Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:23:05.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transnational Anticorruption Law in Action: Cases from Argentina and Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kevin E. Davis ,
Guillermo Jorge  and
Maíra R. Machado
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Debates over whether transnational and international legal institutions are fair, effective, or legitimate responses to corruption of local public officials have an important empirical dimension. We use case studies to examine whether foreign legal institutions serve as fair, effective, and legitimate complements to local anticorruption institutions. We refer to this set of claims as the “institutional complementarity theory.” The first case study centers on proceedings concerning bribes paid by subsidiaries of Siemens AG, a German company, to obtain and retain a contract to provide national identity cards for the Argentine government. The second case study examines events stemming from overbilling in the construction of a courthouse in Brazil. Analysis of these cases suggests that the institutional complementary theory is credible. At the same time, the findings suggest that local institutions have greater potential, and foreign institutions have more limited potential, than the theory assumes.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , Summer 2015 , pp. 664 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

AGU. 2012. Advocacia‐Geral fecha acordo com Grupo OK para ressarcir quase R$ 500 milhões desviados dos cofres públicos. August 23. http://www.agu.gov.br/page/content/detail/id_conteudo/205939; http://en.mercopress.com/2012/08/24/brazilian‐former‐senator‐agrees‐to‐reimburse‐234‐million‐dollars‐of‐looted‐money (accessed October 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Alconada Mon, Hugo. 2011. Las Coimas del gigante Alemán. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar
Abramo, Claudio, Capobianco, Eduardo, and Naves, Rubens. 2002. Contratação de obras e serviços licitações. In Caminhos da Transparência. Análise dos componentes de um sistema nacional de integridade, ed. Speck, Bruno. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José. 1999. Crimes of State/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. Yale Journal of International Law 24:365–483.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogerio. 2011. The Federal Police and the Ministerio Publico. In Corruption and Democracy in Brazil. The Struggle for Accountability, ed. Power, Timothy and Taylor, Matthew, 184–216. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Balan, Manuel. 2011. Competition by Denunciation: The Political Dynamics of Corruption Scandals in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Politics 43:459–478.Google Scholar
Blake, William. 1863. Auguries of Innocence. In Alexander Gilchrist, Life of William Blake: Pictor Ignotus, 2 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bonasso, Miguel. 1999. Don Alfredo. Buenos Aires: Ed. Planeta.Google Scholar
Burke‐White, William W. 2005. Complementarity in Practice: The International Criminal Court as Part of a System of Multi‐Level Global Governance in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Leiden Journal of International Law 18:557–590.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Domingo. 1997. El Peso de la Verdad, 6th ed. Buenos Aires: Ed. Planeta.Google Scholar
Caviglia, Franco, and Sanz, Christian. 1998. La Larga Sombra de Yabrán. Buenos Aires: Ed. Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Chehtman, Alejandro. 2010. The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CPI Report. 2000. Relatório da Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito. Brasilia: Congresso Nacional.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E. 2010. Does the Globalization of Anti‐Corruption Law Help Developing Countries? In International Economic Law, Globalization and Developing Countries, ed. Faundez, Julio and Tan, Celine. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., and Trebilcock, Michael J. 2008. “The Relationship Between Law and Development: Optimists Versus Skeptics.” American Journal of Comparative Law 56:895–946.Google Scholar
Duff, Antony. 2010. Authority and Responsibility in International Criminal Law. In The Philosophy of International Law, ed. Tasioulas, Samantha Besson and John, 589–604. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Luisa. 2014. O impacto das normas sobre foro especial no Caso TRT. In Estudos sobre o Caso TRT, ed. Machado, Maira and Ferreira, Luisa, 287–319. São Paulo: Editora Academica Livre. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/12028 (accessed October 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, and Krasner, Stephen D. 2003. The Limits of Idealism. Daedalus 132:47–63.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 2009. Recursivity of Global Normmaking: A Sociolegal Agenda. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:263–289.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven, eds. 2006. Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C. 1956. Transnational Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Liascovich, Carlos. 2004. Identidad Fallida. Master in Journalism Thesis. Universidad de San Andrés‐Clarín, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Machado, Maira. 2013. The TRT Case. IDRC Digital Library. http://idl‐bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/handle/10625/52302 (accessed October 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1999. Privatization South American Style. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattei, Ugo. 2003. A Theory of Imperial Law: A Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin Resistance. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10:383–448.Google Scholar
Nahat, Ricardo. 1991. Anatomia da Corrupção. São Paulo: R. Nahat.Google Scholar
Nassif, Luis. 2003. O jornalismo dos anos 90. São Paulo: Futura.Google Scholar
Nichols, Philip M. 1999. Are Extraterritorial Restrictions on Bribery a Viable and Desirable International Policy Goal Under the Global Conditions of the Late Twentieth Century? Increasing Global Security by Controlling Transnational Bribery. Michigan Journal of International Law 20:451–476.Google Scholar
Oduor, Jacinta, Fernando, Francisca, Flah, Agustin, Gottwald, Dorothee, Hauch, Jeanne, Mathias, Marianne et al. 2014. Left Out of the Bargain: Settlements in Foreign Bribery Cases and Implications for Asset Recovery. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://star.worldbank.org/star/sites/star/files/9781464800863.pdf (accessed October 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Parrish, Austen L. 2009. Reclaiming International Law from Extraterritoriality. Minnesota Law Review 93:815–874.Google Scholar
Pedone, Luis, dos Santos, Bruno, Valverde, Danielle, and dos Santos, Juliana. 2002. O Controle pelo legislativo. In Caminhos da Transparência. Análise dos componentes de um sistema nacional de integridade, ed. Speck, Bruno. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Porto, Mauro. 2011. The Media and Political Accountability. In Corruption and Democracy in Brazil. The Struggle for Accountability, ed. Power, Timothy and Taylor, Matthew, 103–125. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J., and Taylor, Matthew M., eds. 2011. Corruption and Democracy in Brazil. The Struggle for Accountability. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Rennó, Lucio. 2011. Corruption and Voting. In Corruption and Democracy in Brazil. The Struggle for Accountability, ed. Power, Timothy and Taylor, Matthew, 56–79. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Rochelle. 2014. Equilibrando a interdependência de jurisdições com a utilização de diferentes estratégias jurídicas. In Estudos sobre o Caso TRT, ed. Machado, Maira and Ferreira, Luisa, 163–187 São Paulo: Ed. Academica Livre. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/12028 (accessed October 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Rose‐Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. New York/Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose‐Ackerman, Susan. 2013. Introduction: The Role of International Actors in Fighting Corruption. In Anti‐Corruption Policy: Can International Actors Play a Constructive Role? ed. Rose‐Ackerman, Susan and Carrington, Paul. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Salbu, Steven R. 1999. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as a Threat to Global Harmony, Michigan Journal of International Law 20:419–449.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2008. Complaint Against Siemens AG. http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2008/comp20829.pdf (accessed October 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2012. Transnational Legal Process and State Change. Law & Social Inquiry 37:229–264.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton. & Co.Google Scholar
Soares, Boni. 2013. Early Restitution of Assets: The Nicolau dos Santos Neto Case. In Emerging Trends in Asset Recovery, ed. Zinkernagel, Gretta et al., 305–315. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno. 2002. Caminhos da Transparência. In Caminhos da Transparência. Análise dos componentes de um sistema nacional de integridade, ed. Speck, Bruno. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno. 2011. Auditing Institutions. In Corruption and Democracy in Brazil. The Struggle for Accountability, ed. Power, Timothy and Taylor, Matthew, 127–160. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew. 2011. The Federal Judiciary and the Electoral Courts. In Corruption and Democracy in Brazil. The Struggle for Accountability, ed. Power, Timothy and Taylor, Matthew, 162–182. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew, and Buranelli, Vinicius. 2007. Ending up in Pizza: Accountability as a Problem of Institutional Arrangement in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 49:59–87.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, and Korth, Peter. 2012. Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Fragmentation of World Society. In Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation, ed. Young, Margret, 23–54. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tulchin, Joseph S., and Espach, Ralph H., eds. 2000. Combating Corruption in Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Press.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice (US DOJ). 2008. Statement of Offense Siemens Argentina. http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/siemens‐argentina‐stmt.pdf (accessed October 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Verbitsky, Horacio. 1993. “Hacer la Corte: la construcción de un poder absoluto sin justicia ni control,” Planeta, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, Pub. L. No. 95‐213, § 102,91 Stat. 1494, codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(b), (d)(1), (g)–(h), 78dd‐1, 78dd‐2, 78dd‐3, 78ff; amended by Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Amendment of 1988 (part of Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988), Pub. L. 100‐418, 102 Stat. 1107, 1415 (1988), and International Anti‐Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105‐366, 112 Stat. 3302 (1998).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, November 21, 1997, 37 I.L.M. 4 (1998).Google Scholar
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/9 (July 17, 1998).Google Scholar
UN Convention Against Corruption, in force 14 December 2005.Google Scholar
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, Pub. L. No. 95‐213, § 102,91 Stat. 1494, codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(b), (d)(1), (g)–(h), 78dd‐1, 78dd‐2, 78dd‐3, 78ff; amended by Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Amendment of 1988 (part of Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988), Pub. L. 100‐418, 102 Stat. 1107, 1415 (1988), and International Anti‐Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105‐366, 112 Stat. 3302 (1998).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, November 21, 1997, 37 I.L.M. 4 (1998).Google Scholar
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/9 (July 17, 1998).Google Scholar
UN Convention Against Corruption, in force 14 December 2005.Google Scholar