Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:38:13.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WEALTH INEQUALITY, OR r – g, IN THE ECONOMIC GROWTH MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Ryoji Hiraguchi
Ryoji Hiraguchi*
Affiliation:
Meiji University
*
Address correspondence to: Ryoji Hiraguchi, School of Political Science and Economics, Meiji University, 1-1, Kanda-surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan; e-mail: hiraguchi@meiji.ac.jp.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I investigate a simple continuous-time overlapping generations model with a neoclassical production function. I demonstrate that the degree of wealth inequality is positively related to the difference between the real interest rate r and the growth rate of income g, and if g falls, the r – g gap widens and inequality worsens. I also argue that a wealth tax reduces the wealth inequality. All these results are consistent with the famous predictions advanced by Thomas Piketty in Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014).

Keywords

Overlapping GenerationsInequalityWealth Tax
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 479 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study is conducted as a part of the Project “Sustainable Growth and Macroeconomic Policy” undertaken at Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI). I am grateful for helpful comments and suggestions by Hiroshi Yoshikawa, Takashi Unayama, Masayuki Keida, Koichi Ando, and Discussion Paper seminar participants at RIETI. I also thank three referees for their valuable comments.

References

REFERENCES

Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004) Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J. and Bisin, A. (2007) The Distribution of Wealth: Intergenerational Transmission and Redistributive Policies. Mimeo, New York University.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Bisin, A. and Zhu, S. (2011) The distribution of wealth and fiscal policy in economies with finitely lived agents. Econometrica 79, 123–157.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Bisin, A. and Zhu, S. (2016) The distribution of wealth in the Blanchard-Yaari model. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20, 466–481.10.1017/S1365100514000066Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. J. (1985) Debt, deficits and finite horizons. Journal of Political Economy 93, 223–47.10.1086/261297Google Scholar
García-Peñalosa, C. and Turnovsky, S. (2006) Growth and income inequality: A canonical model. Economic Theory 28, 25–49.10.1007/s00199-005-0616-7Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2014) Simple Models of Income and Wealth Inequality. Mimeo, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2015) Pareto and Piketty: The Macroeconomics of top income and wealth inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29, 29–46.10.1257/jep.29.1.29Google Scholar
Krusell, P. and Smith, A. (2015) Is Piketty's ‘Second Law of Capitalism’ fundamental? Journal of Political Economy 123, 725–748.10.1086/682574Google Scholar
Mankiw, G. and Weinzierl, M. (2006) Dynamic scoring: A back-of-the-envelope guide. Journal of Public Economics 90, 1415–1433.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.11.006Google Scholar
Moll, B. (2014) Lecture Notes 11 and 12: Income and Wealth Distribution in the Growth Model. Mimeo, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Nirei, M. and Aoki, S. (2015) Pareto Distribution of Income in Neoclassical Growth Models. Mimeo, Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674369542Google Scholar
Piketty, T. and Zucman, G. (2015) Wealth and inheritance in the long run. In Atkinson, A. and Bourguignon, E. (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2, pp. 1303–1368. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar