Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:55:49.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and Economics: The Road Not Taken

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

John J. Donohue III
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the rational study of the law the black-letter man may be the man of the present, but the man of the future is the man of statistics and the master of economics.

Oliver Wendell Holmes (1921: 83)

I do not see how one can grasp the meaning of law within society except from the vantage point of social science.

Lawrence M. Friedman (1986: 780)

Since both law and society and law and economics apply social science concepts and methods to the problems of the legal system, one might think that the two disciplines are natural allies. Indeed, with the largely empirical focus of law and society and the strong emphasis on theory in law and economics, the benefits from collaboration between the two would seem to be particularly great. Perhaps surprisingly, though, they have often been at odds with one another, with both groups willing to concede only grudgingly that the other has made useful contributions to the study of legal and public policy issues. The hostility is reflected in the fact that, at recent law and society meetings, very few devotees of law and economics have been in attendance, either as speakers or as members of the audience. What then can explain this chill?

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , 1988 , pp. 903 - 926
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

The author thanks Ian Ayres, Peter Siegelman, and Rayman Solomon for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

*

The paper is by John Lott, who argues that a year in jail is not an equivalent punishment for both rich and poor since the wealthier defendant presumably has higher earnings, and thus loses more than his impecunious cellmate by being confined in prison. In order to restore balance to the system, Lott argues, we must reduce the expected punishment of the rich—i.e., the probability of conviction times the length of incarceration if convicted. One way to achieve this goal is to enable the rich to use their wealth to “buy” a decreased probability of conviction, through the aid of high-priced criminal defense attorneys (Lott, 1987: 1310).

References

References

ACKERMAN, Bruce (ed.) (1975) Economic Foundations of Property Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
AIVAZIAN, Varouj A., and Jeffrey L., CALLEN (1981) “The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core,” 14 Journal of Law and Economics 175.Google Scholar
AKERLOF, George A. (1985) “Discriminatory, Status-based Wages among Tradition-oriented, Stochastically Trading Coconut Producers,” 93 Journal of Political Economy 265.Google Scholar
AKERLOF, George A. (1984) An Economic Theorist's Book of Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALEXIS, Marcus (1974) “The Political Economy of Labor Market Discrimination: Synthesis and Exploration,” in Horowitz, , And Von Furstenberg, A., G., (eds.), Patterns of Discrimination. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath-Lexington Books.Google Scholar
ARROW, Kenneth (1981) “Optimal and Voluntary Income Distribution,” in Rosefielde, S., (ed.), Economic Welfare arid the Economics of Soviet Socialism. Cambrdge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ATKINSON, Anthony B. (1987) “Income Maintenance and Social Insurance,” in Auerbach, A. and Feldstein, M. (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
BARRO, Robert (1974) “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?,” 82 Journal of Political Economy 1095.Google Scholar
BEBCHUK, Lucian A. (1984) “Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information,” 15 Rand Journal of Economics 404.Google Scholar
BINMORE, Ken, Ariel, RUBINSTEIN, and Asher, WOLINSKY (1986) “The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling,” 17 Rand Journal of Economics 176.Google Scholar
BLOCK, Michael K., and Joseph Gregory, SIDAK (1980) “The Cost of Antitrust Deterrence: Why Not Hang a Price Fixer Now and Then?,” 68 Georgetown Law Journal 1131.Google Scholar
BOADWAY, Robin W. (1979) Public Sector Economics. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
BORK, Robert (1977) The Antitrust Paradox. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
BOUND, John (1988) “The Health and Earnings of Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants,” unpublished manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CALABRESI, Guido, and A. Douglas, MELAMED (1972) “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” 85 Harvard Law Review 1089.Google Scholar
COASE, Ronald H. (1981) “The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core: A Comment,” 14 Journal of Law and Economics 1.Google Scholar
COASE, Ronald H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost,” 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1.Google Scholar
COASE, Ronald H. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm,” 4 Economica 386.Google Scholar
COLANDER, David, and Arjo, KLAMER (1987) “The Making of an Economist,” 1 The Journal of Economic Perspectives 95.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert (1982) “The Cost of Coase,” 11 The Journal of Legal Studies 1.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert, and Thomas, ULEN (1987) Law and Economics. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
DONOHUE, John J. (1987a) “Further Thoughts on Employment Discrimination Legislation: A Reply to Judge Posner,” 136 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 523.Google Scholar
DONOHUE, John J. (1987b) “Diverting the Coasean River: Incentive Schemes to Reduce Unemployment Spells,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
DONOHUE, John J. (1986) “Is Title VII Efficient?,” 134 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1411.Google Scholar
DONOHUE, John J., and Ian, AYRES (1987) “Posner's Symphony No. 3: Thinking about the Unthinkable,” 39 Stanford Law Review 791.Google Scholar
EASTERBROOK, Frank H. (1984) “The Supreme Court, 1983 Term—Foreword: The Court and the Economic System,” 98 Harvard Law Review 4.Google Scholar
ELLICKSON, Robert C. (1986) “Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County,” 38 Stanford Law Review 623.Google Scholar
ELLWOOD, David T., and Lawrence H., SUMMERS (1986) “Is Welfare Really the Problem?,” The Public Interest 57.Google Scholar
EHRLICH, Isaac (1975) “The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Matter of Life and Death,” 65 American Economic Review 397.Google Scholar
FARBER, Daniel (1986) “The Case against Brilliance,” 70 Minnesota Law Review 917.Google Scholar
FARRELL, Joseph (1987) “Information and the Coase Theorem,” 1 The Journal of Economic Perspectives 113.Google Scholar
FREY, Bruno S., Werner W., POMMEREHNE, Friedrich, SCHNEIDER, and G., GILBERT (1984) “Consensus and Dissension among Economists: An Empirical Inquiry,” 74 American Economic Review 986.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, David D. (1980) “In Defense of Thomas Aquinas and the Just Price,” 12 History of Political Economy 234.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1986) “The Law and Society Movement,” 38 Stanford Law Review 763.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Milton (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
GILOVICH, Thomas, Robert, VALLONE, and Amos, TVERSKY (1985) “The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences,” 17 Cognitive Psychology 295.Google Scholar
GILDER, George (1981) Wealth and Poverty. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
GRANOVETTER, Mark S. (1973) “The Strength of Weak Ties,” 78 American Sociological Review 1360.Google Scholar
HANNAN, Timothy H. (1982) “Bank Robberies and Bank Security Precautions,” 11 Journal of Legal Studies 83.Google Scholar
HIRSCH, Werner Z. (1979) Law and Economics: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HOCHMAN, Harold M. and James D., ROGERS, (1969) “Pareto Optimal Redistribution,” 59 American Economic Review 542.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Elizabeth, and Matthew, SPITZER (1987) “Fear and Loathing in the Coase Theorem: Experimental Tests Involving Physical Discomfort,” 16 Journal of Legal Studies 217.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Elizabeth, and Matthew, SPITZER (1986) “Experimental Tests of the Coase Theorem With Large Bargaining Groups,” 15 Journal of Legal Studies 149.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Elizabeth, and Matthew, SPITZER (1985) “Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice,” 14 Journal of Legal Studies 259.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Elizabeth, and Matthew, SPITZER (1982) “The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests,” 25 Journal of Law and Economics 73.Google Scholar
