Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:22:56.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reformers V. Abolitionists: Some notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1979

Jonathan D. Casper
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Philosophical Implications
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Winter 1979 , pp. 567 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Law and Society Association.

References

ALSCHULER, Albert (1968) “The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining,” 36 University of Chicago Law Review 50.Google Scholar
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. PROJECT ON MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE (1967) Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty. New York: Institute for Judicial Administration.Google Scholar
BALDWIN, John and McCONVILLE, Michael (1977) Negotiated Justice. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
BLUMBERG, Abraham S. (1967) Criminal Justice. New York: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
CASPER, Jonathan D. (1972) American Criminal Justice: The Defendant's Perspective. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Abraham and Marvin, MARCUS (1977) “The Myth of Judicial Supremacy in Three ‘Inquistorial’ Systems,” 80 Yale Law Journal 240.Google Scholar
GROSS, Avrum M. (1978) “Plea Bargaining—The Alaska Experience.” Presented at the Special National Workshop on Plea Bargaining, French Lick, Indiana, June 14-17.Google Scholar
HEUMANN, Milton (1975) “A Note on Plea Bargaining and Case Pressure,” 9 Law & Society Review 515.Google Scholar
HEUMANN, Milton (1978) Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LANGBEIN, John H. and Lloyd, WEINREB (1978) “Continental Criminal Procedure: ‘Myth’ and Reality,” 87 Yale Law Journal 1549.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1974) “Some Determinants of the Method of Case Disposition: Decision-Making by Public Defenders in Los Angeles,” 8 Law & Society Review 187.Google Scholar
PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE (1967) Task Force Report: The Courts. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
ROSETT, Arthur I. and Donald R., CRESSEY (1976) Justice by Consent: Plea Bargains in the American Courthouse. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
WILKINS, Leslie T. (1976) Sentencing Guidelines: Structuring Judicial Discretion. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
UTZ, Pamela J. (1978) Settling the Facts: Discretion and Negotiation in Criminal Court. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar