Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 June 2013
There is a perception in the legal information profession that levels of information literacy among law students and trainee solicitors are lower than they should be. In this article Ian Hunter considers if this starts at sixth form level and discusses the Google generation stereotype. Training sessions given to sixth-form students by the author are described and the students' levels of information literacy are considered against various information literacy standards. The suitability of these standards for sixth form students is assessed and suggestions for future information literacy training at school, HE and trainee solicitor level are discussed.
1 BIALL Legal Information Literacy Statement http://www.biall.org.uk/pages/biall-legal-information-literacy-statement.html accessed 6 March 2013
2 Winter, Susannah, ‘Law firm libraries in the 21st century’ Legal Information Management, (2008) 8(1), 28Google Scholar
3 Daniel A. Freeman, ‘Jason Vaughan Discusses Web Scale Discovery Systems’ (ALA TechSource, 4 February 2011) http://www.alatechsource.org/blog/2011/02/jason-vaughan-discusses-web-scale-discovery-systems.html accessed 6 March 2013
4 Choolhun, Natasha, ‘Google: to use, or not to use. What is the question?’ Legal Information Management, (2009) 8(9), 168Google Scholar
5 Nicholas, David and others, ‘Google Generation II: web behaviour experiments at the BBC’ Aslib Proceedings, (2011) 63(1), 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Rowlands, Ian and others, ‘The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researchers of the future’ Aslib Proceedings, (2008) 60(4), 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Lasic-Lazic, Jadranka and Spiranec, Sonja, ‘Lost in new learning environments – found in information literacy’ Medijska Istrazivanja (2012) 18(1), 125Google Scholar
8 Miller, C. and Bartlett, J., “Digital fluency”: towards young people's critical use of the internet. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2), 35Google Scholar
9 Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research, Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future (Joint Information Systems Committee, 2008) http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf accessed 6 March 2013
10 Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience. Higher Education in a Web 2.0 World (Joint Information Systems Committee, 2009) http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/generalpublications/2009/heweb2.aspx accessed 6 March 2013
11 BIALL
12 Association of College and Research Libraries, ‘Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education' (2000) http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf accessed 6 March 2013
13 Miller and Bartlett
14 SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy, The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy: Core Model for Higher Education (April 2011) http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf accessed 6 March 2013
15 Paul Gilster, Digital Literacy (John Wiley, 1997)
16 Cmor, Dianne and Li, Xin, ‘Beyond Boolean, Towards Thinking: discovery systems and information literacy’ Library Management (2012) 33(8), 450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 See Freeman for definition
18 Witek, Donna and Grettano, Teresa, ‘Information literacy on Facebook: an analysis’ Reference Services Review (2012) 40(2), 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar