Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:06:35.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks on the Judge's Role and Moral Certainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Extract

First, I am a trial judge on D.C. Superior Court—a court of general jurisdiction. Thus, my personal experiences and approach are grounded in the intense and heart-rending world of live testimony and real human beings—not the rarefied appellate atmosphere of cold transcripts and brilliant analytical arguments.

To put some of my remarks in context, and to present a totally atypical situation which raises all the analytical issues of Cruzan, I would like to describe a real case—one that I actually tried—about 10 years ago, involving a committed patient at St. Elizabeths Hospital—a large local hospital for the mentally ill. I will call him Vladimir—he was a real person, not a faceless mental patient. Vladimir had escaped from the repressiveness and brutality of pre-Glastnost Russia—to the freedom of the West. Sometime after locating in America and working here, he became mentally ill and was hospitalized.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Miles, S.H. August, A., “Courts, Gender and ‘the Right to Die,’” 85–95 Law, Medicine, & Health Care 18:12, Spring-Summer 1990.Google Scholar
What the courts have really done, in their application of the “clear and convincing” test to different factual scenarios, is to turn it into a “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard. Thus, my real quarrel is not with the application of a “clear and convincing” burden of proof but, rather with the way in which appellate courts have, in practice, turned it into the far more rigorous and demanding test of the criminal law, namely requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt.Google Scholar