Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-xjl2h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-18T06:57:40.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subduing Asylum-Seekers’ Voices: Narrative Genres and the Impossibility of Credibility Tests During Refugee Status Determination Hearings

Review products

Vogl, Anthea. Judging Refugees: Narrative and Oral Testimony in Refugee Status Determination, Cambridge and New York: CUP, 2024.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2025

Dagmar Rita Myslinska
Dagmar Rita Myslinska*
Affiliation:
College of Law, Stetson University, Gulfport, FL, USA
*
Email: dmyslinska@law.stetson.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
International Book Essays
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , May 2025 , pp. 635 - 642
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Administrative Appeals Tribunal. “Migration and Refugee Division, Guidelines on the Assessment of Credibility.” (Australia), 2015.Google Scholar
Barsky, Robert. Constructing a Productive Other: Discourse Theory and the Convention Refugee Hearing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1994.10.1075/pbns.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmer, Carol, and Shuman, Amy. Political Asylum Deceptions: The Culture of Suspicion. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-67404-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd White, James. “Law as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Law: The Arts of Cultural and Communal Life,” University of Chicago Law Review 52, no. 3 (1985): 684–702. 10.2307/1599632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Peter, and Gewirtz, Paul. Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Chimni, B.S. “The Geopolitics of Refugee Studies: A View from the South,” Journal of Refugee Studies 11, no. 4 (1998): 350–374. 10.1093/jrs/11.4.350-aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, John M., and O’Barr, William. Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
de Bruïne, Gabi, et al. “Culture and credibility: The assessment of asylum seekers’ statements,” Psychology, Crime & Law (2023): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Evans, Hilary. “Refugee Status Determinations and the Limits of Memory,” International Journal of Refugee Law 22, no. 4 (2010): 469–511. 10.1093/ijrl/eeq041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, Sujatha. Created Stories: The Uses and Misuses of Storytelling. New York: OUP, 2017.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190618049.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia. Crimmigration Law (2nd ed). Chicago: American Bar Association, 2022.Google Scholar
Gatta, Gian Luigi, et al. (eds) Controlling Immigration Through Criminal Law: European and Comparative Perspectives on “Crimmigration.” Oxford: Hart, 2020.10.5040/9781509933952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Nick, and Good, Anthony. Asylum Determination in Europe: Ethnographic Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.10.1007/978-3-319-94749-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Herlihy, Jane, and Turner, Stuart W.. “The Psychology of Seeking Protection,” International Journal of Refugee Law 21, no. 2 (2009): 171–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immigration and Refugee Board. “Assessment of Credibility in Claims for Refugee Protection.” Canada, 2004.Google Scholar
Kneebone, Susan. “The Refugee Review Tribunal and the Assessment of Credibility: An Inquisitorial Role?,” Australian Journal of Administrative Law 5 (1998): 78–96. Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick. Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2014.10.56021/9781421414003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maryns, Katrijn, and Blommaert, Jan. “Stylistic and Thematic Shifting as a Narrative Resource: Assessing Asylum Seekers’ Repertoires,” Multilingua 20, no. 1 (2001): 61–84. 10.1515/MULTI.2001.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari. “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story,” Michigan Law Review 87 (1989): 2320–81.10.2307/1289306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millbank, Jenni. “The Ring of Truth: A Case Study of Credibility Assessment in Particular Social Group Refugee Determinations,” International Journal of Refugee Law 21, no. 1 (2009): 1–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noll, Gregor (ed.) Proof, Evidentiary Assessment and Credibility in Asylum Procedures. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijoff, 2005.10.1163/9789047406198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, Maria, and Stevens, Dallal (eds.) States, the Law and Access to Refugee Protection: Fortresses and Fairness. Oxford: Hart, 2017.Google Scholar
Q’un Q’un Xiien, Archibald Jo-ann, et al. Decolonizing Research: Indigenous Storywork as Methodology. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.Google Scholar
Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, et al. (eds.) Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform. New York: NYU Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Razack, Sherene H. “Simple Logic: Race, the Identity Documents Rule and the Story of a Nation Besieged and Betrayed,” Journal of Law and Social Policy 15 (2000): 181–209. 10.60082/0829-3929.1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Cécile, et al. “The Complexity of Determining Refugeehood: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Decision-making Process of the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board,” Journal of Refugee Studies 15, no. 1 (2005): 43–70. 10.1093/jrs/15.1.43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Joseph R. Human Rights, Inc.: The World Novel, Narrative Form, and International Law. New York: Fordham University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souter, James. “A Culture of Disbelief or Denial? Critiquing Refugee Status Determination in the United Kingdom,” Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration 1, no. 1 (2011): 48–59. Google Scholar
Spijkerboer, Thomas (ed.) Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual Orientation, Gender and Asylum. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.10.4324/9780203515723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuitt, Patricia. False Images: Law’s Construction of the Refugee. London and East Haven: Pluto Press, 1996.Google Scholar
UNHCR. “Beyond Proof: Credibility Assessment in EU Asylum Systems,” 2013.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice. “Asylum Credibility and Corroborating Evidence in the Federal Courts of Appeals and in the Board of Immigration Appeals Outlines,” 2011.Google Scholar
Zagor, Matthew. “Recognition and Narrative Identities: Is Refugee Law Redeemable?” In Allegiance and Identity in a Globalised World (CUP), Fiona Jenkins et al. (eds), 2014.10.1017/CBO9781139696654.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar