Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:50:20.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTION FRONTIERS IN THE AFTERMATH OF RECESSIONS: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2013

Dimitris Christopoulos
Affiliation:
Panteion University
Miguel A. León-Ledesma*
Affiliation:
University of Kent
*
Address correspondence to: Miguel León-Ledesma, School of Economics, Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT27NP, UK; e-mail: m.a.leon-ledesma@kent.ac.uk.

Abstract

The relationship between recessions and productivity growth has been the focus of an important body of theoretical and empirical research in the last two decades. We contribute to this literature by presenting new evidence on the evolution of productivity in the aftermath of recessions. Our method allows us to distinguish between frontier and (in-)efficiency effects of recessions. We present international evidence for a panel of 70 countries for the period 1960–2000. Our results reveal that the average cumulative impact of recessions on productivity up to four years after their end is negative and significant. This, however, results from a mixture of mechanisms. The level of frontier production increases, but the rate of technical progress decreases, leading to a fall in frontier production. Efficiency also falls, lending support to the idea that recessions tend to reduce, rather than increase, economic restructuring. Long and deep recessions are also shown to have distinctive impacts on productivity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aghion, Philippe and Saint-Paul, Giles (1991) On the Virtue of Bad Times: An Analysis of the Interaction between Economic Fluctuations and Productivity Growth. DELTA working papers 91/23.Google Scholar
Aghion, Philippe and Saint-Paul, Giles (1998) Uncovering some causal relationships between productivity growth and the structure of economic fluctuations: A tentative survey. Labour 12, 279303.Google Scholar
Aigner, Dennis, Lovell, C.A. Knox, and Schmidt, Peter (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier function models. Journal of Econometrics 6, 2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbache, Jorge S. and Page, John (2010) How fragile is Africa's recent growth? Journal of African Economies 19, 124.Google Scholar
Arrow, J. Kenneth (1962) The economic implications of learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies 29, 155173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baily, Martin N., Bartelsman, Eric J., and Haltiwanger, John (2001) Labor productivity: Structural change and cyclical dynamics. Review of Economics and Statistics 83, 420433.Google Scholar
Barlevy, Gadi (2002) The sullying effects of recessions. Review of Economic Studies 69, 6596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlevy, Gadi (2003) Credit market frictions and the allocation of resources over the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 17951818.Google Scholar
Barlevy, Gadi (2007) On the cyclicality of research and development. American Economic Review 97, 11311164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. and Lee, Jong-Wha (2000) International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications. NBER working paper 7911.Google Scholar
Bartelsman, Eric J., Haltiwanger, John, and Scarpetta, Stefano (2004) Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 114/3.Google Scholar
Battese, George E. and Broca, Sumiter S. (1997) Functional forms of stochastic frontier production function and models for technical inefficiency effects: A comparative study for wheat framers in Pakistan. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 395414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battese, George E. and Coelli, Tim J. (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production for panel data. Empirical Economics 20, 325332.Google Scholar
Bean, Charles (1990) Endogenous growth and the procyclical behaviour of productivity. European Economic Review 34, 355363.Google Scholar
Bils, Mark J. and Klenow, Pete J. (2000) Does schooling cause growth? American Economic Review 90, 11601183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Ricardo J. and Hammour, Mohamad L. (1994) The cleansing effects of recessions. American Economic Review 84, 13501368.Google Scholar
Caballero, Ricardo J. and Hammour, Mohamad L. (2005) The cost of recessions revisited: A reverse-liquidationist view. Review of Economic Studies 72, 313341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John Y. and Mankiw, N. Gregory (1987) Are output fluctuations transitory? Quarterly Journal of Economics 102, 857880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerra, Valerie and Saxena, Sweta C. (2007) Growth Dynamics: The Myth of Economic Recovery. BIS working paper 226.Google Scholar
Cerra, Valerie and Saxena, Sweta C. (2008) Growth dynamics: The myth of economic recovery. American Economic Review 98, 439457.Google Scholar
Christopoulos, Dimitris (2007) Explaining country efficiency performance. Economic Modelling 24, 224235.Google Scholar
Davis, Steven J. and Haltiwanger, John (1992) Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 819864.Google Scholar
Davis, Steven J., Haltiwanger, John, and Schuh, Scott (1996) Job Creation and Destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, John and Papageorgiou, Chris (2000) A cross-country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 86120.Google Scholar
Farrell, M.J. (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A) 120, 253281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, Patrick and Lloyd-Ellis, Huw (2003) Animal spirits through creative destruction. American Economic Review 93, 530550.Google Scholar
Garcia, Fernando, de Souza, Rogerio C., and Pires, Jorge Oliveira (2008) Technical change: It should be positive and make sense! Economics Letters 100, 388391.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. (2005) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics 126, 269303.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. (2008) The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In Fried, Harold O., Lovell, C.A. Knox, and Schmidt, Peter (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth, pp. 92250. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, Rachel, Redding, Stephen, and Van Reenen, John (2004) Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 883895.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert E. (1991) Labor demand, labor supply, and employment volatility. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 17–62.Google Scholar
Henry, Michael, Kneller, Robert, and Milner, Chris (2009) Trade, technology transfer and national efficiency in developing countries. European Economic Review 53, 237254.Google Scholar
Huang, Cliff J. and Jin-Tan Liu (1994) Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function. Journal of Productivity Analysis 5, 171180.Google Scholar
Jondrow, James, Lovell, C.A. Knox, Materov, Ivan S., and Schmidt, Peter (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in stochastic production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19, 233238.Google Scholar
Klenow, Pete J. and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés (2004) Externalities and Growth. NBER working paper 11009.Google Scholar
Klump, Rainer, McAdam, Peter, and Willman, Alpo (2007) Factor substitution and factor augmenting technical progress in the US. Review of Economic Studies 89, 182192.Google Scholar
Kneller, Robert and Stevens, P. Andrew (2003) The specification of aggregate production function in the presence of inefficiency. Economics Letters 81, 223226.Google Scholar
Kumbhakar, Subal C. and Lovell, C.A. Knox (2000) Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kumbhakar, Subal C. and Wang, Hung-Jen (2005) Estimation of growth convergence using a stochastic production frontier approach. Economics Letters 88, 300305.Google Scholar
León-Ledesma, Miguel A., McAdam, Peter, and Willman, Alpo (2010) Identifying the elasticity of substitution with biased technical change. American Economic Review 100, 13301357.Google Scholar
Levin, Andrew, Lin, Chien-Fu, and Chu, Chia-Shang J. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108, 124.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, Kiminori (1999) Growing through cycles. Econometrica 67, 335347.Google Scholar
McAdam, Peter and Willman, Alpo (in press) Medium run redux. Macroeconomic Dynamics.Google Scholar
Miller, Stephen M. and Upadhyay, Mukti P. (2000) The effects of openness, trade orientation and human capital on total factor productivity. Journal of Development Economics 63, 399423.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Min (2009) The scarring effect of recessions. Journal of Monetary Economics 56, 184199.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Min (in press) Plant life cycle and aggregate employment dynamics. Macroeconomic Dynamics.Google Scholar
Posch, Olaf and Wälde, Klaus (2011) On the link between volatility and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 16, 285308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Carmen M. and Rogoff, Kenneth S. (2009) The aftermath of financial crises. American Economic Review 99, 466472.Google Scholar
Senhadji, Abdelhak (2000) Sources of economic growth: An extensive growth accounting exercise. IMF Staff Papers 47, 129158.Google Scholar
Stadler, George W. (1990) Business cycle models with endogenous technology. American Economic Review 80, 763778.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph (1993) Endogenous Growth and Cycles. NBER working paper 4286.Google Scholar
Trostel, Philip, Walke, Ian, and Woolley, Paul (2002) Estimates of the economic returns to schooling for 28 countries. Labour Economics 9, 116.Google Scholar
Wälde, Klaus (2005) Endogenous growth cycles. International Economic Review 46, 867894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar