Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:03:10.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Changing Legal Regulation of Cohabitation[:] From Fornicators to Family 1600–2010, by Rebecca Probert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, xii + 282 + (index) 5pp (£70 hardback). ISBN 978-1-107-02084-9.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

John Mee*
Affiliation:
University College Cork

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Changing Legal Regulation of Cohabitation, p 23.

2. Ibid, p 185.

3. Ibid, p 7.

4. Ibid, p 4.

5. [2004] UKHL 30, [93], quoted in The Changing Legal Regulation of Cohabitation, p 8.

6. Ibid, p 277.

7. Ibid.

8. Ibid, p 134.

9. Ibid, p 277 (emphasis in original).

10. Ibid, p 59.

11. Ibid, p 9.

12. Ibid, p 109, quoting V Nicholson Among the Bohemians: Experiments in Living 1900–1939 (London: Penguin, 2003) p 41.

13. The Changing Legal Regulation of Cohabitation, p 63.

14. Ibid, p 40.

15. Ibid, p 108.

16. Ibid, pp 40–43.

17. Ibid, p 42.

18. Ibid, p 13.

19. Ibid, p 198.

20. Ibid, pp 162–163.

21. Ibid, p 2.

22. Ibid, p 278.

23. Ibid, p 279.

24. Ibid, p 161.

25. See eg LA Baker and RE Emery ‘When every relationship is above average[:] perceptions and expectations of divorce at the time of marriage’ (1993) 17 Law & Human Behav 439.

26. See p 273, citing A Barlow, C Burgoyne and J Smithson The Living Together Campaign: An Investigation of its Impact on Legally Aware Cohabitants (London: Research Report to the Ministry of Justice, 2007) p 48.

27. The Changing Regulation of Cohabitation, pp 15, 115, 145.

28. Note the discussion of the international dimension: ibid, pp 281–282.