Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:14:09.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The British endemic Enterographa sorediata is the widespread Syncesia myrticola (Roccellaceae, Arthoniales)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2018

Damien ERTZ
Affiliation:
Research Department, Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, B-1860 Meise, Belgium; and Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Direction Générale de l’Enseignement non obligatoire et de la Recherche scientifique, Rue A. Lavallée 1, B-1080 Bruxelles, Belgium. Email: damien.ertz@jardinbotaniquemeise.be
Brian J. COPPINS
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK
Neil A. SANDERSON
Affiliation:
3 Green Close, Woodlands, Southampton, SO40 7HU, UK

Abstract

Enterographa sorediata is a corticolous, crustose lichen endemic to the southern part of Great Britain where it is confined to old-growth woodlands. This lichen is rarely fertile and mainly characterized by a sorediate thallus producing protocetraric acid. However, phylogenetic analyses using nuLSU, RPB2 and nuITS sequences suggest that E. sorediata belongs to the genus Syncesia and is conspecific with S. myrticola. This is corroborated by the chemistry and the recent observation of a thallus with both fully developed S. myrticola-like apothecia and soralia. This provides further evidence of the difficulties involved in correctly placing sorediate sterile morphs of crustose lichens into particular genera without using molecular data. An updated distribution map of S. myrticola for Great Britain and Ireland is provided, showing that the sorediate morph extends more inland whereas the fertile morph is more coastal.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© British Lichen Society, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki, eds): 267281. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.Google Scholar
Coppins, B. J. & James, P. W. (1979) New or interesting British lichens III. Lichenologist 11: 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ertz, D., Tehler, A., Irestedt, M., Frisch, A., Thor, G. & van den Boom, P. (2015) A large-scale phylogenetic revision of Roccellaceae (Arthoniales) reveals eight new genera. Fungal Diversity 70: 3153.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754755.Google Scholar
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 30593066.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Whelen, S. & Hall, B. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among Ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 17991808.Google Scholar
Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. (2015) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.04. Available from: http://mesquiteproject.org.Google Scholar
Miadlikowska, J., McCune, B. & Lutzoni, F. (2002) Pseudocyphellaria perpetua, a new lichen from western North America. Bryologist 105: 110.Google Scholar
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Orange, A., James, P. W. & White, F. J. (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. (2012) FigTree v1.4.2. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. (2007) Tracer v1.6. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, N. A. (2002) Species dossier for Enterographa sorediata, January 2002. Report to English Nature, Norwich.Google Scholar
Sanderson, N. A. (2016) Survey of Candidate Irish RDB Lichen Species, Carrigawaddra, 2015. Report to Lichen Ireland, Belfast.Google Scholar
Sanderson, N. A., James, P. W. & Dobson, F. S. (2009) Enterographa Fée (1824). In The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland (C. W. Smith, A. Aptroot, B. J. Coppins, A. Fletcher, O. L. Gilbert, P. W. James & P. A. Wolseley, eds): 387389. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B. (2004) A monograph of Enterographa and Sclerophyton . Bibliotheca Lichenologica 89: 1141.Google Scholar
Tehler, A. (1997) Syncesia (Arthoniales, Euascomycetidae). Flora Neotropica 74: 148.Google Scholar
Tehler, A. & Irestedt, M. (2007) Parallel evolution of lichen growth forms in the family Roccellaceae (Arthoniales, Ascomycota). Cladistics 23: 432454.Google Scholar
Tehler, A., Irestedt, M., Wedin, M. & Ertz, D. (2010) The Old World Roccella species outside Europe and Macaronesia: taxonomy, evolution and phylogeny. Systematics and Biodiversity 8: 223246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehler, A., Ertz, D. & Irestedt, M. (2013) The genus Dirina (Roccellaceae, Arthoniales) revisited. Lichenologist 45: 427476.Google Scholar
Vilgalys, R. & Hester, M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 42384246.Google Scholar
White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B. & Taylor, J. W. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols. A Guide to Methods and Applications (M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky & T. J. White, eds): 315322. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Woods, R. G. & Coppins, B. J. (2012) A Conservation Evaluation of British Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi. Species Status 13. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar