Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:05:10.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A taxonomic revision of Caloplaca herbidella and C. furfuracea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Ulf ARUP  and
Elin ÅKELIUS
Ulf ARUP
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Lund University, Östra Vallgatan 18, SE-223 61 Lund, Sweden.
Elin ÅKELIUS
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Lund University, Östra Vallgatan 18, SE-223 61 Lund, Sweden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Caloplaca herbidella (Hue) H. Magn. and C. furfuracea H. Magn. are two isidiate, epiphytic species in the large genus Caloplaca. Caloplaca herbidella in a strict sense is normally grey and fertile with thick, somewhat coralloid isidia, but orange, sterile forms with thin isidia also occur. Caloplaca furfuracea is superficially similar morphologically to C. herbidella s. str. but has thinner, more granular isidia and generally a darker grey colour. Doubts have been raised as to whether C. furfuracea should be acknowledged as a proper species or incorporated in C. herbidella. Using morphometric methods and molecular analysis of the nrITS DNA gene we show that C. herbidella and C. furfuracea are two clearly separated species. Furthermore, the mainly sterile, orange form of C. herbidella can be regarded as a separate species that is here described as C. coralliza Arup & Åkelius. All three species are described in detail, including photographs and notes on their ecology. Finally, new distribution maps for Europe show that C. herbidella and C. coralliza are widespread in Europe, but the latter is probably less common than the former. Caloplaca furfuracea is clearly very rare in Europe with only few collections from Switzerland and Sweden, but seems to be more common in North America.

Keywords

Caloplaca corallizaDNAEuropeisidiateITSlichenmolecular
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , September 2009 , pp. 465 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. A. (1974) Additions to the lichen flora of North America III. Bryologist 77 : 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arup, U. (2006) A new taxonomy of the Caloplaca citrina group in the Nordic countries, except Iceland. Lichenologist 38: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arup, U., Ekman, S., Lindblom, L. and Mattson, J.-E. (1993) High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC), an improved technique for screening lichen substances. Lichenologist 25: 61–71.Google Scholar
Clauzade, G. & Roux, C. (1985) Likenoj de Okcidenta Eǔropo. Ilustrita determinlibro. Bulletin de la Société Botanique du Centre-Ouest, nouvelle série, numero spécial 7: 1–893.Google Scholar
Egan, R. S. (1987) A fifth checklist of the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. Bryologist 90: 77–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esslinger, T. L. (2008) A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. North Dakota State University: http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/esslinge/chcklst/chcklst7.htm (First posted 1 December 1997, Most Recent Version (#14) 8 October 2008), Fargo, North Dakota.Google Scholar
Esslinger, T. L. & Egan, R. S. (1995) A sixth checklist of the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. Bryologist 98: 467–549.Google Scholar
Foucard, T. (2001) Svenska skorplavar och svampar som växer på dem. Stockholm: Interpublishing.Google Scholar
Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes. Application for the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glen, G., Dunn, W. J. III & Scott, D. R. (1989) Principal components analysis and partial least square regression. Tetrahedron Computer Methodology 2: 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, U. (ed.) (2005) The 2005 Red List of Swedish species. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken, SLU.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 9pp. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htmGoogle Scholar
Kärnefelt, I. (1990) Isidiate taxa in the Teloschistales and their ecological and evolutionary significance. Lichenologist 22: 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimis, P. L. (1993) The Lichens of Italy – An Annotated Catalogue. Torino: Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali.Google Scholar
Santesson, R., Moberg, R., Nordin, A., Tønsberg, T. & Vitikainen, O. (2004) Lichen-forming and Lichenicolous Fungi of Fennoscandia. Uppsala: Museum of Evolution.Google Scholar
Søchting, U. (2001) Chemosyndromes with chlorinated anthraquinones in the lichen genus Caloplaca. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 78: 395–404.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Tønsberg, T. (1992) The sorediate and isidiate, corticolous, crustose lichens in Norway. Sommerfeltia 14: 1–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetmore, C. (2004) The isidiate corticolous Caloplaca species in North and Central America. Bryologist 107: 284–292.Google Scholar
White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies. In PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J. & White, T. J., eds): 315–322. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar