Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:59:59.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Designated Diffidence: District Court Judges on the Courts of Appeals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

James J. Brudney  and
Corey Ditslear
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since 1980, District Court Judges, designated pursuant to federal statute, have helped decide over 75,000 court of appeals cases—nearly one of every five merits decisions. Although scholars and judges have warned that the presence of these visitors on appellate panels may undermine consistency, legitimacy, or collegiality, little empirical evidence exists related to such concerns. Working with an especially complete data set of labor law opinions, the authors found that district court visitors perform in a much more diffident fashion than their appellate colleagues. They contribute notably fewer majority opinions and dissents. In addition, their participations do not reflect their professional or personal backgrounds to nearly the same degree as their appellate colleagues do when voting on labor law matters. The authors' findings and analyses regarding the behavior of designated district judges should be of interest to appellate courts considering the challenges of caseload management and to scholars studying processes and outcomes in the courts of appeal.

Type
Papers of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , 2001 , pp. 565 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

We thank Lawrence Baum, Douglas Berman, Victor Brudney, Deborah Merritt, Joseph Sanders, Kevin Scott, Richard Timpone, an esteemed district judge within our database who wishes to remain anonymous, and several anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions; Susanna Marlowe, Elizabeth Pevehouse, and Stephanie Smith for excellent research assistance; and Michele Newton for splendid secretarial support. The Fund for Labor Relations Studies and The Ohio State University each contributed generous financial assistance for this project.

References

References

Abrahamson, Shirley S. (1993) “Judging in the Quiet of the Storm,” 24 St. Mary's Law J. 965–93.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., & Nelson, Forrest D. (1984) Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Alexander, A. Lamar Jr. (1965) “Note, En Banc Hearings in the Federal Courts of Appeals: Accommodating Institutional Responsibilities,” 40 New York Univ. Law Rev. 563–608.Google Scholar
Aliotta, Jilda M. (1988) “Combining Judges' Attributes and Case Characteristics: An Alternative Approach to Explaining Supreme Court Decisionmaking,” 71 Judicature 277–81.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (1991) Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary: What It Is and How It Works.Google Scholar
American Judicature Society (1988) Handbook for Judicial Nominating Commissioners.Google Scholar
Annual Reports of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (1980–2000).Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, Eisenberg, Theodore, & Schwab, Stewart J. (1995) “Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes,” 24 J. of Legal Studies 257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Thomas A. (1994) Rationing Justice on Appeal: The Problems of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (1997) The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiner, Theresa M. (1999) “What Will Diversity on the Bench Mean for Justice?,” 6 Michigan J. of Gender & Law 113–54.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, & Hall, Melinda Gann (1990) “Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts,” 52 J. of Politics 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. Robert Jr., & Lee, Allison Herren (2000) “Neutral Assignment of Judges at the Court of Appeals,” 78 Texas Law Rev. 1037–1116.Google Scholar
Brudney, James J. (1996) “A Famous Victory: Collective Bargaining Protections and the Statutory Aging Process,” 74 North Carolina Law Rev. 939–1036.Google Scholar
Brudney, James J., Schiavoni, Sara, & Merritt, Deborah J. (1999) “Judicial Hostility Toward Labor Unions? Applying the Social Background Model to a Celebrated Concern,” 60 Ohio State Law J. 1675–1771.Google Scholar
Bushnell, George E. Jr. (1995) “President's Message,” 81 American Bar Association J. 8 (July).Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin (1921) The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Carp, Robert A., Songer, Donald R., Rowland, C. K., Stidham, Ronald, & Richey, Tracy L. (1993) “The Voting Behavior of Judges Appointed by President Bush,” 76 Judicature 298–302.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul (1969) “Crowded Dockets and the Courts of Appeals: The Threat to the Function of Review and the National Law,” 82 Harvard Law Rev. 542–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cartter Report on the Leading Schools of Education, Law, and Business“ (1977) Change (Feb.), 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Charles E., & Trubek, David M. (1961) “The Creative Role of the Judge: Restraint and Freedom in the Common Law Tradition,” 71 Yale Law J. 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, President William J. (1999) “Remarks to the American Bar Association in Atlanta, Georgia, Aug. 9, 1999,” Reprinted in 35 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents 1600–04.Google Scholar
Coffin, Frank M. (1980) The Ways of a Judge. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mark A. (1991) “Explaining Judicial Behavior or What's ‘Unconstitutional’ about the Sentencing Commission,” 7 J. Law, Economics, & Organization 183–99.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. (1997) “Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance,” 92 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 251–326.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B., & Tiller, Emerson H. (1998) “Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals,” 107 Yale Law J. 2155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, Nancy (November 1997) “Gender and the Courts: A Look at the Diversification of the Federal Bench.” Presented at the Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics (copy on file with authors).Google Scholar
Davis, Sue, Haire, Susan, & Songer, Donald R. (1993) “Voting Behavior and Gender on the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” 77 Judicature 129–33.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry T. (1983) “The Role of a Judge in Modern Society: Some Reflections on Current Practice in Federal Appellate Adjudication,” 32 Cleveland State Law Rev. 385–430.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry T. (1998) “Collegiality and Decision Making on the D.C. Circuit,” 84 Virginia Law Rev. 1335–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, John (1991) Regression Diagnostics. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Jerome (1932) “What Courts Do in Fact,” 26 Illinois Law Rev. 645–66.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry R. (1993) Courts, Politics and Justice, 3d Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1975) “Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited,” 69 American Political Science Rev. 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1991) “The Bush Imprint on the Judiciary: Carrying on a Tradition,” 74 Judicature 294–306.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1997) Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt Through Reagan. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon, & Slotnick, Elliot (1999) “Clinton's Second Term Judiciary: Picking Judges under Fire,” 82 Judicature 264–84.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon, Slotnick, Elliot, Gryski, Gerard S., & Zuk, Gary (2001) “Clinton's Judges: Summing Up the Legacy,” 84 Judicature 228–54.Google Scholar
Green, Justin J., & Atkins, Burton M. (1978) “Designated Judges: How Well Do They Perform?” 61 Judicature 358–70.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. (1997) Econometric Analysis, 3d Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gryski, Gerard S., & Main, Eleanor C. (1986) “Social Backgrounds as Predictors of Votes on State Courts of Last Resort: The Case of Sex Discrimination,” 39 Western Political Q. 528–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. Woodford Jr. (1981) Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Judith S. (1988) “The Human Dimension in Appellate Judging: A Brief Reflection on a Timeless Concern,” 73 Cornell Law Rev. 1004–15.Google Scholar
King, Gary (1998) Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, & Wittenberg, Jason (2000) “Making the Most of Statistical Analysis: Improving Interpretation and Presentation,” 44 American J. Political Science 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ivy, & Maykovich, Minako (1995) Statistics: A Tool for Understanding Society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Liao, Tim Futing (1994) Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Independent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lumbard, J. Edward (1968) “Current Problems of the Federal Courts of Appeals,” 54 Cornell Law Rev. 29–44.Google Scholar
McKenna, Judith A. (1993) Structural and Other Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals: Report to the United States Congress and the Judicial Conference of the United States. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Meador, Daniel John, & Bernstein, Jordana Simone (1994) Appellate Courts in the United States. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah Jones, & Brudney, James J. (2001) “Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication in the United States Courts of Appeals,” 54 Vanderbilt Law Rev. 71–121.Google Scholar
Moore, David (1997) Statistics: Concepts and Controversies, 4th Ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Nagel, Stuart S. (1961) “Political Party Affiliation and Judges Decisions,” 55 American Political Science Rev. 843–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Stuart S. (1974) “Multiple Correlation of Judicial Backgrounds and Decisions,” 2 Florida State Law Rev. 258–80.Google Scholar
Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force (1994) “The Effects of Gender in the Federal Courts: The Final Report of the Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force,” 67 Southern California Law Rev. 745–1106.Google Scholar
Note (1963) “The Second Circuit: Federal Judicial Administration in Microcosm,” 63 Columbia Law Rev. 874–908.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Sandra Day (1992) “Thurgood Marshall: The Influence of a Raconteur,” 44 Stanford Law Rev. 1217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1986) “Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution,” 37 Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 179–217.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1993) “Legal Scholarship Today,” 45 Stanford Law Rev. 1647–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1995) Overcoming Law. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Stephen (1999) “Dialogue: Good Judging,” 2 The Green Bag (2d series) 299–307.Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard (1997) “Environmental Regulation, Ideology, and the D.C. Circuit” 83 Virginia Law Rev. 1717–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robel, Lauren K. (1990) “Caseload and Judging: Judicial Adaptations to Caseload,” 1990 Brigham Young University Law Rev. 3–65.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. K., & Carp, Robert A. (1996) Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Saphire, Richard A., & Solimine, Michael E. (1995) “Diluting Justice on Appeal? An Examination of the Use of District Court Judges Sitting by Designation on the United States Courts of Appeals,” 28 Univ. Michigan J. Law Reform 351–407.Google Scholar
Schafran, Lynn Hecht (1991) “At Issue: Supreme Court Nominees: Should Race and Gender Be Factors in Choosing Justices?” 77 American Bar Association J. 38.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Mary M. (1990) “Compassion on Appeal,” 22 Arizona State Law J. 45–52.Google Scholar
Seitz, Collins J. (1991) “Collegiality and the Court of Appeals,” 75 Judicature 26–27.Google Scholar
Shepard, Scott (1992) “On the Issues,” Atlanta J. & Constitution (Mar. 10), A-11.Google Scholar
Singer, Amy (1999) “Numbers Too Big to Ignore,” The American Lawyer (Mar.) 5–6.Google Scholar
Sirkin, R. Mark (1995) Statistics for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sisk, Gregory C., Heise, Michael, & Morriss, Andrew (1998) “Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning,” 73 New York Univ. Law Rev. 1377–1500.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E. (1983) “Federal Trial and Appellate Judges: How Do They Differ?” 36 Western Political Q. 570–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R. (1991) “The Circuit Courts of Appeals,“ in Gates, J. B. & Johnson, C. A., eds., The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., & Davis, Sue (1990) “The Impact of Party and Region on Voting Decisions in the United States Courts of Appeals, 1955–1986,” 43 Western Political Q. 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stienstra, Donna, & Cecil, Joe S. (1989) The Role of Staff Attorneys and Face-to-Face Conferencing in Non-Argument Decisionmaking. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal (1981) “Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions,” 75 American Political Science Rev. 355–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, & Handberg, Roger (1991) “Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916–1988,” 85 American Political Science Rev. 460–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiller, Emerson H., & Cross, Frank B. (1999) “A Modest Proposal for Improving American Justice,” 99 Columbia Law Rev. 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, S. Sidney (1970) “Dissent Behavior and the Social Background of Supreme Court Justices,” 32 J. of Politics 580–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, Kenneth N. (1964) “Federal District Judges and Race Relations in the South,” 26 J. of Politics 337–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Patricia (1984) “Essay: Thoughts on Decisionmaking,” 87 West Virginia Law Rev. 1–12.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia (1995) “The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric,” 62 Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 1371–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Patricia M. (1999) “A Response to Tiller and Cross,” 99 Columbia Law Rev. 235–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L. (1981) “Extra Judges in a Federal Appellate Court: The Ninth Circuit,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 369–84.Google Scholar
West's Federal Reporter, 710 F.2d (Westgroup 1984) and 914 F.2d (Westgroup 1991).Google Scholar
Williams, Joan Chalmers (1996) “At the Fusion of Horizons: Incommensurability and the Public Interest,” 20 Vermont Law Rev. 625–45.Google Scholar
Working Committees to the Second Circuit Task Force (1997) “Report of the Working Committees to the Second Circuit Task Force on Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts,” 1997 Annual Survey of American Law 117–414.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984).Google Scholar

Federal Statutes and Rules Cited

National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) 29 U.S.C. §§ 151–169 (1994).Google Scholar
28 U.S.C. § 292(a), (d) (1994).Google Scholar
Ninth Circuit Rules, Introduction, E.5..Google Scholar
Sixth Circuit Memorandum entitled ”Panel Composition and Assignment of Cases.”..Google Scholar