Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:44:09.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Linares Affair

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

John D. Lantos ,
Steven H. Miles  and
Christine K. Cassel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On August 2, 1988, 6-month-old Samuel Linares aspirated a balloon at a birthday party and was unconscious and blue when his father, Rudolfo, found him. Nine months later, his father used a gun to keep medical staff at bay while he disconnected the respirator keeping his comatose son alive. Mr. Linares ignited much soul-searching among pediatricians, lawyers, and ethicists about treatment decisions for profoundly damaged children.

Public discussion of the ethics of forgoing life support in pediatric care moves like a pendulum betweeen fear of inappropriately allowing children to die and fear of unrestrained life-supporting technology. In the early 1970s, physicians’ and theologians challenged accepted tenets of law and ethics by proposing that pediatricians should allow critically ill or severely disabled babies to die without the most aggressive use of technology. By 1982, Baby Doe caught the nation's moral imagination and raised the possibility that withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining procedures amounted to sanctioned infanticide. This concern led to restrictions on the right of parents and doctors to decide to discontinue treatment. Public sympathy for Mr. Linares suggests that the pendulum may be swinging back toward a less restrictive public policy about forgoing life-sustaining treatment in children.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , Winter 1989 , pp. 308 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This is not the only such case. In 1986, Edward Baker of California was sentenced to 255 days in a work furlough program and three years probation for using a gun to force a nurse to remove life support from his father with cancer. In 1986, a weeping Phoenix man used a shotgun to hold doctors at bay for two hours after he disconnected a respirator from his comatose brother. These cases, where weapons are used to assert family standing vis a vis medical authority in the care of irreversibly ill persons, are quite unlike other instances where persons have used weapons to directly take the life of irreversibly ill family members. (The authors thank Lawrence Nelson and Les Rothenberg for this information.)

References

Lorber, J., “Results of treatment of myelomeningcocele.” Dev Med Child Neuro 13:279–303, 1971; Duff, R.S. Campbell, A.G.M., “Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special care nursery.” N Eng J Med 289:890–94, 1973.Google Scholar
McCormick, R.A., “To save or let die: The dilemma of modern medicine.” JAMA, 1974;229:172–6.Google Scholar
Hentoff, N., “The awful privacy of Baby Doe.” The Atlantic Monthly, January, 1985:54–61.Google Scholar
Stratton, K. Stark, L., “Linares: The untold story.” The Nursing Spectrum, 1989;2:15,20.Google Scholar
American Hospital Association, “The Linares Case.” Hospital Ethics, 1989;5(4):11–4.Google Scholar
Jennett, B. Plum, F., “Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: A syndrome in search of a name.” Lancet 1972;i;734–7.Google Scholar
Skultety, F.M., “Clinical and experimental aspects of akinetic mutism.” Arch Neurol 1968; 19:1–14; Young, R.S.K. Phelan, K.W. Lehman, R.A. et al. , “Computed tomographic findings in akinetic mutism.” Am J Dis Child 1984;1(38):38–166.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, E., “Das Appalisches Syndrome.” Zentrabl Gesante Neurol Psychiatry 1940: 169: 576–9.Google Scholar
Brierley, J.B. Adams, J.H. Graham, D.I. et al. , “Neocortical death after cardiac arrest.” Lancet 1971;2:560–65.Google Scholar
Plum, F. Posner, J.B., The Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma. ed 3. Philadelphia, FA Davis Co, 1980, 7–8, 24–26.Google Scholar
Feinberg, W.M. Ferry, P.C., “A fate worse than death: The persistent vegetative state in childhood.” Am J Dis Child 1984;138: 128–30.Google Scholar
Executive Board, American Academy of Neurology. “Position of the American Academy of Neurology on certain aspects of the care and management of the persistent vegetative state patient.” Neurology, 1989;3(9):9–125.Google Scholar
Mutoh, K. Nakagawa, Y. Hojo, H., “CT appearance of children in a persistent vegetative state.” Brain Dev 1987;9:605–9.Google Scholar
Levy, D.E. Sidtis, J.J. Rottenberg, D.A. et al. , “Differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in vegetative versus locked in patients.” Ann Neurol 1987;2(2):2–673.Google Scholar
Higashi, K. Hatano, M. Abiko, S. et al. , “Five-year follow- up study of patients with persistent vegetative state.” J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;4(4):4–552.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, E., “Recovery to social and economic independence from prolonged post-anoxic vegetative state”. Neurology 1983; 33:372–4.Google Scholar
Gillies, J.D. Seshia, S.S., “Vegetative state following coma in childhood: Evolution and outcome”. Dev Med Child Neuro 1980, 22:642–48.Google Scholar
Coulter, D.L., “Neurologic uncertainty in newborn internsive care”. N Eng J Med, 1987;3(16):16–840.Google Scholar
Campbell, A.G.M., “Children in a persistent vegetative state”. Brit Med J, 1984;289:1022–3. Gillies, et al. , supra note 17.Google Scholar
Margolis, L.H. Shaywitz, B.A., “The outcome of prolonged coma in childhood”. Pediatrics 1980;6(5):5–477.Google Scholar
Mutoh, et al. , supra note 13.Google Scholar
Cambell, A.G.M., “Children in a persistent vegetative state”. Brit Med J, 1984;2(89):89–1022. Feinberg, et al. , supra note 11; Gillies et. al., supra note 17.Google Scholar
Mink, R.B. Pollack, M.M., “A prospective study of the causes of death”. Pediatr Res, 1989;25:41A.Google Scholar
Pless, J.E., “The story of Baby Doe”. N Eng J Med 1983; 309:664Google Scholar
Brown, L.D., “Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: The Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants”. J Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1986; 11(2):231–254.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics v. Heckler 561 F. Supp 395(D.D.C. 1983); American Hosp. Association v. Heckler 585 F. Supp 541 (S.D.N.Y. 1984), aff'd, Nos 84–6211 and 84–6213 (2nd Cir Dec 27, 1984); Otis Bowen vs. American Hospital Association. U.S. Supreme court No 84–1529.Google Scholar
Moskhop, J.C. Saldanha, R.L., “The Baby Doe Rule, Still a Threat”. Hast Cent Rep 1986; 16(2):8–14.Google Scholar
Illinois Abuse and Neglect Child Reporting Act, eff 1/1/87. Secs 2053, and 2057. 3a.Google Scholar
Matter of Quinlan. 355 A. 2nd 647.Google Scholar
In re L.H.R. 321 SE 2d 716 at 723Google Scholar
In re P.V.W. La 424 So 2d 1015 at 1020Google Scholar
In re Guardianship of Andrew James Barry, a minor. 455 So. 2d 365.Google Scholar
Custody of a Minor, Mass, 379 NE 2d 1053. at 1063Google Scholar
Rhoden, N.K., “Treatment Dilemmas for imperiled newborns: Why quality of life counts”. S Cal L Rev. 1985;5(8):8–1283.Google Scholar
Robertson, J.A., “Involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns: A legal analysis”. Stanford L Rev, 1975;2(7):7–213.Google Scholar
Baker, J.G., “Declaratory Judgment in the Infant Doe Case”. Issues in Law & Medicine, 1986;2:77–80.Google Scholar
Weber v Stony Brook Hosp, 467 NYS 2d 685 at 687.Google Scholar
U.S. v. Univ Hosp State U of NY 729 F2d 144 at 146–7; Matter of Hofbauer 419 NY 2nd 936 at 939. 393 NE 2nd 1009; Robertson, J.A., “Dilemma in Danville” Hast Centr Rep 11:5–8 1981; In re Guardianship of Andrew James Barry, a minor. 455 So. 2d 365.Google Scholar
Arras, J.D., “Toward an ethic of ambiguity”. Hastings Cent Rep 1984;15(2):25–33.Google Scholar
Brennan, T.A. “The optimum care committee at Massachusetts General Hospital”. JAMA, 1988.Google Scholar
Duff, R.S. Campbell, A.G.M. “On deciding the care of severely handicapped or dying persons: With particular reference to infants”. Pediatrics, 1976:57:487–91; Gross, R.H. Cox, A. Tatyrek, R. Pollay, M. Barnes, W.A., “Early management and decision making for the treatment of myelomeningocele”. Pediatrics 1983;7(2):2–450.Google Scholar
Michaels, R.H. Oliver, T.K., “Human rights consultation: A 12-year experience of a pediatric bioethics committee”. Pediatrics, 1986; 78:566–72; Kliegman, R. Mahowald, M. Youngner, S., “In our best interests: Experience and workings of an ethics review committee”. J Peds, 1986;108:178–187.Google Scholar
Lantos, J.D. Miles, S.H., “Autonomy in adolescence: A framework for decisions about end of life care”. J Adolesc Med, 1989, In Press.Google Scholar
Holder, A., Legal Issues in Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. Yale University Press 1985.Google Scholar