Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:46:05.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Punishing Bodies, Securing the Nation: How Rule of Law Can Legitimate the Urbane Authoritarian State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Jothie Rajah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although authoritarian rule of law may seem an oxymoron, strategic reconfigurations of the “rule of law” can produce acceptance of law that observes procedure while erasing rights. By bringing into conjunction critical discourse theory and scholarship on the legal professions and political liberalism, this article shows how rulers can deploy rhetoric and legislation to produce derogations from the liberal content of rule of law while sustaining a state legitimacy built on claims to state realizations of rule of law. A close analysis of Singapore's Vandalism Act shows that silencing the critique of lawyers and constraining the power of judges has been crucial to a legitimation of the surveillance and criminalization of dissenters. The consolidation of state power effected via law and discourse might be seen as making the nation a notional panopticon—corporal punishment, even if conducted behind prison walls, becomes instructive public spectacle conveying the state's seeming omniscience and monopolistic command of law.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , Fall 2011 , pp. 945 - 970
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abel, Richard L. 2007. Contesting Legality in the United States after September 11. In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex for Political Change, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., 361–402. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Barker, E. W. 1966. Parliamentary Debates, Sing., vol. 25, col. 298, August 26.Google Scholar
Barzilai, Gad. 2007. “The Ambivalent Language of Lawyers in Israel”: Liberal Politics, Economic Liberalism, Silence and Dissent. In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex for Political Change, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., 247–78. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 1997. A Communitarian Critique of Authoritarianism: The Case of Singapore. Political Theory 25 (1): 6–32.Google Scholar
Biddulph, Sarah. 2007. Legal Reform and Administrative Detention Powers in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Mark. 2003. Ethnology and Colonial Administration in Nineteenth‐Century British India: the Question of Native Crime and Criminality. British Journal for the History of Science, 36 (2): 201–19.Google Scholar
Business Times. 1994. SM urges SBC Drama Head to Stay Despite Son's Vandal Conviction. Business Times [of Singapore], August, 1.Google Scholar
Chan, Sek Keong. 2009. Keynote Address to New York State Bar Association Seasonal Meeting in Singapore, October 27. http://www.supcourt.gov.sg (accessed May, 03, 2010).Google Scholar
Chua, Beng‐Huat. 1995. Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1985. Violence and the Word. Yale Law Journal 95: 1601–29.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 2010. Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fisch, Jorg. 1983. Cheap Lives and Dear Limbs: The British Transformations of the Bengal Criminal Law, 1769–1817. Wiesbaden, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1969 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, 2nd ed. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991 2002. Governmentality. In Michel Foucault: Power, Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, ed. Faubion, James D. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
George, Cherian. 2006. Contentious Journalism and the Internet: Towards Democratic Discourse in Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
George, Cherian. 2007. Consolidating Authoritarian Rule: Calibrated Coercion in Singapore. Pacific Review 20 (2): 127–45.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John, and Nicholson, Pip. 2005. The Diversity and Dynamism of Legal Change in Socialist China and Vietnam. In Asian Socialism and Legal Change, ed. Gillespie, John and Nicholson, Pip. Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir. 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goh, Chok Tong, Prime Minister. 1994. National Day Rally Address by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, Speech in English, August. Speech‐Text Archival and Retrieval System: http://stars.nhb.gov.sg/stars/public (accessed May 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin. 1994 2002. Introduction. In Michel Foucault: Power, Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, ed. Faubion, James D. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Karpik, Lucien. 1997. Politics Matter: A New Framework for the Comparative and Historical Study of Legal Professions. In Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism, ed. Halliday, Terence C. and Karpik, Lucien, 15–64. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Karpik, Lucien. Forthcoming. Colonialism's Legacies: Variations on the Theme of Political Liberalism in the British Post‐Colony. In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post‐Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex in Africa, South Asia and South East Asia, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm. 2007. Introduction: The Legal Complex in Struggles for Political Liberalism. In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex for Political Change, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., 1–40. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew, and Carter, Connie. 2003. The Singapore Model of Law and Development: Cutting through the Complexity. In Law and Development: Facing Complexity in the 21st Century, ed. Hatchard, John and Perry‐Kessaris, Amanda, 191–206. Routledge‐Cavendish.Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew, and Whiting, Amanda. Forthcoming. “Custodian of Civil Liberties and Justice in Malaysia”: The Malaysian Bar and the Moderate State. In Fortunes and Misfortunes of Political Liberalism: The Legal Complex in the Post‐Colony, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, Tim. 2001. Lim Chin Siong and the Singapore Story. In Comet in Our Sky: Lim Chin Siong in History, ed. Quee, Tan Jing and Jomo, K.S., 3–56. Kuala Lumpur: Insan.Google Scholar
Ho, Khai Leong. 2003. Shared Responsibilities, Unshared Power: The Politics of Policy‐Making in Singapore. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.Google Scholar
Hong, Lysa, and Huang, Jianli. 2008. The Scripting of a National History: Singapore and Its Pasts. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Hor, Michael. 2005. “Law and Terror”: Singapore Stories and Malaysian Dilemmas. In Global Anti‐Terrorism Law and Policy, ed. Hor, Michael, Ramraj, Victor, and Roach, Kent, 273–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 1999. Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia: The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2001. The Exception Becomes the Norm: Law and Regimes of Exception in East Asia. Asian Pacific Law & Policy Journal 2 (1): 108–24.Google Scholar
Jones, Carol A. G. 2007. “Dissolving the People”: Capitalism, Law and Democracy in Hong Kong. In Halliday, Terence, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm eds., Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, 109–50. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Karpik, Lucien. 1999. French Lawyers: A Study in Collective Action, 1274 to 1994. Trans. Nora Scott. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kleinfeld, Rachel. 2006. Competing Definitions of the Rule of Law. In Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad, ed. Carothers, Thomas. 31–69. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. 1966. Parliamentary Debates, Sing., vol. 25, col. 296–297, August 26.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. 1967. Speech delivered at Annual Dinner of Singapore Advocates and Solicitors Society, March 18; Singapore, Malayan Law Journal 1 xxxvi.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. 2000. From Third World to First: The Singapore Story, 1965–2000. Singapore: Times Editions.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. 2007. Why Singapore Is What It Is. Straits Times, October 15.Google Scholar
Leong, Weng Kam. 1994. Biggest crisis has brought family even closer. Straits Times, August 7.Google Scholar
Lim, Mark Fung Chian. 1994. An Appeal to Use the Rod Sparingly. Singapore Law Review 15: 20–96.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. 2000. Sword and Scales: An Examination of the Relationship between Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. Forthcoming. The Disintegration of the Legal Complex in Sudan. In Political Liberalism and the Legal Complex in the Post‐Colony, ed. Halliday, Terence, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. Mobilising the Law in an Authoritarian State: The Legal Complex in Contemporary Egypt. In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex for Political Change, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., 193–218. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1996. Can There Be a Sociology of Legal Meaning? In Law as Communication, ed. Nelken, David, 107–28. Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Penelope. 2007. Borrowing Court Systems. Leiden, Germany: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2004. Varieties of Rule of Law: An Introduction and Provisional Conclusion. In Asian Discourses of Rule of Law, ed. Peerenboom, Randall, 1–55. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rajah, Jothie. 2009. Legislating Illiberalism: Law, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore. PhD diss., School of Law, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Rajah, Jothie. Forthcoming. Lawyers, Politics, and Publics: State Management of Lawyers and Legitimacy in Singapore. In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post‐Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex in Africa, South Asia and South East Asia, ed. Halliday, Terence, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramesh, S. 2010. Why S'pore must “Robustly” Defend its Courts, Police Force. Today, August 4. http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1073061/1/.html, accessed on October 21, 2010.Google Scholar
Rodan, Garry. 2004. Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Rodan, Garry. 2005. Westminster in Singapore: Now You See It, Now You Don't. In Westminster Legacies: Democracy and Responsible Government in Asia and the Pacific, ed., Patapan, Haig, Wanna, John, and Weller, Patrick, 109–28. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Rutter, Michael. 1989. The Applicable Law in Singapore and Malaysia : A Guide to Reception, Precedent and the Sources of Law in the Republic of Singapore and the Federation of Malaysia. Singapore: Malayan Law Journal.Google Scholar
Sai, Siew Min, and Huang, Jianli. 1999. The “Chinese‐educated” Political Vanguards: Ong Pang Boon, Lee Khoon Choy & Jek Yeun Thong. In Lee's Lieutenants: Singapore's Old Guard, ed., Er, Lam Peng and Tan, Kevin Y. L., 132–68. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1997. Human Rights and Asian Values. New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and international Affairs.Google Scholar
Seow, Francis. 1998. The Media Enthralled: Singapore Revisited. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Seow, Francis. 2006. Beyond Suspicion? The Singapore Judiciary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 2008. Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. In Rule By Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 326–36. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheehey, Benedict. 2004. Singapore, “Shared Values” and Law: Non East versus West Constitutional Hermeneutic. Hong Kong Law Journal 34: 67–82.Google Scholar
Sidel, Mark. 2008. Law and Society in Vietnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. 2008. Singapore: The Exception That Proves Rules Matter. In Rule By Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 73–101. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966a. 100 US Troops in S'pore for Rest. Straits Times, April 6, 5.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966b. Society Illegal, Dr Lee Warned. Straits Times, April 10, 2.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966c. “Aid Vietnam” Display by Barisan. Straits Times, April 11, 4.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966d. Anti‐US Slogans Daubed on Bus Shelters. Straits Times, April 14, 9.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966e. Two Barisan Leaders Arrested on Sedition Charge. Straits Times, April 16, 1.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966f. Anti‐US Name Campaign. Straits Times, May 19, 11.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966g. Barisan Hits “Phoney Freedom.” Straits Times, August 10, 5.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1966h. Reasons Behind the Vandalism Bill. Straits Times, August 25, 4.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1967. Father Denounces Son as “Incorrigible.” Straits Times, August 15, 6.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1994a. Teen Vandal Gets Jail and Cane. Straits Times, March 4, 1.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1994b. Vandal case: HK Boy Gave Names of Others. Straits Times, March 16, 2.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1994c. Police Officers Hit Me, Says Hongkong Student. Straits Times, March 17, 25.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1994d. US Reaction to Fay Case Shows It Dare not Punish Criminals. Straits Times, April 13, 3.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1994e. Caning Sentence on Fay to Stay. Straits Times, May 5.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 1994f. Hongkonger Convicted of Vandalism to Get 6 Strokes. Straits Times, June 19, 1.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, C. C. 1967. Welcome Speech delivered at Annual Dinner of the Singapore Advocates and Solicitors Society, March 18, 1967; Singapore, Malayan Law Journal 1 xxxv.Google Scholar
Tan, Eugene K. B. 2002. “WE” v. “I”: Communitarian Legalism in Singapore. Australian Journal of Asian Law 4: 1–29.Google Scholar
Tang, See Chim. 1966. Parliamentary Debates, Sing., vol. 25, col. 293, August 26.Google Scholar
Thio, Li‐ann. 2004. Rule of Law within a Non‐Liberal “Communitarian” Democracy: The Singapore Experience. In Asian Discourses of Rule of Law, ed. Peerenboom, Randall, 183–224. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tremewan, Christopher. 1994. The Political Economy of Social Control, Hampshire, UK: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Udagam, Deepika. Forthcoming. The Sri Lankan Legal Complex and the Liberal Project: Only Thus Far and No More. In Fortunes and Misfortunes of Political Liberalism: The Legal Complex in the Post‐Colony, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wee, Toon Boon. 1966. Parliamentary Debates, Sing., vol. 25, col. 291–305, August 26.Google Scholar
Worthington, Ross. 2003. Governance in Singapore. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Yang, Anand A. 2003. Indian Convict Workers in Southeast Asia in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries. Journal of World History 14 (2): 179–208.Google Scholar
Yao, Souchou. 2007. Singapore: The State and the Culture of Excess. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Ang Chin Sang v. Public Prosecutor, [1970] 2 M.L.J. 6 (Sing.H.C.).Google Scholar
Fay v. Public Prosecutor, [1994] 2 Sing. L.R. 154 (H.C.).Google Scholar
Michael Peter Fay v. Public Prosecutor, [3 March 1994], M/A No. 48/94/01 (Sing. Subordinate Cts).Google Scholar
Public Prosecutor v. Liu Tong Ban (1966) unreported.Google Scholar
Shiu Chi Ho v. Public Prosecutor (25 April 1994), M/A 93/94/01 (Sing. Subordinate Cts.).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Children and Young Persons Act (Cap. 38, 2001 Rev. Ed. Sing.).Google Scholar
Children and Young Persons Ordinance (Cap. 128, 1955 Rev. Ed. Sing.).Google Scholar
Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (1999 Rev. Ed.).Google Scholar
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 231, 1955 Rev. Ed. Sing.).Google Scholar
Minor Offences Ordinance (Cap. 117, 1936 Rev. Ed. Sing.).Google Scholar
Vandalism Act (Cap.341, 1985 Rev. Ed. Sing.).Google Scholar