Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:10:00.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PARTIAL LIABILITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2017

Alex Kaiserman
Alex Kaiserman*
Affiliation:
Balliol College, University of Oxford, alexander.kaiserman@balliol.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In most cases, liability in tort law is all-or-nothing—a defendant is either fully liable or not at all liable for a claimant's loss. By contrast, this paper defends a causal theory of partial liability. I argue that a defendant should be held liable for a claimant's loss only to the degree to which the defendant's wrongdoing contributed to the causing of the loss. I ground this principle in a conception of tort law as a system of corrective justice and use it to critically evaluate different mechanisms for “limiting” liability for consequences of wrongdoing and for “apportioning” liability between multiple wrongdoers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Legal Theory , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacon, F. 1819. Maxims of the Law . In Spedding, J. et al., eds., The Works of Francis Bacon. Vol. 4 (London: J. Johnson).Google Scholar
Barker, K., and Steele, J. 2015. “Drifting towards Proportionate Liability: Ethics and Pragmatics.” Cambridge Law Journal 74 (1):49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, J.H. 1920. “The Proximate Consequences of an Act.” Harvard Law Review 33 (5):633–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, H. 2013. “Legal Responsibility and Scalar Causation.” Jurisprudence 4 (1):102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S. 2017. “Causal Proportions and Moral Responsibility.” In Shoemaker, D. ed., Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Chapman, S. 1948. “Apportionment of Liability between Tortfeasors.” Law Quarterly Review 64 (1):26–45.Google Scholar
Coleman, J.L. 1992. Risks and Wrongs (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Coleman, J.L. 2001. The Practice of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1969. Seeing and Knowing (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Edgarton, H.W. 1924. “Legal Cause.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 72 (3–4):211–244, 343–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R.A. 1973. “A Theory of Strict Liability.” Journal of Legal Studies 2 (1):151– 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton-Glynn, L. 2016. “A Proposed Probabilistic Extension of the Halpern and Pearl Definition of ‘Actual Cause.’” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science axv056. doi:10.1093/bjps/axv056.Google ScholarPubMed
Gardner, J. 2011. “What Is Tort Law For? Part 1. The Place of Corrective Justice.” Law and Philosophy 30 (1):1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. 2014. “What Is Tort Law For? Part 2. The Place of Distributive Justice.” In Oberdiek, J., ed., Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Green, L. 1927. Rationale of Proximate Cause (Kansas City, MO: Vernon Law Book Co.).Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., and Honoré, T. 1985. Causation in the Law. 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, D. 2016. The Law of Intervening Causation (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, H.M., and Moore, M.S. 2002. “Negligence in the Air.” Theoretical Enquiries in Law 3 (2):333–411.Google Scholar
James, F., and Perry, R.F. 1951. “Legal Cause.” Yale Law Journal 60 (5):761–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiserman, A. 2017. “Necessary Connections in Context.” Erkenntnis 82:45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiserman, A. 2016. “Causal Contribution.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 166 (3):387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1980. “A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance.” In Jeffrey, R.C., ed., Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Mackie, J.L. 1965. “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4):245–264.Google Scholar
Malone, W. 1956. “Ruminations on Cause-in-Fact.” Stanford Law Review 9 (1):60–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichols, W.J. 1979. “Judicial Elimination of Joint and Several Liability because of Comparative Negligence: A Puzzling Choice.” Oklahoma Law Review 32 (1): 1–62.Google Scholar
Moore, M.S. 2009. Causation and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M.S. 2013. “Author's Reply.” Jurisprudence 4 (1):121–137.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pearson, R.N. 1979. “Apportionment of Losses under Comparative Fault Laws: An Analysis of the Alternatives.” Louisiana Law Review 40 (2):323–372.Google Scholar
Pollock, F. 1920. The Law of Torts. 11th ed. (London: Stevens and Sons).Google Scholar
Posner, R., and Landes, W.M. 1980. “The Positive Economic Theory of Tort Law.” Georgia Law Review 15 (4):851–924.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. 1998. Equality, Responsibility and the Law (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W.V.H., and van Boom, W.H. 2004. Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors. Vol. 9 (The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).Google Scholar
Sartorio, C. forthcoming. “A New Form of Moral Luck?” In Buckareff, A., Moya, C., and Rosell, S., eds., Agency, Freedom, and Moral Responsibility (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Smith, J. 1911. “Legal Cause in Actions of Tort.” Harvard Law Review 25 (2):103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, J. 2001. “Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences.” Vanderbilt Law Review 54 (3):941–1024.Google Scholar
Steel, S. 2015. Proof of Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, S., and Ibbetson, D. 2011. “More Grief on Uncertain Causation in Tort.” Cambridge Law Journal 70 (2):451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, M. 2007. “Mackie Remixed.” In Campbell, J.K., O'Rourke, M., and Silverstein, H.S., eds., Causation and Explanation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Strudler, A. 1992. “Mass Torts and Moral Principles.” Law and Philosophy 11 (4):297–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, R.S. 1982. Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1977. “The Uniqueness in Causation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (3):177–188.Google Scholar
Weinrib, E.J. 1995. The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wright, R.W. 1985. “Causation in Tort Law.” California Law Review 73 (6):1735–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R.W. 1988. “Allocating Liability among Multiple Responsible Causes: A Principled Defense of Joint and Several Liability for Actual Harm and Risk Exposure.” University of California at Davis Law Review 21 (4):1141–1211.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

PARTIAL LIABILITY—CORRIGENDUM

Alex Kaiserman