Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:05:51.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1937 International Sugar Agreement: Neo-Colonial Cuba and Economic Aspects of the League of Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

MICHAEL FAKHRI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To many in the West, the League of Nations was to establish political peace between nations. To the Cuban sugar-producing elite of the 1920s and 1930s, however, the League was an important socioeconomic institution used to augment many of Cuba's first modern state institutions. This article explores how and why Cuban delegates were the principals behind the 1937 International Sugar Agreement – one of the League's few operational economic treaties. This treaty sheds light onto how actors from the so-called industrial core and agricultural periphery used international law, institutions, and practice to negotiate and renegotiate their relationship with each other.

Keywords

Cubainternational trade lawLeague of Nationsperipherysugar
Type
ARTICLES
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 899 - 922
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Economic and Financial Section, Report and Proceedings of the World Economic Conference, Vol. 1 (1927) (hereafter, 1927 WEC Report and Proceedings), at 149.

2 See, e.g., Preparatory Committee for the International Conference, Report on the First Session of the Committee (held at Geneva from April 26th to May 1st, 1926) (1926), 7–9; J. Gautie, A. Hermes, and H. A. F. Lindsay, Agriculture and the World Crisis (1927); ibid., at 33, 46–8.

3 1927 WEC Report and Proceedings, supra note 1.

4 See R. Prebisch, The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems (1950). Immanuel Wallerstein would later expand upon this idea and add the category of the ‘semi-periphery’.

5 Pedersen, S., ‘Back to the League of Nations’, (2007) 112 American Historical Review 1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 1108–9.

6 One notable exception is Pemberton, J., ‘New Worlds for Old: The League of Nations and the Age of Electricity’, (2002) 28 RIS 311Google Scholar.

7 International Convention for the Abolition of Import and Export Prohibitions and Restrictions, 8 November 1927, 97 LNTS 391; M. Hill, The Economic and Financial Organization of the League of Nations: A Survey of Twenty-Five Years’ Experience (1946), 45–7; W. M. McClure, World Prosperity through the Economic Work of the League of Nations (1933), 366; League of Nations, Commercial Policy in the Interwar Period: International Proposals and National Policies (1942), 33–45, 93 (hereafter, Commercial Policy).

8 G. Baer, International Organizations 1918–1945: A Guide to Research and Research Materials (1981), 159.

9 This longer historical account will be in my forthcoming work.

10 L. H. Jenks, Our Cuban Colony: A Study in Sugar (1928); J. I. Dominguez, Cuba: Order and Revolution (1978).

11 Jenks, supra note 10, at 271 (emphasis added).

12 von Graevenitz, G., ‘Changing Visions of the World Sugar Market in the Great Depression’, (2008) 15 European Review of History 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 738.

13 R. Smith, The United States and Cuba: Business and Diplomacy, 1916–1960 (1960), 49–50, 120.

14 Freeman, H. A., ‘International Administrative Law: A Functional Approach to Peace’, (1948) 57 Yale Law Journal 976CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 979.

15 Hill, supra note 7, at 1–13; McClure, supra note 7, at 410–13.

16 R. Guerra y Sánchez (translated by M. M. Urquidi), Sugar and Society in the Caribbean: An Economic History of Cuban Agriculture (1964 [1927]), 76. Guerra did not take an anti-United States stance but was arguing to improve conditions in Cuba.

17 J. Smuts, The League of Nations: A Practical Suggestion (1918).

18 J. M. Keynes, The Economic Consequences of Peace (1920). See also D. Markwell, John Maynard Keynes and International Relations (2006), 54–89.

19 Wilson, W., ‘Letter to Secretary Redfield’ (29 October 1918), in Baker, R. Standard (ed.), Woodrow Wilson: Life and Letters, Vol. 8 (1939), 587Google Scholar.

20 Smuts, supra note 17, at 24.

21 See, e.g., SirSalter, A., ‘Letter to John Maynard Keynes’ (31 August 1938), in Moggridge, D. (ed.), Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 21 (1980), 474Google Scholar.

22 Hill, supra note 7, at 14–18.

23 J. A. Salter, Allied Shipping Control: An Experiment in International Administration (1921), 252.

24 Hill, supra note 7, at 13.

25 Ibid., at 15–16; McClure, supra note 7, at 66–74.

26 Hill, supra note 7, at 109; McClure, supra note 7, at 66–74.

27 Salter, supra note 23, at 254.

28 See, e.g., Secretariat of the League of Nations, Ten Years of World Cooperation (1930), 178–206; M. Fanshawe and C. A. Macartney, What the League Has Done 1920–1936 (1936), 19–26; C. K. Webster and S. Herbert, The League of Nations in Theory and Practice (1933), 223–38; Salter, A., ‘Contributions of the League of Nations to the Recovery of Europe’, (1927) 134 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 League of Nations, The World Economic Conference: Geneva, May 1927 Final Report, at 51 (hereafter, 1927 WEC Final Report).

30 E. Grossman, Methods of Economic Rapprochement (1926).

31 Ibid., at 26.

32 SirSalter, A., ‘The League's Contribution’, in Boyden, R. W. (ed.), The Economic Consequences of the League: The World Economic Conference (1927), 1, at 5Google Scholar.

33 See, e.g., Colijn, H., ‘The World Economic Conference of 1927’, (1927) 134 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 See, e.g., ‘Comments by Sir John Power’, in Salter, A., ‘The Economic Conference: Prospects and Practical Results’, (1927) 6 Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs 350CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 363.

35 Balfour, A., ‘International Chamber of Commerce’, (1927) 134 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 127. See also J. M. Keynes, ‘Pros and Cons of Tariffs’, The Listener, 30 November 1932, reprinted in Moggridge, supra note 21, at 204.

36 See, e.g., Theunis, infra note 45, at 10; Economic and Financial Section, ‘Extract from the Minutes of Meetings on the Council’, Report and Proceedings of the World Economic Conference, Vol. 1 (1927), 21–7 (C.356.M.129; C.E.I.46).

37 1927 WEC Final Report, supra note 29, at 31.

38 Salter, supra note 34, at 353.

39 A. Hermes, no title, in Boyden, supra note 32, at 73; Webster and Herbert, supra note 28, at 231–2.

40 See, e.g., Economic and Financial Section, ‘Report Submitted to the Commerce Committee by Its Coordination Committee’, Report and Proceedings of the World Economic Conference, Vol. 2 (1927), 118.

41 See, e.g., Information Section, The Monetary and Economic Conference (London, 1933): An Account of the Preparatory Work for the Conference and an Outline of the Previous Activities of the Economic and Financial Organisation of the League of Nations (1933), 66–7.

42 See, e.g., League of Nations, ‘III – Resolutions Proposed by the Commission on International Trade and Adopted Unanimously by the Conference’, in International Financial Conference Brussels 1920, Proceedings of the Conference, Vol. 1 (1920), 22–3; Salter, A., ‘The Economic Causes of War’, in Salter, A. et al. (eds.), The Causes Of War: Economic, Industrial, Racial, Religious, Scientific, and Political (1932), 1Google Scholar, at 14–15; Preparatory Commission of Experts, Monetary and Economic Conference; Draft Annotated Agenda (1933).

43 Runciman, W. L., ‘The World Economic Conference at Geneva’, (1927) 37 Economic Journal 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 468; P. Jacobsson, ‘The Theoretical Solution’, in Boyden, supra note 32, at 49. Cf. Pemberton, supra note 6.

44 1927 WEC Final Report, supra note 29, at 41.

45 Ibid., at 11–12 (M. Theunis, President of the Conference, ‘General Survey and Summary’).

46 See, e.g., Lammers, C., ‘The Cartel Question at the World Economic Conference’ (translated by Scholz, K.), (1927) 134 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Economic and Financial Section, ‘Summary of Minutes, Second Committee (Industry)’, Report and Proceedings of the World Economic Conference, Vol. 2 (1927), 129–47.

48 See, e.g., H. de Peyerimhoff, ‘Rationalisation of Industry’, in Boyden, supra note 32, at 132. See also J. Hirsch, National and International Monopolies from the Point of Labour, the Consuming Public and Rationalisation (1927) (C.E.C.P. 99); W. Oualid, Social Effects of International Industrial Agreements: The Protection of Workers and Consumers (1926) (C.E.C.P. 24) (memoranda released for publication for the Preparatory Committee for the World Economic Conference, 1927).

49 See, e.g., H. S. Pearson, ‘Scientific Management and Cartels’, in Two Memoranda Presented at the World Economic Conference May 1927 (1927) (starts on p. 1); D. Houston, Memo on Rationalization in the United States (1927) (memoranda released for publication for the Preparatory Committee for the World Economic Conference, 1927).

50 H. M. Spitzer, ‘Rationalization and Cartels’, in Two Memoranda Presented at the World Economic Conference May 1927 (1927), 1.

51 D. H. MacGregor, International Cartels (1927); P. de Rousiers, Cartels and Trusts and Their Development (1927); K. Wiedenfeld, Cartels and Combines (1927) (memoranda released for publication for the Preparatory Committee for the World Economic Conference, 1927).

52 MacGregor, supra note 51, at 6.

53 G. Cassel, Recent Monopolistic Tendencies in Industry and Trade: Being an Analysis of the Nature and Causes of the Poverty of Nations (1927) (memorandum released for publication for the Preparatory Committee for the World Economic Conference, 1927).

54 Jenks, supra note 10, at 175–205.

55 1927 WEC Report and Proceedings, supra note 1, at 149. See also Smith, supra note 13, at 49–50, 120.

56 See C. J. Ayala, American Sugar Kingdom: The Plantation Economy of the Spanish Caribbean, 1898–1934 (1999).

57 G. McGillivray, Blazing Cane: Sugar Communities, Class and State Formation in Cuba, 1868–1959 (2009), Chapters 4 and 5.

58 Ayala, supra note 56, at 121–47.

59 See McGillivray, supra note 57, at 126, 145–6, 189.

60 See Smith, supra note 13.

61 Dominguez, supra note 10.

62 L. A. Pérez, Cuba under the Platt Amendment 1902–1934 (1986), 122.

63 Smith, supra note 13, at 42–71.

64 McGillivray, supra note 57, at 1. See also ibid., at 71.

65 McGillivray, supra note 57, at 223.

66 Ibid., at 260.

67 Ayala, supra note 56, at 239–340.

68 Ibid., at 241; McGillivray, supra note 57, at 243; Dominguez, supra note 10, at 85; Pollitt, B., ‘The Cuban Sugar Economy in the 1930s’, in Albert, B. and Graves, A. (eds.), The World Sugar Economy in War and Depression 1914–40 (1988) 97Google Scholar, at 98.

69 Jenks, supra note 10, at 207; J. W. F. Rowe, Studies in the Artificial Control of Raw Material Supplies (1930) (Memorandum No. 23), 5, 42.

70 Rowe, supra note 69, at 4; H. C. Prinsen Geerligs and R. J. Prinsen Geerligs, Cane Sugar Production 1912–1937 (1938), 14.

71 Jenks, supra note 10, at 215.

72 Ibid., at 206–28; Rowe, supra note 69, at 5.

73 B. Albert and A. Graves, ‘Introduction’, in B. Albert and A. Graves, supra note 68, at 6.

74 Rowe, supra note 69, at 5, 42.

75 Jenks, supra note 10, at 229–45.

76 Rowe, supra note 69, at 11–13.

77 Jenks, supra note 10, at 128–40; Dominguez, supra note 10, at 35; B. C. Swerling, International Control of Sugar, 1918–41 (1949), 21; P. G. Wright, Sugar in Relation to the Tariff (1924), 64–5.

78 W. A. Lewis, Economic Survey 1919–1939 (1949), 38–50.

79 Smith, supra note 13, at 113.

80 Ibid., at 121; M. McAvoy, Sugar Baron: Manuel Rionda and the Fortunes of Pre-Castro Cuba (2003), 183; L. E. Aguilar, Cuba 1933: Prologue to Revolution (1972), 45–68.

81 L. A. Pérez, Jr, Cuba and the United State: Ties of Singular Intimacy (2003), 177–8.

82 Ibid., at 178–9.

83 McAvoy, supra note 80, at 165.

84 Pollitt, supra note 68, at 98.

85 Quoted in Jenks, supra note 10, at 390, footnote 4.

86 Rowe, supra note 69, at 15.

87 McAvoy, supra note 80, at 185.

88 Pollitt, supra note 68, at 100. See also B. C. Swerling, ‘Control of an Export Industry: Cuban Sugar’, (1951) 33 Journal of Farm Economics 346, at 348.

89 Dominguez, supra note 10, at 33.

90 1927 WEC Report and Proceedings, supra note 1, at 89, 237–8 (‘Note Submitted by the Cuban Members of the Conference on the Present Position of Sugar from the International Point of View’).

91 Dominguez, supra note 10, at 51.

92 McAvoy, supra note 80, at 223–34; J. A. Guerra y Dében, ‘Recent Evolution of the Sugar Industry’, in Guerra y Sánchez, supra note 16, at 176.

93 Prinsen Geerligs and Prinsen Geerligs, supra note 70, at 28, 40.

94 ‘Welles to Secretary of State’, 13 May 1933, 837.00/351, DS/RG 59, quoted in Pérez, supra note 62, at 305.

95 P. Jessup, ‘Confidential Memorandum on the Cuban Situation’, not dated (ca. early 1933), Philip Jessup papers, quoted in Pérez, supra note 62, at 303. See also Jessup, P., ‘Negotiating Reciprocity Treaties’, (1933) 27 AJIL 738CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Pérez, supra note 62, at 144, 229, 303; McAvoy, supra note 80, at 91, 96–7, 165.

97 Pérez, supra note 62, at 310, 312–14; Aguilar, supra note 80, at 140–1.

98 McAvoy, supra note 80, at 150, 165, 196, 202.

99 Ibid., at 183, 214–15, 225.

100 Pérez, supra note 62, at 154–5; Aguilar, supra note 80, at 110–11, 148–9.

101 Pérez, supra note 62, at 310, 312–14; Aguilar, supra note 80, at 140–1.

102 McAvoy, supra note 80, at 241–8.

103 ‘Cuba: Loot the Place!’, TIME, 21 August 1933, available online at www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,753906-1,00.html.

104 League of Nations, Journal of the Monetary and Economic Conference 112, 28 June 1933, and 116–17, 29 June 1933.

105 Art. I, ‘Annex: Articles as Submitted by the Cuban Delegation’, in League of Nations, Journal of the Monetary and Economic Conference 116–17, 29 June 1933.

106 Art. III, ibid.

107 Art. II, ibid.

108 League of Nations, Journal of the Monetary and Economic Conference 200, 20 July 1933. See also ‘Sugar at the World Economic Conference’, (1933) 25 International Sugar Journal 293.

109 See, e.g., MacAvoy, supra note 80, at 245–58; Smith, supra note 13, at 144–64; Aguilar, supra note 80; Pérez, supra note 81, at 178–201; Mañach, J., ‘Revolution in Cuba’, (1933/34) 12 FA 46Google Scholar.

110 Aguilar, supra note 80, at 149.

111 Dominguez, supra note 10, at 76–80.

112 Ibid., at 54.

113 Ibid., at 67–70; Pollitt, supra note 68, at 104.

114 McAvoy, supra note 80.

115 Smith, supra note 13, at 144–86.

116 Pollitt, supra note 68, at 101; Swerling, supra note 77, at 352–4.

117 Pollitt, supra note 68, McGillivray, supra note 57.

118 For the list of delegates, see International Sugar Conference (1937), 23.

119 McAvoy, supra note 80, at 183, 214–15, 225.

120 Ibid., at 176, 185, 196, 259–60.

121 International Sugar Conference, supra note 118, at 31–3.

122 McAvoy, supra note 80, at 253.

123 Pollitt, supra note 68, at 102–3.

124 International Sugar Conference, supra note 118, at 23.

125 Ibid., at 81–2.

126 Ibid., at 49–57.

127 Arts. 3, 6, 7, 14, 15, 24, 33(f), 34.

128 Arts. 20, 21, 24, 32(c).

129 Art. 33(g).

130 Arts. 28, 46.

131 Art. 44.

132 Art. 37(a).

133 Art. 31.

134 Art. 37(c).

135 Arts. 40–1.

136 Art. 39.

137 Art. 6(a).

138 Arts. 6(a), 9(a).

139 Art. 19.

140 Hagelberg, G. B. and Hannah, A. C., ‘The Quest for Order: A Review of International Sugar Agreements’, (1994) 19 Food Policy 17, at 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

141 Commercial Policy, supra note 7; League of Nations, Towards a Better Economic World (1939).

142 Guide to GATT Law and Practice: Analytical Index (1995), 62, 279, 332–3, 597, 927, 1014, available online at www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/gatt_ai_e.htm.

143 United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (1998), WTO Doc. WT/DS58/R; WT/DS58/R/Corr.1, paras. 3.187–3.189 (Panel Report); United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services (2004), WTO Doc. WT/DS285/R, paras. 3.278, 6.472 (Panel Report).

144 United States – Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline (1996), WTO Doc. WT/DS2/AB/R, para. 65 (Appellate Body Report).

145 See, e.g., Charnovitz, S., ‘The World Trade Organization and Law Enforcement’, (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 817Google Scholar, at 827.