Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:21:53.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plea Contracts in West Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1979

William L. F. Felstiner
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many routine criminal cases in central Europe are concluded by an abbreviated process known as the penal order. The penal order is a written proposal by the state to a defendant stipulating the crime committed and the penalty to be levied if the defendant does not object. This paper describes the West German version of the penal order and argues that it avoids some of the negative practices allegedly inherent in American plea bargaining.

Type
Comparative Perspectives
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Winter 1979 , pp. 309 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

This research was conducted under grants 75-NI-99-0069 and 78-NI-AX-0049 from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice. I very much appreciate the cooperation and counsel of Gunther Arzt, Erhard Blankenburg, Johannes Feest, Joachim Herrmann, Hans Kerner, and Karl Schumann in Germany, and Richard Abel, George Fletcher, John Langbein, and Jan Stepan in the U.S. The conclusions in the paper are mine alone.

References

ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1968) “The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining,” 36 University of Chicago Law Review 50.Google Scholar
ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1975) “The Defense Attorney's Role in Plea Bargaining,” 84 Yale Law Journal 1179.Google Scholar
BEDFORD, Sybille (1961) The Faces of Justice. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, Erhard, Klaus, SESSAR and Wiebke, STEFFEN (1978) Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozess Socialer Kontrolle. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
BRUNS, Hans-Jürgen (1974) Strafzumessungsrecht (2d ed.). Köln: Carl Heymanns.Google Scholar
DECKER, Gerhard (n.d.) Die Einstellung des Ermittlungsverfahrens unter Auflagen gem. § 153a StPO in der Praxis der Staatsanwaltschaft. Doctoral Dissertion, Faculty of Law, Universität Augsburg.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm (1979) The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F. and Ann B., DREW (1978) European Alternatives to Criminal Trials and Their Applicability in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Abraham S. and Marvin, MARCUS (1977) “The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three ‘Inquisitorial’ Systems: France, Italy and Germany,” 87 Yale Law Journal 240.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Abraham S. (1978) “Comment on Continental Criminal Procedure” 87 Yale Law Journal 1570.Google Scholar
HERRMANN, Joachim (1974) “The Rule of Compulsory Prosecution and the Scope of Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany,” 41 University of Chicago Law Review 468.Google Scholar
JESCHEK, Hans-Heinrich (1970) “The Discretionary Powers of the Prosecuting Attorney in West Germany,” 18 American Journal of Comparative Law 508.Google Scholar
LANGBEIN, John H. (1974) “Controlling Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany,” 41 University of Chicago Law Review 439.Google Scholar
LANGBEIN, John H. and Lloyd, WEINREB (1978) “Continental Criminal Procedure: ‘Myth’ and Reality,” 87 Yale Law Journal 1549.Google Scholar
LÖWE-ROSENBERG, R. (1978) Die Strafprozessordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz (vol. 4, 23rd ed.). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
SCHUMANN, Karl F. (1977) Der Handel mit Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
STEFFEN, Wiebke (1976) “Analysis of Police Investigative Activities from the Viewpoint of the Later Criminal Trial.” Presented at the International Seminar on Police Research at Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
STEPAN, Jan (1973) “Possible Lessons from Continental Criminal Procedure” in Rottenberg, Simon (ed.) The Economics of Crime and Punishment. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
WHITMAN, Peter A. (1967) “Recent Developments—Judicial Plea Bargaining,” 19 Stanford Law Review 1082.Google Scholar
YALE LAW JOURNAL (1956) “Comment: The Influence of the Defendant's Plea on Judicial Determination of Sentence,” 66 Yale Law Journal 204.Google Scholar