Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:24:42.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying the Frequency of Civil Litigation in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1975

Erhard Blankenburg
Erhard Blankenburg*
Affiliation:
Berlin Wissenschaftszentrum
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Little is known about the factors influencing the frequency of civil litigation. Courts do not seek their clientele actively. Rather, they wait for litigants to bring cases to them. The determinants of litigation thus have to be sought primarily outside the courts: they have to be sought by analysis of the frequency of all conflicts which are relevant to legal regulation. Conflict of itself does not produce a civil suit: there has to be some initiative to bring the issue before the court. Although we do not know the total population of all law-relevant conflicts (that is, all conflicts which might possibly be regulated by law), we may safely assume that there is a selection process which sifts out all but a small proportion of all potential conflicts. Here, conditions within the courts (among others) enter: the more expeditiously civil suits are handled, the less costly, the more accessible courts are to lay people, the more readily they will take their issues to court.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 9 , Issue 2: Litigation and Dispute Processing: Part II , Winter 1975 , pp. 307 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

*

I am indebted to Peter Macnaughton-Smith and Marc Galanter whose comments on a prior draft helped me to put my idea more clearly, and who helped me in climbing over some of the language barriers.

References

ABEL-SMITH, B., M., ZANDER and R., BROOKE (1973) Legal Problems and the Citizen. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG, CANTON OF, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE (1974) Prognos-Survey of the Ordinary Courts of Baden-Württenberg. Basel, Switzerland: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, E., H., MORASCH and H., WOLFF (1974) “Strukturanalyse der Zivilgerichtsbarkeit,” Parts I and II in Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer, (ed.), Tatsaychen zur Justizreform. Tübingen: C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, E., V., BLANKENBURG and H., MORASCH (1972) “Der lange Weg in die Berufung,” in Bender, R. (ed.), Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen: C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND (1972) “Materialen zum Bericht zur Lage der Nation,” in Bundestagsdrucksache IV/3080. Bonn: Bundesdruckerei.Google Scholar
BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND (1971) Statistisches Jahrbuch. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
DEUTSCHEN DEMOKRATISCHEN REPUBLIK (1971) Statistisches Jahrbuch. Berlin: Staatsverlag.Google Scholar
GOODMAN, L. (1959) “Some Alternatives to Ecological Correlation,” 65 American Journal of Sociology 616.Google Scholar
KAUPEN, W. (1974) “Empirische Bezungspunkte zur Reform der ordenlichten Gerichtsbarkeit,” in BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND, Report to the Ministry of Justice. Köln: Manuscript.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, W. S. (1950) “Ecological Correlation and the Behavior of Individuals,” 15 American Sociological Review 352.Google Scholar