Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:17:43.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Right Paper”: Developing Legal Literacy in a Legal Self-Help Clinic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Alyse Bertenthal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Legal self-help is the fastest-growing segment of legal services in the United States, and a significant addition to the repertoire of programs aimed at opening up access to justice in the civil legal system. Few studies, however, have examined how such services work in practice. Through ethnographic research and analysis of meetings between unrepresented litigants and attorneys offering advice in a legal self-help clinic, this article expands the empirical investigation of access to justice to consider what legal self-help looks like in actual practice. In this article, I follow the concept of the “right paper” to analyze the process through which legal self-help litigants develop legal literacy, including the role of lawyers in helping them to do so. The article concludes by discussing what such practices reveal about recent efforts to open up access to justice and also about the dynamics through which people come to think about law and, especially, how to use it.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , Fall 2017 , pp. 963 - 989
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, Jane H., and Wizner, Stephen. 2013. Measuring Justice. Wisconsin Law Review 2013 (1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine R., and Sandefur, Rebecca L. 2013. Expanding the Empirical Study of Access to Justice. Wisconsin Law Review 2013 (1): 101–20.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (ABA). 2014. The Self‐Help Center Census: A National Survey. Report prepared by the ABA Standing Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services. http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/delivery_legal_services/ls_del_self_help_center_census.authcheckdam.pdf (accessed October 31, 2016).Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, David, and Hamilton, Mary. 2000. Literacy Practices. In Situated Literacies, Reading and Writing in Context, ed. Barton, David, Hamilton, Mary, and Ivanič, Ron, 7–15. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berrey, Ellen, Hoffman, Steve G., and Beth Nielsen, Laura. 2012. Situated Justice: A Contextual Analysis of Fairness and Inequality in Employment Discrimination Litigation. Law & Society Review 46 (1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Bertenthal, Alyse. Forthcoming. Speaking of Justice: Encounters in a Legal Self‐Help Clinic. Political and Legal Anthropology Review.Google Scholar
Blackard, W. Raymond. 1939. The Demoralization of the Legal Profession in Nineteenth Century America. Tennessee Law Review 16:314–23.Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna. 1997. Gendered Lawyering: Difference and Dominance in Lawyer‐Client Interaction. Law & Society Review 31 (4): 677–712.Google Scholar
Brenneis, Don. 2006. Reforming Promise. In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Riles, Annelise, 41–70. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Briet, Suzanne. 2006. What Is Documentation?: English Translation of the Classic French Text, trans. Day, Ronald E., Martinet, Laurent, with Anghelescu, Hermina G. B. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 2002. Writing and (Re)Writing Devices as Tools for Managing Complexity. In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, ed. Law, John and Mol, Annemarie, 191–218. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Charn, Jeanne, and Selbin, Jeffrey. 2013. The Clinic Lab Office. Wisconsin Law Review 2013 (1): 145–69.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy, and David, Chalmers 1998. The Extended Mind. Analysis 58 (1): 7–19.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne. 2014. Our Word Is Our Bond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan Bibler. 2011. Falling Outside: Excavating the History of Central American Asylum Seekers. Law & Social Inquiry 36:569–96.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan Bibler, and Fortin, Véronique. 2015. Legal Ethnographies and Ethnographic Law. In The Handbook of Law and Society, ed. Sarat, Austin and Ewick, Patricia, 71–84. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Rendall, Steven F. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Flaherty, Michael B. 2002. How Courts Help You Help Yourself. Family Court Review 40 (1): 91–115.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Béatrice. 2006. Actes Écrits, Actes Oraux: La Performativité à l’Épreuve De l’Écriture. Études de Communication 69–93.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Béatrice. 2011. Street Shrines and the Writing of Disaster. In Grassroots Memorials: The Politics of Memorializing Traumatic Death, ed. Jan Margry, Peter and Sánchez‐Carretero, Cristina, 229–43. New York: Berghan Books.Google Scholar
Gee, James. 1991. Socio‐Cultural Approaches to Literacy (Literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12:31–48.Google Scholar
Giddings, Jeff, and Robertson, Michael. 2003. Large‐Scale Map or the A–Z? The Place of Self‐Help Services in Legal Aid. Journal of Law and Society 30 (1): 102–19.Google Scholar
Giddings, Jeff, and Robertson, Michael. 2014. Self‐Advocates in Civil Legal Disputes: How Personal and Other Factors Influence the Handling of their Cases. Melbourne University Law Review 38:119–50.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1994. Professional Vision. American Anthropologist 96:606–33.Google Scholar
Greacen, John M. 2002. Self Represented Litigants and Court and Legal Services Responses to Their Needs What We Know. http://www.courts.ca.gov/partners/documents/SRLwhatweknow.pdf (accessed October 31, 2016).Google Scholar
Greiner, D. James, Jiménez, Dalié, and Lupica, Lois R. Forthcoming. Lay Deployment of Professional Legal Knowledge. Indiana Law Journal.Google Scholar
Hull, Matthew. 2003. The File: Agency, Authority, and Autography in an Islamabad Bureaucracy. Language & Communication 23 (3): 287–314.Google Scholar
Hull, Matthew. 2012. Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Nathan. 1915. The Merchant and His Law. Journal of Political Economy 529–61.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2008. Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms. Review of Research in Education 32 (1): 241–67.Google Scholar
Knorr‐Cetina, Karin, and Amann, Klaus. 1990. Image Dissection in Natural Scientific Inquiry. Science, Technology & Human Values 15:259–83.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2009. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’ État, trans. Brilman, Marina and Pottage, Alain. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Fabiana. 2009. Documenting Accountability: Environmental Impact Assessment in a Peruvian Mining Project. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 32:218–36.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1985. Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility. Social Studies of Science 15:37–66.Google Scholar
Manzo, John F. 1996. Taking Turns and Taking Sides: Opening Scenes from Two Jury Deliberations. Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (2): 107–25.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1993. Reproducing Rape: Domination Through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. 1990. Narratives and Narrative Structure in Plea Bargaining. In Language in the Judicial Process, ed. Levi, Judith N. and Graffam Walker, Ann, 65–95. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mellinkoff, David. 1963. The Language of the Law. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1994. Legal Language: Pragmatics, Poetics, and Social Power. Annual Reviw of Anthropology 23:435–55.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 2007. The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like a Lawyer.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pleasence, Pascoe, Balmer, Nigel, and Buck, Alexy. 2006. Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pontille, David. 2006. Produire Des Actes Juridiques. Sociologie du Travail et Activité 113–26.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1908. Mechanical Jurisprudence. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1914. The Lay Tradition as to the Lawyer. Michigan Law Review 627–38.Google Scholar
Probert, Walter. 1972. Language. Law and Communication. Springfield: Charles C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Rasch, Meehan. 2011. A New Public Interest Appellate Model: Public Counsel's Court‐Based Self‐Help Clinic and Pro Bono “Triage” for Indigent Pro Se Civil Litigants on Appeal. Journal of Appellate Practice & Process 11:461–509.Google Scholar
Reasoner, Harry M., McAllister, Patricia E., and Sales, James B. 2012. A Report to the Supreme Court Advisory Committee from the Texas Acccess to Justice Commission on the Court's Uniform Forms Task Force. http://www.texasatj.org/sites/default/files/041012TAJCReport toSCACREVISED.pdf (accessed October 31, 2016).Google Scholar
Reed, Adam. 2006. Documents Unfolding. In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Riles, Annelise, 158–78. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Reese, Roy W., and Eldred, Carolyn A. 1994. Findings of the Comprehensive Legal Needs Study. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 1998. Infinity Within the Brackets. American Ethnologist 25:378–98.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2001. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rock, Frances, Heffer, Chris, and Conley, John. 2013. Textual Travel in Legal‐Lay Communication. In Legal‐Lay Communication: Textual Travels in the Law, ed. Heffer, Chris, Rock, Frances, and Conley, John, 3–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca L. 2016. What We Know and Need to Know About the Legal Needs of the Public. South Carolina Law Review 67:443–60.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William L. F. 1995. Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffer, Thomas. 2006. The Microformation of Criminal Defense: On the Lawyer's Notes, Speech Production, and a Field of Presence. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39:303–42.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1994. Manners of Imagining the Real. Law & Social Inquiry 19:995–1022.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Jessica. 2015. Demand Side Reform in the Poor People's Court. Connecticut Law Review 47 (3): 741–807.Google Scholar
Street, Brian V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Brian V. 2012. New Literacy Studies. In Language, Ethnography, and Education: Bridging New Literacy Studies and Bordieu, ed. Grenfell, Michael et al., 27–49. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trinch, Shonna. 2010. Disappearing Discourse: Performative Texts and Identity in Legal Contexts. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 7:207–29.Google Scholar
Vismann, Cornelia. 2008. Files: Law and Media Technology, trans. Winthrop‐Young, G. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, John Gaylord. 1879. Every Man His Own Lawyer. New York: JG Wells. https://archive.org/details/wellseverymanhis00wellrich (accessed October 31, 2016).Google Scholar
Wydick, Richard C. 1978. Plain English for Lawyers. California Law Review 727–65.Google Scholar
Young, Kathryne. 2014. Everyone Knows the Game: Legal Consciousness in the Hawaiian Cockfight. Law & Society Review 48 (3): 499–530.Google Scholar