Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:26:36.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neosergipea, a new name for the lichen fungus Sergipea, with an updated phylogeny and notes on the genus Dichosporidium (lichenized Ascomycota: Arthoniales: Roccellaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Robert LÜCKING*
Affiliation:
Botanical Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 6–8, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
Martha Cecilia GUTIÉRREZ
Affiliation:
Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Carrera 5 Este No. 15-82, Av. Circumvalar, Bogotá, Colombia
Bibiana MONCADA
Affiliation:
Licenciatura en Biología, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Cra. 4 No. 26D-54, Torre de Laboratorios, Herbario, Bogotá, Colombia; Research Associate, Science & Education, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore, Chicago, IL 60605, USA

Abstract

The new name Neosergipea M. Cáceres, Ertz & Aptroot is introduced to replace Sergipea M. Cáceres, Ertz & Aptroot, which is a later homonym of Sergipea Regali, Uesugui & Santos, a genus of fossil pollen. Using the small subunit of the mitochondrial rDNA cistron, we present an updated phylogeny of the Enterographa clade in Roccellaceae which includes the genera Dichosporidium, Enterographa, Erythrodecton, Mazosia, and Neosergipea. While in a previous analysis the relationship between Neosergipea and Dichosporidium was unresolved, our results suggest Neosergipea to be an unsupported sister to Dichosporidium s. lat. The latter potentially represents two distinct genera, differing in ascospore type.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© British Lichen Society, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aptroot, A., Ertz, D., Lima, E. L., Jesus, K. A., Maia, L. C. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2013) Two new species of Roccellaceae (Ascomycota: Arthoniales) from Brazil, with the description of the new genus Sergipea . Lichenologist 45: 627634.Google Scholar
Arai, M., Lana, C. C. & Ferreira, E. (2013) Taxonomic revision of the dinoflagellate species reported by Regali, Uesugui & Santos. In Abstracts of the 46th Annual Meeting DINO10 of the North American Micropaleontology Section (SEPM), 20–23 October, 2013, San Francisco, California, p. 40.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. & Turner, A. (2013) Taxonomic occurrences of Suidae recorded in the Paleobiology Database. Fossilworks (http://fossilworks.org).Google Scholar
Bettar, I. & Meon, H. (2006) La palynoflore continentale de l’Albien du bassin d’Agadir-Essaouira (Maroc). Revue de Paléobiologie 25: 593631.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. A. (2004) Palynological assemblage from Aptian/Albian of the Sergipe Basin: paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 7: 159168.Google Scholar
Deaf, A. S., Harding, I. C. & Marshall, J. E. A. (2014) Cretaceous (Albian–?early Santonian) palynology and stratigraphy of the Abu Tunis 1x borehole, northern Western Desert, Egypt. Palynology 38: 5177.Google Scholar
Ertz, D. & Tehler, A. (2011) The phylogeny of Arthoniales (Pezizomycotina) inferred from nucLSU and RPB2 sequences. Fungal Diversity 49: 4771.Google Scholar
Ertz, D., Tehler, A., Irestedt, M., Frisch, A., Thor, G. & van den Boom, P. (2015) A large-scale phylogenetic revision of Roccellaceae (Arthoniales) reveals eight new genera. Fungal Diversity 70: 3153.Google Scholar
Fensome, R. A. & Williams, G. L. (2004) The Lentin and Williams Index of Fossil Dinoflagellates. College Park: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists.Google Scholar
Frisch, A., Thor, G., Ertz, D. & Grube, M. (2014) The Arthonialean challenge: restructuring Arthoniaceae . Taxon 63: 727744.Google Scholar
Heimhofer, U. & Hochuli, P.-A. (2010) Early Cretaceous angiosperm pollen from a low-latitude succession (Araripe Basin, NE Brazil). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 161: 105126.Google Scholar
Katoh, K., Asimenos, G. & Toh, H. (2009) Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods in Molecular Biology 537: 3964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lücking, R. (2008) Foliicolous lichenized fungi. Flora Neotropica Monograph 103: 1866.Google Scholar
Maury, C. J. (1925) Fosseis terciarios do Brasil com descripção de novas formas cretaceas. Monographias do Servico Geologico e Mineralogico do Brazil 8: 1305.Google Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Buck, W. R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., et al. (eds & comps.) (2012) International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code), adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Vegetabile 154. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. (2014) FigTree v1.4.2. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree Google Scholar
Regali, M. S. P. (1987) O gênero Sergipea ea sua estratigrafia no Eocretáceo do Brasil. In Anais do X Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia: de 19 a 25 de Julho, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 1987. Vol. 2, pp. 615–623.Google Scholar
Regali, M. S. P. (1989) Evolução da paleoflora no Cretáceo das margens ecuatorial de nordeste do Brasil. Revista Escola de Minas 42: 1733.Google Scholar
Regali, M. S. P., Uesugui, N. & Santos, A. S. (1974) Palinologia dos sedimentos meso-cenozoicos do Brasil (II). Boletim Técnico da Petrobras 17: 263301, plates 1–25.Google Scholar
Santesson, R. (1952) Foliicolous lichens I. A revision of the taxonomy of the obligately foliicolous, lichenized fungi. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 12 (1): 1590.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 13121313.Google Scholar
Thor, G. (1990) The lichen genus Chiodecton and five allied genera. Opera Botanica 103: 192.Google Scholar