Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:42:38.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Richness of epiphytic lichens in differently aged Picea abies plantations situated in the oceanic region of Central Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Olga HILMO
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Email: olga.hilmo@bio.ntnu.no
Håkon HOLIEN
Affiliation:
Nord-Trøndelag University College, Faculty of Agriculture and Information Technology, Servicebox 2501, 7729 Steinkjer, Norway.
Håkan HYTTEBORN
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Email: olga.hilmo@bio.ntnu.no
Hilde ELY-AALSTRUP
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Email: olga.hilmo@bio.ntnu.no

Abstract

This study aims to investigate patterns of species richness and abundance in relation to stand age in 71 Picea abies plantations, aged between 9 and 85 years, situated in the oceanic region of Central Norway. The study has shown that plantations within the oceanic spruce forests can support a relatively high number of epiphytic lichen species. Some of the oldest plantations hosted several old-forest associated species, e.g. Hypogymnia vittata, Lobaria pulmonaria, Pseudocyphellaria crocata and Ramalina thrausta. The number of species was influenced significantly by stand age and increased rapidly in stands <20 years old. Stands >30 years old showed no clear increase in species number, except for a high number of species in the two oldest stands. The colonization pattern could be characterized as an additional entrance of species, rather than by a replacement sequence. The probability of occurrence increased steeply at young stand ages (<20 years) for Bryoria spp., Cavernularia hultenii, Platismatia glauca, Parmelia sulcata and Usnea spp. A lower rate of colonization was characteristic for Alectoria sarmentosa, Parmelia saxatilis and Platismatia norvegica. The cover of foliose lichens on the branches showed an almost unimodal response to stand age. The cover of lichens was highest on branches in middle-aged plantations. The reason for the lower lichen cover in late successional stages, compared to middle-aged stands, could be due to reduced light in the lower canopy of mature plantations. Increased rotation cycle, creation of gaps and short distance to sources of propagules are factors suggested to promote species richness and abundance in forest plantations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aastrup, H. E (2007) Colonization of old-growth associated lichens in spruce plantations in boreal rainforest, Central Norway. Masters thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Barkman, J. J. (1958) Phytosociology and Ecology of Cryptogamic Epiphytes. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. & McCune, B. (2006) Estimating epiphytic macrolichen biomass from topography, stand structure and lichen community data. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 150170.Google Scholar
Coote, L., Smith, G. F., Kelly, D. L., O'Donoghue, S., Dowding, P., Iremonger, S. & Mitchell, F. J. G. (2007) Epiphytes of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) plantations in Ireland and the effects of open spaces. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 40094024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M. J. (2002) Statistical Computing. An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Dettki, H. & Esseen, P.-A. (1998) Epiphytic macrolichens in managed and natural forest landscapes: a comparison at two spatial scales. Ecography 21: 613624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dettki, H. & Esseen, P.-A (2003) Modelling long-term effects of forest management on epiphytic lichens in northern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 175: 223238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esseen, P.-A., Renhorn, K. E. & Petersson, R. B. (1996) Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests: effect of branch quality. Ecological Applications 6: 228238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Førland, E. J. (1993) Precipitation normals, normal period 1961–1990 [In Norwegian]. Norwegian Institute of Meteorology, Report 39/93. Climate 163.Google Scholar
Gaarder, G., Håpnes, A., Tønsberg, T. & Holien, H. (1997) Boreal rain forest in Central Norway. Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway [In Norwegian with English summary]. DN-report 1997: 2.Google Scholar
Gauslaa, Y. & Holien, H. (1998) Acidity of boreal Picea abies – canopy lichens and their substratum, modified by local soils and airborne acidic depositions. Flora 193: 249257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauslaa, Y., Lie, M., Solhaug, K. A. & Ohlson, M. (2006) Growth and ecophysiological acclimation of the foliose lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in forests with contrasting light climates. Oecologia 147: 406416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauslaa, Y., Palmqvist, K., Solhaug, K. A., Holien, H., Hilmo, O., Nybakken, L., Myhre, L. C. & Ohlson, M. (2007) Growth of epiphytic old forest lichens at regional and successional scales. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 18321845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, W.-D., Kuusinen, M., Konttinen, T. & Hanski, I. (2001) Spatial pattern in the occurrence of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in managed and virgin boreal forests. Ecography 24: 139150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. (1999) Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilmo, O. (2002) Growth and morphological response of old-forest lichens transplanted into young and an old Picea abies forest. Ecography 25: 329335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilmo, O. (1994) Distribution and succession of epiphytic lichens on Picea abies branches in a boreal forest, central Norway. Lichenologist 26: 149169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilmo, O. & Ott, S. (2002) Juvenile development of the cyanolichen Lobaria scrobiculata and the green-algal lichens Platismatia glauca and Platismatia norvegica in a boreal Picea abies forest. Plant Biology 4: 273280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilmo, O. & Såstad, S. (2001) Colonization of old-forest lichens in a young and an old boreal Picea abies forest: an experimental approach. Biological Conservation 102: 251259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holien, H. (1997) The lichen flora on Picea abies in a suboceanic spruce forest area in Central Norway with emphasis on the relationship to site and stand parameters. Nordic Journal of Botany 17: 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holien, H. (1998) Lichens in spruce stands of different successional stages in central Norway with emphasis on diversity and old growth species. Nova Hedwigia 66: 283324.Google Scholar
Holien, H. & Tønsberg, T. (1996) Boreal regaskog i Norge – liabitatet for trendelags-elementets lavarter. Blyttia 54: 157177.Google Scholar
Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. F. & van Tongeren, O. F. R. (1995) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusinen, M. & Siitonen, J. (1998) Epiphytic lichen diversity in old-growth and managed Picea abies stands in southern Finland. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 283292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kålås, J. A, Viken, Å. & Bakken, T. (2006) Norsk Rødliste 2006 – 2006 Norwegian Red List. Artdatabanken, Norway.Google Scholar
Moen, A. (1999) National Atlas of Norway: Vegetation. Hønefoss, Norway: Norwegian Mapping Authority.Google Scholar
McCune, B. 1993 Gradients in epiphyte biomass in 3 Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forests of different ages in western Oregon and Washington. Bryologist 96: 405411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ockinger, E., Niklasson, M. & Nilsson, S. G. (2005) Is local distribution of the epiphytic lichen Lobaria pulmonaria limited by dispersal capacity or habitat quality? Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 759773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J. E. & McCune, B. (1997) Remnant trees and canopy lichen communities in western Oregon: a retrospective approach. Ecological Applications 7: 11811187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, E. B. & McCune, B. (2001) Diversity and succession of epiphytic macrolichen communities in low-elevation managed conifer forests in Western Oregon. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 511524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestø, T. & Holien, H. (2001) Fouvaltning av lav og moser i boreal regnskog. NTNU Vitenskaps museet. Rapport botaniṡk serie 2001 (5): 177.Google Scholar
Rolstad, J., Gjerde, I., Storaunet, K. O. & Rolstad, E. (2001) Epiphytic lichens in Norwegian coastal spruce forest: historical logging and present forest structure. Ecological Applications 11: 421436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santesson, R., Moberg, R., Nordin, A., Tønsberg, T. & Vitikainen, O. (2004) Lichenforming and lichenicolous fungi of Fennoscandia. Uppsala: Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Scheidegger, C. (1995) Early development of transplanted isidioid soredia of Lobaria pulmonaria in an endangered population. Lichenologist 27: 361374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillett, S. C., McCune, B., Peck, J. E., Rambo, T. R. & Ruchty, A. (2000) Dispersal limitations of epiphytic lichens result in species dependent on old-growth forests Ecological Application 10: 789799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snäll, T., Ribeiro, P. J. & Rydin, H. (2003) Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch-tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal. Oikos 103: 566578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walser, J.-C. (2004) Molecular evidence for limited dispersal of vegetative propagules in the epiphytic lichen Lobaria pulmonaria. American Journal of Botany 91: 12731276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed