Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:09:57.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new species-level taxonomy for Trapelia (Trapeliaceae, Ostropomycetidae) with special reference to Great Britain and the Falkland Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2018

Alan ORANGE
Alan ORANGE*
Affiliation:
Biodiversity and Systematic Biology, National Museum of Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP, Wales. Email: alan.orange@museumwales.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trapelia is a small genus of worldwide distribution. Trapelia coarctata has long been regarded as a morphologically variable species and phylogenetic studies have suggested that it is non-monophyletic, or at least that species are frequently misidentified. The phylogenetic relationships of freshly-collected material of Trapelia were studied using ITS, mitochondrial SSU rDNA and to a small extent also beta-tubulin sequence data, together with chemical and morphological characters. Sequence data combined with morphology and chemistry confirm that the diversity of the genus at species-level has been underestimated. Trapelia coarctata is defined in a more restricted way and many specimens previously referable to this taxon are assigned to the reinstated species T. elacista, which differs in subtle morphological characters including a crack separating the thallus and apothecium in well-developed thalli. Trapelia involuta is reinstated as a separate, though closely related, species to T. glebulosa based on sequence data, morphology and chemistry, and is lectotypified. Trapelia collaris is a distinctive species described as new from Great Britain which has an extensive, cracked thallus with abruptly thickening marginal areoles arising on an inconspicuous prothallus, relatively small apothecia (rarely exceeding 300 µm diameter) and contains 5-O-methylhiascic acid as the major secondary substance. Trapelia obtegens is shown to include frequent non-sorediate morphs which have doubtless been misidentified as other species. The number of species of Trapelia considered to occur in Europe is thus raised from five to eight. The genus is newly reported for the Falkland Islands where seven species occur: T. coarctata, T. placodioides, T. sitiens sp. nov. (with a thin, extensive thallus, sessile apothecia, 5-O-methylhiascic acid as the major secondary substance and the presence of conidiomata), T. tristis sp. nov. (with relatively small apothecia up to 460 µm diameter, presence of gyrophoric acid as the major substance and an absence of conidiomata) and three unidentified species represented by very sparse material. All the species studied, with the possible exception of the three unidentified species, can usually be distinguished by morphological features, particularly the method of development of the thallus and the shape and distribution of the areoles, but morphological variation in response to microhabitat variation is likely to make a proportion of specimens difficult to assign to species in the absence of sequence data.

Keywords

beta-tubulinearly colonizersGermanyITSlichensmine spoilmtSSUstreamstaxonomy
Type
Articles
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 3 - 42
Copyright
© British Lichen Society, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharius, E. (1803) Methodus qua omnes detectos lichenes secundum organa carpomorpha ad genera, species et varietates redigere atque observationibus illustrare tentavit Erik Acharius (Methodus Lichenum). Stockholm: Ulrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aptroot, A. & Schumm, F. (2012) A new terricolous Trapelia and a new Trapeliopsis (Trapeliaceae, Baeomycetales) from Macaronesia. Lichenologist 44: 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodo, I. M. & Lendemer, J. C. (2015) A revision of the saxicolous, esorediate species of Ainoa and Trapelia (Baeomycetaceae and Trapeliaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in North America, with the description of two new species. Bryologist 114: 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusse, F. (1987) A new species of Trapelia (Lichenes) from southern Africa. Bothalia 17 : 187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusse, F. (1991) Two new species in the Agyriaceae (lichenized Ascomycotina, Lecanorales) from southern Africa. Bothalia 21 : 154–156.Google Scholar
Choisy, M. (1929) Genres nouveaux pour la lichénologie dans le groupe des Lécanoracées. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 76: 521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppins, B. J. & James, P. W. (1984) New or interesting British lichens. Lichenologist 16: 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertz, D., Aptroot, A., Van de Vijver, B., Sliwa, L., Moermans, C. & Øvstedal, D. (2014) Lichens from the Utsteinen Nunatak (Sør Rondane Mountains, Antarctica), with the description of one new species and the establishment of permanent plots. Phytotaxa 191: 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, T. M. (1867) Nya skandinaviska laf-arter No. 71–90, 91–100. Botaniska Notiser 1867: 105–110, 151–155.Google Scholar
Fryday, A. M. (2004) New species and records of lichenized fungi from Campbell Island and the Auckland Islands, New Zealand. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 88: 127–146.Google Scholar
Fryday, A. M. (2015) A new checklist of lichenised, lichenicolous and allied fungi reported from South Africa. Bothalia 45 (1): 59–122.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. J. (2007) Flora of New Zealand Lichens. Revised Second Edition Including Lichen-Forming and Lichenicolous Fungi. Volumes 1 and 2. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
Gargas, A., DePriest, P. T. & Taylor, J. W. (1995) Positions of multiple insertions in SSU rDNA of lichen-forming fungi. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 208–218.Google ScholarPubMed
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J. F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W. & Gascuel, O. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutell, R. R. (1993) Collection of small subunit (16S- and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Research 21: 3051–3054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafellner, J. (1984) Studien in Richtung einer natürlichen Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae . Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 241–371.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L., James, P. W. & Coppins, B. J. (1980) Checklist of British lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi. Lichenologist 12: 1–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, H. (1969) Die Flechtengattung Trapelia Choisy. Herzogia 1: 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, H. (1970) Trapeliaceae - eine neue Flechtenfamilie. Vorträge aus dem Gesamtgebiet der Botanik, N. F. [Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft] 4: 171–185.Google Scholar
James, P. W. (1965) A new checklist of British lichens. Lichenologist 3: 95–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantvilas, G. & Elix, J. A. (2007) Additions to the lichen family Agyriaceae Corda from Tasmania. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 95: 317–333.Google Scholar
Kantvilas, G., Leavitt, S. D., Elix, J. A. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2014) Additions to the genus Trapelia (Trapeliaceae: lichenised Ascomycetes). Australian Systematic Botany 27: 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondratyuk, S. Y., Lőkös, L., Halda, J. P., Haji Moniri, M., Farkas, E., Park, J. S., Lee, B. G., Oh, S.-O. & Hur, J.-S. (2016) New and noteworthy lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi 4. Acta Botanica Hungarica 58 : 75–136.Google Scholar
Krempelhuber, A. von (1876) Lichenes brasilienses collecti a D. A. Glaziou in provincia brasiliensi Rio Janeiro. Flora (Regensburg) 59: 378–384 [part].Google Scholar
Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S. Y. & Guindon, S. (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1695–1701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanfear, R., Frandsen, P. B., Wright, A. M., Senfeld, T. & Calcott, B. (2017) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 772–773.Google ScholarPubMed
Laundon, J. R. (2005) The publication and typification of Sir James Edward Smith’s lichens in English Botany. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147: 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, W. A. (1879) The Lichen-Flora of Great Britain, Ireland and the Channel Islands. 3rd edn. Shrewsbury: printed for the author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T. (1997) Systematic studies in the suborder Agyriineae (Lecanorales). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 83: 1–73.Google Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T., Schmitt, I., Mangold, A. & Wedin, M. (2007) Ascus types are phylogenetically misleading in Trapeliaceae and Agyriaceae (Ostropomycetidae, Ascomycota). Mycological Research 111: 1133–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackay, J. T. (1836) Flora Hibernica, Comprising the Flowering Plants, Ferns, Characeae, Musci, Hepaticae, Lichenes and Algae of Ireland. Dublin: William Curry.Google Scholar
McCarthy, P. M. (2016) Checklist of the Lichens of Australia and its Island Territories. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. Version 22 January 2016. http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/lichenlist/introduction.html.Google Scholar
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orange, A. (2009) Saxicolous lichen and bryophyte communities in upland Britain. JNCC Report 404. ISSN 0963 8091.Google Scholar
Orange, A. (2012) Semi-cryptic marine species of Hydropunctaria (Verrucariaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) from north-west Europe. Lichenologist 44: 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orange, A. (2014) Porpidia irrigua, a new species related to P. contraponenda . Lichenologist 46: 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orange, A., James, P. W. & White, F. J. (2010) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Purvis, O. W., Coppins, B. J., Hawksworth, D. L., James, P. W. & Moore, D. M. (eds) (1992) The Lichen Flora of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Natural History Museum Publications & British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Purvis, O. W., Coppins, B. J., Wolseley, P. A. & Fletcher, A. (2009) Trapelia M. Choisy (1929). In The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland (C. W. Smith, A. Aptroot, B. J. Coppins, A. Fletcher, O. L. Gilbert, P. W. James & P. A. Wolseley, eds): 904–908. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Resl, P., Schneider, K., Westberg, M., Printzen, C., Palice, Z., Thor, G., Mayrhofer, H. & Spribille, T. (2015) Diagnostics for a troubled backbone: testing topological hypotheses of trapelioid lichenized fungi in a large-scale phylogeny of Ostropomycetidae (Lecanoromycetes). Fungal Diversity 73: 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, C., Monnat, J.-Y., Gonnet, D., Gonnet, O., Poumarat, S., Esnault, J., Bertrand, M., Gardiennet, A., Masson, D., Bauvet, C. et al. (2017) Liste des lichens et champignons lichénicoles de France métropolitaine (mise à jour 2017/03/05). Available at: http://lichenologue.org/fr/.Google Scholar
Schmitt, I., Mueller, G. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2005) Ascoma morphology is homoplaseous and phylogenetically misleading in some pyrenocarpous lichens. Mycologia 97: 362–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, G. (1979) Die Flechtengattung Psora sensu Zahlbruckner. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 13: 1–291.Google Scholar
Schneider, K., Resl, P. & Spribille, T. (2016) Escape from the cryptic species trap: lichen evolution on both sides of a cyanobacterial acquisition event. Molecular Ecology 25: 3453–3468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. L. (1921) A Handbook of the British Lichens. London: British Museum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. W., Aptroot, A., Coppins, B. J., Fletcher, A., Gilbert, O. L., James, P. W. & Wolseley, P. A. (eds) (2009) The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Smith, J. E. (1798) English Botany 8: plate 534.Google Scholar
Smith, J. E. (1808) English Botany 28: plate 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatakis, A. (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596–1599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiltshear, F. G. (1915) Bibliographical notes. LVIII. Smith’s ‘Flora Britannica’. Journal of Botany 53: 34–36.Google Scholar
Wirth, V. (1972) Die Silikatflechten-Gemeinschaften im außeralpinen Zentraleuropa. Dissertationes Botanicae 17: 1–285.Google Scholar
Wirth, V., Hauck, M. & Schultz, M. (2013) Die Flechten Deutschlands. Band 2. Stuttgart: Ulmer.Google Scholar
Zahlbruckner, A. (1928) Catalogus Lichenum Universalis. Vol. 5, Band 3. Berlin: Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Zahlbruckner, A. (1930) New species of lichens from Porto Rico. Mycologia 22: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar