Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:49:09.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Impact Analysis of Judge-Made Products Liability Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

James L. Croyle
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper assesses the impact of changes in products liability law by measuring liability insurance expenditures. Expenditure for liability insurance premiums is used as an index of resource redistribution from sellers of defective products to individuals who have been harmed by such products. Using multiple regression, comparative state data are analyzed for the period immediately prior to the enactment of the Consumer Products Safety Act in 1972, when doctrines concerning manufacturers' liability for defective products were changing in the direction of stricter negligence standards and thus greater liability for the manufacturer. Three types of products liability policies were in effect among the 50 states at that time. They were strict liability in tort, negligence plus warranty with no privity requirement, and negligence plus warranty with privity of contract required. Data from states with strict liability policies are compared with data from states where the negligence plus warranty standards were used. In states where manufacturers were subject to greater liability for defective products, more money was spent on liability insurance. This example from one area of tort law shows that common law decisions can have important social effects, and suggests a method for measuring those effects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , Summer 1979 , pp. 949 - 967
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Law and Society Association.

References

AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE (1965) Restatement (2nd) of Torts § 402(a).Google Scholar
BROWN, John Prather (1973) “Toward an Economic Theory of Liability,” 2 Journal of Legal Studies 323.Google Scholar
CALABRESI, Guido (1970) The Costs of Accidents. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
CHELIUS, James (1976) “Liability for Industrial Accidents: A Comparison of Negligence and Strict Liability Systems,” 5 Journal of Legal Studies 293.Google Scholar
COASE, R. H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost,” 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1.Google Scholar
CROYLE, James L. (1976) “Private Law and Public Policy,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Government Department, Harvard University.Google Scholar
DAWSON, Richard (1967) “Social Development, Party Competition, and Policy,” in Chambers, W. and Burnham, W. D. (eds.), The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DAWSON, Richard E. and James A., ROBINSON (1963) “Interparty Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Policies in the American States,” 25 Journal of Politics 265.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm (1973) “Power, Impact and the Supreme Court,” in Becker, T. and Feeley, M. (eds.), The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions (2nd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Melvin (1971) “Strict Liability in Products Cases,” in American Trial Lawyers Association, 25th Annual Convention Proceedings. Cincinatti: W. H. Anderson Co.Google Scholar
GILLAM, Cornelius (1958) “Products Liability in a Nutshell,” 37 Oregon Law Review 119.Google Scholar
HANSON, Roger and Robert, CREW (1973) “The Policy Impact of Reapportionment,” 8 Law and Society Review 69.Google Scholar
HANUSHEK, Eric and John, JACKSON (1977) Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Richard M. (1967) The Dynamics of Compliance. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard (1966) “Strategies of Research Design in the Legal Impact Study,” 1 Law and Society Review 111.Google Scholar
LEVINE, James P. (1970) “Methodological Concerns in Studying Supreme Court Efficacy,” 4 Law and Society Review 583.Google Scholar
MUIR, William K. Jr. (1967) Prayer in the Public Schools: Law and Attitude Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard (1972) “A Theory of Negligence,” 1 Journal of Legal Studies 29.Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard (1973) “Strict Liability: A Comment,” 2 Journal of Legal Studies 205.Google Scholar
PROSSER, William (1960) “The Assault upon the Citadel,” 69 Yale Law Journal 1099.Google Scholar
PROSSER, William (1966) “The Fall of the Citadel,” 50 Minnesota Law Review 791.Google Scholar
PROSSER, William (1971) Law of Torts (4th edition). St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
PROSSER, William and John, WADE (1971) Cases and Materials on Torts (5th edition). Brooklyn: The Foundation Press, Inc.Google Scholar
RODGERS, Harrell R. Jr. and Charles S., BULLOCK III (1972) Law and Social Change. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
SHAPIRO, Martin M. (1970) “Decentralized Decision-Making in the Law of Torts,” in Ulmer, S. (ed.), Political Decision Making. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
SHAPIRO, Martin M. (1972) “From Public Law to Public Policy, or the ‘Public’ in ‘Public Law,‘” 5 P.S. 413.Google Scholar
SHARKANSKY, Ira and Richard I., HOFFERBERT (1969) “Dimensions of State Politics, Economics, and Public Policy,” 63 American Political Science Review 867.Google Scholar
WALD, Michael (1967) “Interrogations in New Haven: The Impact of Miranda,” 76 Yale Law Journal 1521.Google Scholar
U.S. National Commission on Product Safety (1971) The Consumer's Guide to Product Safety. Ed. by Ronald Bruce. New York: Award Books.Google Scholar
WASBY, Stephen L. (1970) The Impact of the U.S. The Impact of the U.S: Some Perspectives. Homewood, Ill.: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
WILLISTON, Samuel (1948) The Law Governing Sales of Goods. New York: Baker, Voorhis.Google Scholar
WONNACOT, Ronald J. and Thomas H., WONNACOT (1970) Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar