Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:32:14.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multivariate analysis of anatomical characters confirms the differentiation of two morphologically close species, Melanohalea olivacea (L.) O. Blanco et al. and M. septentrionalis (Lynge) O. Blanco et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2009

Camille TRUONG ,
Yamama NACIRI  and
Philippe CLERC
Camille TRUONG
Affiliation:
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, ch. de l'Impératrice 1, CP 60, CH-1292 Chambésy/Genève, Switzerland. Email: camille.truong@ville-ge.ch
Yamama NACIRI
Affiliation:
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, ch. de l'Impératrice 1, CP 60, CH-1292 Chambésy/Genève, Switzerland. Email: camille.truong@ville-ge.ch
Philippe CLERC
Affiliation:
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, ch. de l'Impératrice 1, CP 60, CH-1292 Chambésy/Genève, Switzerland. Email: camille.truong@ville-ge.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates how anatomical characters can be used to differentiate two morphologically close species, Melanohalea olivacea (L.) O. Blanco et al. and M. septentrionalis (Lynge) O. Blanco et al. Although the two species are morphologically differentiated, mainly based on the position and shape of pseudocyphellae on the lobes, poorly-developed specimens can be difficult to identify based on morphology alone. For example, in Switzerland, both species are at the south-west limit of their distribution range and most specimens are small and not fully developed. In such cases, anatomical characters are particularly useful in separating the two species. Five anatomical characters were studied: spore length and width; hymenium, subhymenium and hypothecium height. A nested ANOVA showed that variation of spore length was 155 times greater between species than between individuals of the same species, itself 5 times higher than within individuals. In a Principal Component Analysis, despite a substantial variation of the anatomical characters within both species, a significant species differentiation appeared distinctly on the first axis (P < 0·001), which accounted for 62·35% of the total variance, and the type specimens nested within each species. Finally, a Discriminant Linear Analysis assigned 100% of the individuals to their species class, the best predictors to discriminate between the two species being subhymenium height and spore length. These characters proved to be powerful in identifying specimens with a poorly-developed morphology and confirmed the presence of M. olivacea in Switzerland.

Keywords

brown ParmelialichensMelaneliafoliosecorticolous
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 41 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 649 - 661
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahti, T. (1966) Parmelia olivacea and the allied non-isidiate and non-sorediate corticolous lichens in the Northern Hemisphere. Acta Botanica Fennica 70: 1–68.Google Scholar
Arup, U. (1994) The genus Caloplaca on seashore rocks in eastern North America. Bryologist 97: 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, O., Crespo, A., Divakar, P., Esslinger, T., Hawksworth, D. & Lumbsch, H. (2004) Melanelixia and Melanohalea, two new genera segregated from Melanelia (Parmeliaceae) based on molecular and morphological data. Mycological Research 108: 873–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco, O., Crespo, A., Ree, R. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2006) Major clades of parmelioid lichens (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) and the evolution of their morphological and chemical diversity. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 52–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodo, I., Duran Sharnoff, S. & Sharnoff, S. (2001) Lichens of North America. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clerc, P. (2004) Les champignons lichénisés de Suisse – Catalogue bibliographique complété par des données sur la distribution et l'écologie des espèces. Cryptogamica Helvetica 19: 1–320.Google Scholar
Culberson, C. & Ammann, K. (1979) Standardmethode zur Dunnschichtchromatographie von Flechtensubstanzen. Herzogia 5: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culberson, C. & Johnson, A. (1982) Substitution of methyl tert-butyl ether for diethyl ether in the standardized thin-layer chromatographic method for lichen products. Journal of Chromatography 238: 483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esslinger, T. (1977) A chemosystematic revision of the brown Parmeliae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 42: 1–211.Google Scholar
Esslinger, T. (1978) A new status for the brown Parmeliae. Mycotaxon 7: 45–54.Google Scholar
Frey, E. (1959) Beiträge zu einer Lichenenflora der Schweiz I. Berichte der Schweizer Botanischen Gesellschaft 69: 156–245.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, U., Hilton-Taylor, C., Mace, G. & Rodríguez, J. (2001) The application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional levels. Conservation Biology 15: 1206–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L., Blanco, O., Divakar, P. K., Ahti, T. & Crespo, A. (2008) A first checklist of parmelioid and similar lichens in Europe and some adjacent territories, adopting revised generic circumscriptions and with indications of species distributions. Lichenologist 40: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera-Campos, M., Nash, T. & Garcia, A. (2001) Preliminary study of the Usnea fragilescens aggregate in Mexico. Bryologist 104: 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holien, H. & Tønsberg, T. (2004) Norsk lavflora. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forl.Google Scholar
IUCN(2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Gland & Cambridge: IUCN Species Survival Commission.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, P. M., James, P. W. & Jarvis, C. E. (1994 a) Linnaean lichen names and their typification. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 115: 261–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, P. M., James, P. W. & Jarvis, C. E. (1994 b) Proposals to reject or conserve 26 Linnaean names of lichenised ascomycetes. Taxon 43: 646–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krog, H., Østhagen, H. & Tønsberg, T. (1994) Lavflora. Norske busk- og bladlav. 2.edition. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T., Kothe, H. & Elix, J. (1988) Resurrection of the lichen genus Pleurosticta Petrak (Parmeliaceae: Ascomycotina). Mycotaxon 33: 447–455.Google Scholar
Lynge, B. (1912) Neue flechten aus Norwegen. Bergens Museum Årbok 1912: 4.Google Scholar
Nylander, W. (1868) Addenda nova ad lichenographiam europaeam. Continuatio 8. Flora (Regensburg) 51: 342—348.Google Scholar
Otte, V., Esslinger, T. L. & Litterski, B. (2005) Global distribution of the European species of the lichen genus Melanelia Essl. Journal of Biogeography 32: 1221—1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelt, J. & Vězda, A. (1981) Bestimmungsschlussel europaischer Flechten. Erganzungsheft II. Bibliotheca Lichenologica. Vaduz: J. Cramer.Google Scholar
Purvis, O., Coppins, B., Hawksworth, D., James, P. & Moore, D. (eds) (1992) The Lichen Flora of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Natural History Museum Publications.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Santesson, R., Moberg, R., Nordin, A., Tønsberg, T. & Vitikainen, O. (2004) Lichen-forming and Lichenicolous Fungi of Fennoscandia. Uppsala: Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Scheidegger, C. & Clerc, P. (2002) Liste rouge des espèces menacées en Suisse: lichens épyphytes et terricoles. Bern, Birmensdorf et Genève: OFEFP, WSL and CJBG.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. & Rohlf, F. (1995) Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Thell, A. (1995) A new position of the Cetraria commixta group in Melanelia (Ascomycotina, Parmeliaceae). Nova Hedwigia 60: 407–422.Google Scholar
Thell, A., Feuerer, T., Kärnefelt, I., Myllys, L. & Stenroos, S. (2004) Monophyletic groups within the Parmeliaceae identified by ITS rDNA, β-tubulin and GAPDH sequences. Mycological Progress 3: 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, V. (1995) Die Flechten Baden-Wuerttembergs. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer, GmbH & Co.Google Scholar
Wirth, V., Schöller, H., Scholz, P., Ernst, G., Feuerer, T., Gnüchtel, A., Hauck, M., Jacobsen, P., John, V. & Litterski, B. (1996) Rote Liste der Flechten (Lichenes) der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 28: 307–368.Google Scholar