‘Killing Three Birds with One Stone’? The Preliminary Objections Judgments of the International Court of Justice in the Legality of Use of Force Cases
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 June 2005
Abstract
The ICJ in its judgments on the preliminary objections in the Legality of Use of Force cases held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims. Despite the unanimous concurrence in that result, it is clear that there were deep divisions within the Court as to the ground on which that decision should have been reached; only a bare majority subscribed to the reasoning that the Court was required to rule on the question of its jurisdiction ratione personae in relation to Serbia and Montenegro's uncertain status within the United Nations prior to 2000. The minority judges were highly critical of the choice of that basis of decision, in particular given its apparent implications for other cases pending before the Court.
Keywords
- Type
- HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Court of Justice
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2005 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law
Footnotes
- 3
- Cited by