Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:56:24.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partitioning the role of climate, pollution and old-growth woodland in the composition and richness of lichen epiphytes in Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2010

Christopher J. ELLIS  and
Brian J. COPPINS
Christopher J. ELLIS
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, U.K. Email: c.ellis@rbge.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a study to partition the role of three regional-scale drivers – woodland extent and continuity, pollution regime, and climatic setting – in explaining the composition and richness of lichen epiphytes in Scotland. To do this we used partial canonical correspondence analysis and multiple least squares regression, to examine lichen communities across 170 study sites. First, our results demonstrate the importance of climate in explaining species composition. This highlights the relatively clean-air environment of Scotland within a European setting, and emphasizes the important consideration of regional context in the development of bioclimatic species-response models. This result contrasts with a previous similar study which collapsed complex environmental data into summary gradients, and which therefore discounted climate as a key factor. Second, we show a functional decoupling between composition and species richness, which was optimally explained by old-growth woodland extent and pollution, and only weakly explained by climate. The difference in explanatory variables between composition and richness is a focal issue in determining the processes by which species compositional change, driven by rapid and deep climate change, may indirectly impact species richness. For example, this impact may occur through an imbalance in rates of species extinction (for sensitive range-edge species) and establishment in a fragmented landscape (for dispersal-limited colonists), though operating against the ‘stabilizing effect’ of microclimatic setting.

Keywords

bioclimatic modellingclimate changeconservation strategyspecies compositionspecies richness
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , September 2010 , pp. 601 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berglund, H. & Jonsson, B. G. (2001) Predictability of plant and fungal species richness of old-growth boreal forest islands. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 857–866.Google Scholar
Borcard, D., Legendre, P. & Drapeau, P. (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppins, A. M. & Coppins, B. J. (2002) Indices of Ecological Continuity for Woodland Epiphytic Lichen Habitats in the British Isles. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Coppins, B. J., Hawksworth, D. L. & Rose, F. (2001) Lichens. In The Changing Wildlife of Great Britain and Ireland (Hawksworth, D. L., ed.): 126–147. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Currie, D. J. (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal-species and plant-species richness. American Naturalist 137: 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, C. J. & Coppins, B. J. (2006) Contrasting functional traits maintain lichen epiphyte diversity in response to climate and autogenic succession. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1643–1656.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. J. & Coppins, B. J. (2007) Changing climate and historic-woodland structure interact to control species diversity of the ‘Lobarion’ epiphyte community in Scotland. Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 725–734.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. J. & Coppins, B. J. (2009) Quantifying the role of multiple landscape-scale drivers controlling epiphyte composition and richness in a conservation priority habitat (juniper scrub). Biological Conservation 142: 1291–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, C. J. & Coppins, B. J. (2010) Integrating multiple landscape-scale drivers in the lichen epiphyte response: climatic setting, pollution regime and woodland spatial-temporal structure. Diversity and Distributions 16: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, C. J., Coppins, B. J., Dawson, T. P. & Seaward, M. R. D. (2007) Response of British lichens to climate change scenarios: trends and uncertainties in the projected impact for contrasting biogeographicgroups. Biological Conservation 140: 217–235.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. J., Yahr, R. & Coppins, B. J. (2009) Local extent of old-growth woodland modifies epiphyte response to climate change. Journal of Biogeography 36: 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, A. (2006) Contributions towards a new systematics of the lichen family Thelotremataceae I. The lichen family Thelotremataceae in Africa. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 92: 3–370.Google Scholar
Fryday, A. M. (2006) Lichens. In The Changing Nature of the Cairngorms (Shaw, P. & Thompson, D. B. A., eds): 177–193. Edinburgh: SNH.Google Scholar
Geiser, L. H. & Neitlich, P. N. (2007) Air pollution and climate gradients in western Oregon and Washington indicated by epiphytic macrolichens. Environmental Pollution 145: 203–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gignac, L. D. & Dale, M. R. T. (2005) Effects of habitat fragmentation and habitat heterogeneity on cryptogam diversity in low-boreal forest of western Canada. Bryologist 108: 50–66.Google Scholar
Giordani, P. & Incerti, G. (2008) The influence of climate on the distribution of lichens: a case study in a borderline area (Liguria, NW Italy). Plant Ecology 195: 257–272.Google Scholar
Green, T. G. A. & Lange, O. L. (1991) Ecophysiological adaptations of the lichen genera Pseudocyphellaria and Sticta to south temperate rainforests. Lichenologist 23: 267–282.Google Scholar
Hawkins, B. A., Field, R., Cornell, H. V., Currie, D. J, Guégan, J.-F., Kaufman, D. M., Kerr, J. T., Mittelbach, G. G., Oberdorff, T., O'Brien, E. M., et al. (2003) Energy, water and broadscale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84: 3105–3117.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. & Rose, F. (1970) Qualitative scale for estimating sulphur dioxide air pollution in England and Wales using epiphytic lichens. Nature 227: 145–148.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G. L., Perry, M. C. & Prior, M. J. O. (2007) The Climate of the United Kingdom and Recent Trends. Exeter: Meteorological Office.Google Scholar
Jovan, S. & McCune, B. (2005) Air-quality bioindication in the Greater Central Valley of California, with epiphytic macrolichen communities. Ecological Applications 15: 1712–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppel, G., Buckley, Y. M. & Possingham, H. P. (2010) Drivers of lowland rain forest community assembly, species diversity and forest structure on islands in the tropical south Pacific. Journal of Ecology 98: 87–95.Google Scholar
Lange, O. L., Kilian, E. & Ziegler, H. (1986) Water vapour uptake and photosynthesis of lichens: performance differences in species with green and blue-green algae as phycobionts. Oecologia 71: 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, O. L., Büdel, B., Meyer, A. & Kilian, E. (1993) Further evidence that activation of net photosynthesis by dry cyanobacterial lichens requires liquid water. Lichenologist 25: 175–189.Google Scholar
Lepš, J. & Šmilauer, P. (2003) Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidén, M. & Hilmo, O. (2005) Population characteristics of the suboceanic lichen Platismatia norvegica in core and fringe habitats: relations to macroclimate, substrate, and proximity to streams. Bryologist 108: 506–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löbel, S., Snäll, T. & Rydin, H. (2006) Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes – evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo-nemoral forests. Ecography 29: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwhoff, S. H. J. J. (2001) Biogeography of Hypotrachyna, Parmotrema and allied genera (Parmeliaceae) in the Pacific islands. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 78: 223–246.Google Scholar
McCune, B. & Grace, J. B. (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. Oregon: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. (1999) PC-Ord, Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4. Oregon: MjM Software.Google Scholar
Moning, C., Werth, S., Dziock, F., Bässler, C., Bradtka, J., Hothorn, T. & Müller, J. (2009) Lichen diversity in temperate montane forests is influenced by forest structure more than climate. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 745–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEGTAP (2001) Transboundary Air Pollution: Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone in the UK. Edinburgh: National Expert Group on Transboundary Air Pollution.Google Scholar
Økland, R. H. (1999) On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres-Neto, P. R., Legendre, P., Dray, S. & Borcard, D. (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2614–2625.Google Scholar
Perry, M. C. & Hollis, D. M. (2005) The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climate variables over the UK. Journal of Climatology 25: 1041–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A. J., Russell, C., Walker, G. J. & Kirby, K. J. (1992) Regional variation in the origin, extent and composition of Scottish woodland. Botanical Journal of Scotland 46: 167–189.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rose, F. (1974) The epiphytes of oak. In The British Oak: Its History and Natural History (Morris, M. G. & Perring, F. H., eds): 250–273. Faringdon: Classey.Google Scholar
Rounsevell, M. D. A., Reginster, I., Araújo, M. B., Carter, T. R., Dendoncker, N. Ewert, F., House, J. I., Kankaanpää, S., Leemans, R., Metzger, M. J., et al. (2006) A coherent set of future land-use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaward, M. R. D. (1998) Time-space analysis of the British lichen flora, with particular reference to air quality surveys. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 32: 85–96.Google Scholar
Selva, S. B. (1994) Lichen diversity and stand continuity in the northern hardwoods and spruce-fir forests in northern New England and western New Brunswick. Bryologist 97: 424–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillett, S. C., McCune, B., Peck, J. E., Rambo, T. R. & Ruchty, A. (2000) Dispersal limitations of epiphytic lichens result in species dependent on old-growth forests. Ecological Applications 10: 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, B. & Kalb, K. (2004) Graphis. Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region, Volume 2 (Nash, T. H. III, Ryan, B. D., Diederich, P., Gries, C. & Burgartz, F., eds): 118–122. Tempe, Arizona: Lichens Unlimited, Arizona, State University.Google Scholar
Ter Braak, C. J. F. & Šmilauer, P. (2002) CANOCO v. 4.5, Software for Community Ordination. New York: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1992) Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal coniferous forests. Nordic Journal of Botany 12: 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, J. M. J. (2003) Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 270B: 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dobben, H. F., Wolterbeek, H. T., Wamelink, G. W. W. & Ter Braak, C. J. F. (2001) Relationship between epiphytic lichens, trace elements and gaseous atmospheric pollutants. Environmental Pollution 112: 163–169.Google Scholar
Van Herk, C. M. (1999) Mapping of ammonia pollution with epiphytic lichens in the Netherlands. Lichenologist 31: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Verburg, P., Rounsevell, M. D. A. & Veldkamp, A. (2006) Scenario based studies of future land-use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G. J. & Kirby, K. J. (1989) Inventories of ancient, long-established and semi-natural woodland for Scotland. Research and Survey in Nature Conservation No. 22. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Werth, S., Tømmervik, H. & Elvebakk, A. (2005) Epiphytic macrolichen communities along regional gradients in northern Norway. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 199–208.Google Scholar
Wolseley, P. A., James, P. W., Theobald, M. R. & Sutton, M. A. (2006) Detecting changes in atmospheric lichen communities at sites affected by atmospheric ammonia from agricultural sources. Lichenologist 38: 161–176.Google Scholar
Woodin, S. J. (1989) Environmental effects of air pollution in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 749–761.Google Scholar