, D.C., 2016.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion.Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion.Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Fishkin, James and Laslett, Peter, 102–20. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerling, Ruth. Influence and Power: Variations on a Messy Theme. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2005.Google Scholar