Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:06:35.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Support for the Death Penalty; Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Tom R. Tyler  and
Renee Weber
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this study the instrumental and symbolic perspectives on public support for the death penalty were directly compared within the context of a single survey of citizen attitudes. The results suggest that both instrumental and symbolic concerns influenced death penalty support. When the relative influence of the two factors was directly assessed, the symbolic perspective was found to exercise the major influence upon support for capital punishment, while the influence of instrumental crime-related concerns was small. These results suggest that death penalty support is one aspect of general political-social ideology, rather than a response to crime-related concerns or experiences.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 17 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Psychology and Law , 1982 , pp. 21 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

This study was designed and conducted with the assistance of Robyn Diller, Lisa Hamilton, Joseph Kulba, Mary Polnow, Marcy Roe, Anne Stark, Evelyn Twine, and Bonnie Wolf. The authors would like to thank David Cordray, Shari Diamond, Phoebe Ellsworth, Lawrence Hughes, and Neil Vidmar for providing comments on drafts of this manuscript. Please address correspondence concerning this paper to Tom R. Tyler, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60201.

References

BABBIE, Earl (1973) Survey Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
BLOCK, Richard (1971) “Fear of Crime and Fear of the Police,” 19 Social Problems 91.Google Scholar
COMREY, Andrew and J. A., NEWMEYER (1965) “Measurement of Radicalism-Conservatism,” 67 Journal of Social Psychology 357.Google Scholar
CONKLIN, John (1971) “Dimensions of Community Response to the Crime Problem,” 18 Social Problems 373.Google Scholar
DOWNS, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper-Row.Google Scholar
EASTON, David and Jack, DENNIS (1969) Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
ELLSWORTH, Phoebe (1978) “Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment: From Application to Theory.” Paper presented at the Society for Experimental Social Psychology.Google Scholar
ELLSWORTH, Phoebe and Lee, ROSS (1975) “Empirical Data and Judicial Decision Making.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
ELLSWORTH, Phoebe and Lee, ROSS (1981) Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and Retentionists. Unpublished manuscript, 1981.Google Scholar
JORESKOG, Karl and Marielle VAN, THILLO (1971) “New Rapid Algorithms for Factor Analysis by Unweighted Least Squares, Generalized Least Squares and Maximum Likelihood.” Report No. RM-71-5. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
JORESKOG, Karl and Dag, SORBOM (1978) LISREL IV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Chicago: International Educational Services.Google Scholar
JUROW, George (1971) “New Data on the Effect of a 'Death-Qualified' Jury on the Guilt Determination Processes,” 84 Harvard Law Review 567.Google Scholar
KINDER, Donald and David, SEARS (1981) “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life,” 40 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 414.Google Scholar
KIRSCHT, John and Ronald, DILLEHAY (1967) Dimensions of Authoritarianism: A Review of Research and Theory. Lexington, Kentucky: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
LAU, Richard, Thad, BROWN, and David, SEARS (1978) “Self-interest and Civilians' Attitudes Toward the Vietnam War,” 42 Public Opinion Quarterly 464.Google Scholar
LORD, Charles, Lee, ROSS, and Mark, LEPPER (1979) “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence,” 37 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2098.Google Scholar
MCCONAHAY, John and W. D., HAWLEY (1977) “Is it the Buses or the Blacks.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
RIKER, William and Peter, ORDESHOOK (1973) An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
ROKEACH, Milton and D. Daniel, MCLELLAN (1969) “Dogmatism and the Death Penalty: A Reinterpretation of the Duquesne Poll Data,” 8 Duquesne Law Review 125.Google Scholar
ROKEACH, Milton, and Neil, VIDMAR (1973) “Testimony Concerning Possible Jury Bias in a Black Panther Murder Trial,” 3 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin, and Neil, VIDMAR (1976) “Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Eighth Amendment: Testing the Marshall Hypothesis,” 1976 Wisconsin Law Review 171.Google Scholar
SEARS, David (1975) Political Socialization. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
SEARS, David, Carl, HENSLER, and Leslie, SPEER (1979) “Whites' Opposition to Busing: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?” 73 American Political Science Review 369.Google Scholar
SEARS, David, Richard, LAU, Tom, TYLER, and Harris, ALLEN (1980) “Self-interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting,” 74 American Political Science Review 670.Google Scholar
SEARS, David and Richard, WHITNEY (1973) “Political Persuasion,” in Pool, Ithiel de Sola (ed.), Handbook of Communication. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
SKOGAN, Wesley (1977) “Public Policy and the Fear of Crime in Large American Cities,” in Gardiner, John A. (ed.), Public Law and Public Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
SNORTUM, John and Victor, ASHEAR (1972) “Prejudice, Punitiveness, and Personality,” 36 Journal of Personality Assessment 291.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur, Rebecca, ADAMS, Carol, HEIMER, Kim LANE, SCHEPPELE, Tom, SMITH, and D. Garth, TAYLOR (1980) Crime and Punishment: Changing Attitudes in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, D. Garth, Kim, SCHEPPELE, and Arthur, STINCHCOMBE (1979) “Salience of Crime and Support for Harsher Criminal Sanctions,” 26 Social Problems 413.Google Scholar
THOMAS, Charles (1977) “Eighth Amendment Challenges to the Death Penalty: The Relevance of Informed Public Opinion,” 30 Vanderbilt Law Review 1005.Google Scholar
THOMAS, Charles and Robin, CAGE (1976) “Correlates of Public Attitudes Toward Legal Sanctions,” 4 International Journal of Criminology and Penology 239.Google Scholar
THOMAS, Charles and Samuel, FOSTER (1975) “A Sociological Perspective on Public Support for Capital Punishment,” 45 American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 641.Google Scholar
THOMAS, Charles and Robert, HOWARD (1977) “Public Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment: A Comparative Analysis,” 6 Journal of Behavioral Economics 189.Google Scholar
TROLDAHL, Verling and Roy, CARTER (1964) “Random Selection of Respondents within Households in Phone Surveys,” 1 (2) Journal of Marketing Research 71.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R. (1978) Drawing Inferences from Experiences: The Effect of Crime Victimization Experiences upon Crime-Related Attitudes and Behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA, 1978.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R. (1980) “Impact of Directly and Indirectly Experienced Events: The Origin of Crime-Related Judgments and Behaviors,” 39 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil (1974) “Retributive and Utilitarian Motives and Other Correlates of Canadian Attitudes Toward the Death Penalty,” 15 The Canadian Psychologist 337.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil and Tony, DITTENHOFFER (1981) “Informed Public Opinion and Death Penalty Attitudes,” 23 Canadian Journal of Criminology 43.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil and Phoebe, ELLSWORTH (1974) “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty,” 26 Stanford Law Review 1245.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil and Dale, MILLER (1980) “Socialpsychological Processes Underlying Attitudes Toward Legal Punishment,” 14 Law & Society Review 565.Google Scholar