Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:34:06.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Interest Law Organizations and the Two-Tier System of Access to Justice in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Catherine Albiston ,
Su Li  and
Laura Beth Nielsen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public interest law organizations (PILOs) are important institutions for providing access to justice in the United States. How have political, economic, and institutional factors shaped PILOs? How do PILOs vary in the services they offer and in their geographical location relative to poverty and population in the United States? This article investigates these questions by combining original survey data from a representative sample of public interest law organizations with GIS data on population and poverty. We find that the presence of a PILO is positively related to political progressiveness and population at the county level, but negatively related to the concentration of poverty. Our analysis reveals a two-tier system of public interest representation in which national organizations engage in a variety of social change strategies, whereas local and regional organizations utilize more limited strategies and depend more on governmental funding. These patterns have implications for access to justice in the United States today.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , Fall 2017 , pp. 990 - 1022
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abel, Richard. 2009. State, Market, Philanthropy, and Self‐Help as Legal Services Delivery Mechanisms. In Private Lawyers and the Public Interest: The Evolving Role of Pro Bono in the Legal Profession, ed. Granfield, Robert and Mather, Lynn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine R., Edelman, Lauren B., and Milligan, Joy. 2014. The Dispute Tree and the Legal Forest. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10 (1): 105–31.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine, and Laura, Beth Nielsen. 2007. The Procedural Attack on Civil Rights: The Empirical Reality of Buckhannon for the Private Attorney General. University of California, Los Angeles Law Review 54:1087–134.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine, and Laura, Beth Nielsen. 2014. Funding the Cause: How Public Interest Law Organizations Fund Their Activities and Why It Matters for Social Change. Law & Social Inquiry 39 (1): 62–95.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine, and Rebecca, Sandefur. 2013. Expanding the Empirical Study of Access to Justice. Wisconsin Law Review 101–20.Google Scholar
Alexander, Victoria. 1998. Environmental Constraints and Organizational Strategies: Complexity, Conflict, and Coping in the Nonprofit Sector. In Private Action and the Public Good, ed. Powell, Walter W. and Clemens, Elisabeth S. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (ABA). 2011. Finding Personal Legal Services: Public Opinions About Finding a Lawyer, Using Online Models, Seeking Unbundling Legal Services and Selecting Alternative Service Providers. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association. http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/delivery_legal_services/20110228_aba_harris_survey_report.authcheckdam.pdf (accessed October 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Aron, Nan. 1989. Liberty and Justice for All: Public Interest Law in the 1980's and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jeb, and Burke, Thomas F. 2014. How Policy Shapes Politics: Rights, Courts, Litigation, and the Struggle Over Injury Compensation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven. 2009. The Institutionalization of Pro Bono in Large Law Firms: Trends and Variation Across the AmLaw 200. In Private Lawyers and the Public Interest: The Evolving Role of Pro Bono in the Legal Profession, ed. Mather, Lynn and Granfield, Robert, 135–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven. 2013. Lawyering for Social Change: Pro Bono Publico, Cause Lawyering, and the Social Movement Society. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 18 (2): 179–96.Google Scholar
Buckhorn, Robert. 1972. Nader: The People's Lawyer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Campbell, John. 2005. Where Do We Stand? Common Mechanisms in Organizations and Social Movements Research. In Social Movements and Organization Theory, ed. Davis, Gerald, McAdam, Doug, Scott, W. Richard, and Zald, Mayer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Alan K., and Cummings, Scott L. 2013. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott. 2004. The Politics of Pro Bono. UCLA Law Review 51:1–49.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott. 2008. The Internationalization of Public Interest Law. Duke Law Journal 57 (891): 891–1036.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott. 2012. The Pursuit of Legal Rights—and Beyond. UCLA Law Review 59:506–49.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha F. 1995. Brutal Need: Lawyers and the Welfare Rights Movement, 1960–1973. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. 1981. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. Law & Society Review 15 (3/4): 631–54.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. 1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labour Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Palay, Thomas. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haines, Herbert H. 1984. Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights: 1957–1970. Social Problems 23:31–43.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel, Ginsberg, Betsy, and Snow, Arthur. 1978. The Public Interest Law Industry. In Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis, ed. Allen Weisbrod, Burton, Handler, John, and Komesar, Neil, 42–79. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Gordon, and Sanford, Jaffe. 1973. The Public Interest Law Firm: New Voices for New Constituencies. New York: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L., and Salisbury, Robert H. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Paik, Anthony, and Southworth, Ann. 2003. Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance. Law & Society Review 37:5–50.Google Scholar
Houck, Oliver A. 1984. With Charity for All. Yale Law Journal 93 (8): 1415–1563.Google Scholar
Houseman, Alan. 2001. Civil Legal Assistance for Low‐Income Persons: Looking Back and Looking Forward. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29 (3): 1213–43.Google Scholar
Houseman, Alan. 2002. Legal Aid History. In Poverty Law Manual for the New Lawyer, 18–25. Chicago, IL: National Center on Poverty Law.Google Scholar
Houseman, Alan, and Linda, Perle. 2007. Securing Equal Justice for All: A Brief History of Civil Legal Assistance in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. http://www.clasp.org/resources-and-publications/files/0158.pdf (accessed October 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig. 1983. Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–53.Google Scholar
Johnson, Earl. 1999. Justice and Reform: A Quarter Century Later. In The Transformation of Legal Aid: Comparative and Historical Studies, ed. Regan, Francis, 9–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Earl. 2013. To Establish Justice for All: The Past and Future of Civil Legal Aid in the United States: The Past and Future of Civil Legal Aid in the United States. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC‐CLIO.Google Scholar
Katz, Jack. 1982. Poor Peoples' Lawyers in Transition. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Mark. 1990. Legal Mobilization for Social Reform: Power and the Politics of Agenda Setting. Law & Society Review 24 (1): 121–43.Google Scholar
Kilwein, John. 1998. Still Trying: Cause Lawyering for the Poor and Disadvantaged in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stuart, 181–200. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kluger, Richard. 1976. Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 2003. Taking Out the Adversary: The Assault on Progressive Public‐Interest Lawyers. California Law Review 91:209–46.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn M., Maiman, Richard J., and McEwen, Craig A. 2001. Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1992. Reform Litigation on Trial. Law & Social Inquiry 17 (4): 715–43.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2005. “Persistence and Change Among Nationally Federated Social Movements.” In Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by Davis, Gerald, McAdam, Doug, Scott, W. Richard, and Zald, Mayer, 193–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–41.Google Scholar
Menkel‐Meadow, Carrie. 1998. The Causes of Cause Lawyering: Toward an Understanding of the Motivation and Commitment of Social Justice Lawyers. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stuart A., 31–68. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David, and Boutcher, Steven. 2007. Signals and Spillover: Brown v. Board of Education and Other Social Movements. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 81–93.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, and Scott, W. Richard. 1991. The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter, 108–40. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard, and Sarat, Austin. 1981. Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture. Law & Society Review 15 (3/4): 525–66.Google Scholar
Nader, Ralph. 1965. Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed‐In Dangers of the American Automobile. New York: Knightsbridge.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. 1988. Partners with Power: The Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., and Laura, Beth Nielsen. 2000. Cops, Counsel, and Entrepreneurs: Constructing the Role of Inside Counsel in Large Corporations. Law & Society Review 34 (2): 457–93.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth, and Albiston, Catherine. 2006. The Organization of Public Interest Practice: 1975–2004. North Carolina Law Review 84:1591–1621.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen, and Epstein, Lee. 1983. The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation. Journal of Politics 45 (2): 479–89.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan M. 1984. Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Paik, Anthony, Southworth, Ann, and Heinz, John P. 2007. Lawyers of the Right: Networks and Organization. Law & Social Inquiry 32 (4): 883–917.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and Dimaggio, Paul J. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quigley, William. 1998. The Demise of Law Reform and the Triumph of Legal Aid: Congress and the Legal Services Corporation from the 1960s Through the 1990s. Saint Louis University Public Law Review 17:241–64.Google Scholar
Regan, Francis. 1999. The Transformation of Legal Aid: Comparative and Historical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah. 2008. Public Interest Law: The Movement at Midlife. Stanford Law Review 60:2027–84.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah. 2011. Access to Justice: An Agenda for Legal Education and Research. Consortium on Access to Justice, Center on the Legal Profession, Stanford Law School. Stanford Law School. https://law.stanford.edu/publications/access-to-justice-an-agenda-for-legal-education-and-research/(accessed October 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salyer, Lucy. 1995. Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca. 2007a. Lawyers' Pro Bono Service and American‐Style Civil Legal Assistance. Law & Society Review 41 (1): 79–112.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca. 2007b. The Importance of Doing Nothing: Everyday Problems and Responses of Inaction. In Transforming Lives: Law and Social Process, ed. Pleasence, Pascoe and Buck, Alexy. Norwich, UK: Stationery Office Books.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca. 2008. Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality. Annual Review of Sociology 34 (1): 339–58.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca. 2012 . Money Isn't Everything: Understanding Moderate Income Households' Use of Lawyers' Services. In Middle Income Access to Justice, ed. Trebilcock, Michael, Duggan, Anthony, and Sossin, Lorne, 222–45. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca, and Selbin, Jeffrey. 2009. The Clinic Effect. Clinical Law Review 16:57–107.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca, and Smyth, Aaron. 2011. Access Across America: First Report of the Civil Justice Infrastructure Mapping Project. Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William L. F. 1989. Lawyers and Legal Consciousness: Law Talk in the Divorce Lawyer's Office. Yale Law Journal 98 (8): 1663–88.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A. 1998. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2006. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Richard. 2014. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests & Identities. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Seron, Carol. 1996. The Business of Practicing Law: The Work Lives of Solo and Small‐Firm Attorneys. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Siegelman, Peter, and Donohue, John J. 1990. Studying the Iceberg from its Tip: A Comparison of Published and Unpublished Employment Discrimination Cases. Law & Society Review 24 (5): 1133–70.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2004. Conservative Lawyers and the Contest Over the Meaning of Public Interest Law. UCLA Law Review 52: 1223–78.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2009. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1988. The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro‐Choice Movement. American Sociological Review 53 (4): 585–606.Google Scholar
Stone, Roger. 1991. The Mass Plaintiff: Public Interest Law, Direct Mail Fundraising and the Donor/Client. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 25:197–241.Google Scholar
Stryker, Robin. 1994. Rules, Resources, and Legitimacy Processes: Some Implications for Social Conflict, Order and Change. American Journal of Sociology 99 (4): 847–910.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark, and Cahill, Mia. 1996. The Hired Gun as Facilitator: Lawyers and the Suppression of Business Disputes in Silicon Valley. Law & Social Inquiry 21 (3): 91–142.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R., Dobbin, Frank, Meyer, John W., and Scott, Richard. 1994. The Legalization of the Workplace. American Journal of Sociology 99:944–71.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law, 2d ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1987. The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1994. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1983. The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America. American Political Science Review 77 (2): 390–406.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, Burton Allen, Handler, Joel F., and Komesar, Neil K. 1978. Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System. American Political Science Review 77 (3): 690–703.Google Scholar
Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972).Google Scholar
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970).Google Scholar
In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978).Google Scholar
Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez, 531 U.S. 533 (2001).Google Scholar
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963).Google Scholar
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).Google Scholar
Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972).Google Scholar
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970).Google Scholar
In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978).Google Scholar
Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez, 531 U.S. 533 (2001).Google Scholar
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963).Google Scholar
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).Google Scholar