HOLMES, Oliver W. (1921) “The Path of the Law,” in Lerner, Max (ed.), The Mind and Faith of Justice Holmes. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
JENSEN, Michael C. (1969) “Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios,” 42 J. Bus. 167.Google Scholar
KAHNEMAN, D. and A., TVERSKY (1979) “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” 47 Econometrica 263.Google Scholar
KELMAN, Mark (1980) “Spitzer and Hoffman on Coase: A Brief Rejoinder,” 53 Southern California Law Review 1215.Google Scholar
KELMAN, Mark (1979) “Consumption Theory, Production Theory, and Ideology in the Coase Theorem,” 52 Southern California Law Review 669.Google Scholar
KRUEGER, Ann O. (1963) “The Economics of Discrimination,” 71 Journal of Political Economy 481.Google Scholar
LACHMAN, Judith A. (1984) “Knowing and Showing Economics and Law,” 93 Yale Law Journal 1587.Google Scholar
LANDES, William (1968) “The Economics of Fair Employment Laws,” 76 Journal of Political Economy 507.Google Scholar
LOTT, John R. (1987) “Should the Wealthy be Able to 'Buy Justice'?,” 95 Journal of Political Economy 1307.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
MARKOVITS, Richard S. (1975) “A Basic Structure For Microeconomic Policy Analysis in Our Worse-than-second-best World: A Proposal and Related Critique of the Chicago Approach to the Study of Law and Economics,” 1975 Wisconsin Law Review 950.Google Scholar
MANNE, Henry G. (1966) Insider Trading and the Stock Market. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
MARWELL, Gerald, and Ruth, AMES (1981) “Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else?,” 15 Journal of Public Economics 295.Google Scholar
McCORMICK, Robert E., and Robert D., TOLLISON (1986) “Crime and Income Distribution in a Basketball Economy,” 6 International Review of Law and Economics 115.Google Scholar
McMANUS, Walter S. (1985) “Estimates of the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: The Importance of the Researcher's Prior Beliefs,” 93 Journal of Political Economy 417.Google Scholar
MURRAY, Charles (1984) Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
NICHOLS, A.L. and Zeckhauser, Richard, (1982) “Targeting Transfers through Restrictions on Recipients,” 72 American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 373.Google Scholar
PAULY, Mark V. (1973) “Income Redistribution as a Local Public Good,” 2 Journal of Public Economics 35.Google Scholar
POLINSKY, A. Mitchell (1980) “Resolving Nuisance Disputes: The Simple Economics of Injunctive and Damage Remedies,” 32 Stanford Law Review 1075.Google Scholar
POLINSKY, A. Mitchell (1980) An Introduction to Law and Economics. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard A. (1988) “The Law and Economics Movement,” 77 American Economic Review 1 (Papers and Proceedings).Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard A. (1987) “The Efficiency and Efficacy of Title VII,” 136 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 513.Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard A. (1986) Economic Analysis of Law, (3d ed.) Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
PRIEST, George L. (1985) “Reexamining the Selection Hypothesis: Learning from Wittman's Mistakes,” 14 Journal of Legal Studies 215.Google Scholar
PRIEST, George, and Benjamin, KLEIN (1985) “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation,” 13 Journal of Legal Studies 1.Google Scholar
RAPPAPORT, Peter (1988) “Reply to Professor Hennipman,” 26 Journal of Economic Literature 86.Google Scholar
REA, Samuel A. (1980) “Nonpecuniary Loss and Breach of Contract,” 11 Journal of Legal Studies 35.Google Scholar
REGAN, Donald (1972) “The Problem of Social Cost Revisited,” 15 Journal of Law and Economics 427 (1972).Google Scholar
REINGANUM, Jennifer F., and Louis L., WILDE (1986) “Settlement, Litigation, and the Allocation of Litigation Costs,” 17 Rand Journal of Economics 557.Google Scholar
RHOADS, Steven E. (1985) The Economist's View of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SAMUELSON, Paul A. (1984) “Evaluating Reaganomics,” Challenge 4 (November/December).Google Scholar
SAMUELSON, Paul A. (1964) “Public Goods and Subscription TV: Correction of the Record,” 7 Journal of Law and Economics 81.Google Scholar
SCHUMAN, Howard, Charlotte, STEEH, and Lawrence, BOBO (1986) Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
SCHWAB, Stewart (1988) “A Coasean Experiment on Contract Presumptions,” 17 Journal of Legal Studies 237.Google Scholar
SPITZER, Mark, and Elizabeth, HOFFMAN (1980) “A Reply to 'Consumption Theory, Production Theory, and Ideology in the Coase Theorem,'” 53 Southern California Law Review 1187.Google Scholar
SOLOW, Robert M. (1988) “The Wide, Wide World of Wealth,” The New York Times Book Review, March 20, 1988, 3.Google Scholar
TOBIN, James (1980) Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
WILLIAMSON, Oliver (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
WILLIAMSON, Oliver (1975) Markets and Hierarchies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
WITTMAN, Donald (1985) “Is the Selection of Cases for Trial Biased?,” 14 Journal of Legal Studies 185.Google Scholar
ZECKHAUSER, Richard (1971) “Optimal Mechanisms for Income Transfer,” 61 American Economic Review 324.Google Scholar
ZERBE, Richard O. (1980) “The Problem of Social Cost in Retrospect,” 2 Research in Law and Economics 83.Google Scholar
ZERBE, Richard O. (1976) “The Problem of Social Cost: Fifteen Years Later,” in Lin, Steven A. Y. (ed.), Theory and Measurement of Economic Externalities 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar