Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:38:41.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Research Strategies in Urban Legal Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Joel F. Handler
Joel F. Handler*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The subject matter of field research in urban legal studies is as broad or as narrow as we choose to define the field. The chief concern of this paper is research strategies. What type of research is a law school capable of doing? What type of research is appropriate—for a professional school that is part of a university and for a student body that is growing increasingly bored and frustrated at what it regards as an irrelevant curriculum?

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , February 1971 , pp. 345 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 The Law and Society Association.

References

Cases

In re GAULT 387 U.S. 1 (1967).Google Scholar
GOLDBERG v. KELLY 90 S.Ct. 1011 (1970).Google Scholar
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA 384 U.S. 436 (1966).Google Scholar
WYMAN v. JAMES 302 F. Supp. 478 (D.C.N.Y. 1969), Reversed, _____U.S. _____, 39 U.S. Law Week 4085 (1971).Google Scholar

References

HANDLER, J. F. (1969) “Justice for the welfare recipient: fair hearings in AFDC–the Wisconsin experience.” Social Service Rev. 43 (March): 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HANDLER, J. F. (1968) “The role of legal research and legal education in social welfare.” Stanford Law Rev. 20 (April): 669–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REICH, C.A. (1965) “Individual rights and social welfare: the emerging legal issues.” Yale Law J. 74 (June): 1245–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REICH, C.A. (1963) “Midnight welfare searches and the Social Security Act.” Yale Law J. 72 (June): 1347–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten BROEK, J. (1965) “California's dual system of family law; its origin, development, and present status, part III.” Stanford Law Rev. 17 (April): 614–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar