Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:57:24.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FISCAL SHOCKS IN A TWO-SECTOR OPEN ECONOMY WITH ENDOGENOUS MARKUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2014

Olivier Cardi*
Affiliation:
University Panthéon-Assas CRED
Romain Restout
Affiliation:
Université de Lorraine BETA and UCL IRES
*
Address correspondence to: Olivier Cardi, Université Panthéon-Assas Paris 2, CRED, 12 Place du Panthéon, 75230 Paris Cedex 05. France; e-mail: olivier.cardi@u-paris2.fr.

Abstract

We use a two-sector neoclassical open economy model with traded and nontraded goods and endogenous markups to investigate the effects of temporary fiscal shocks. One central finding is that theory can be reconciled with evidence once we allow for endogenous markups and assume that the traded sector is more capital-intensive than the nontraded sector. More precisely, although both ingredients are essential to produce the real exchange rate depreciation, only the second ingredient is necessary to account for the simultaneous decline in investment and the current account, in line with the evidence.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baxter, Marianne and King, Robert G. (1993) Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. American Economic Review 83 (3), 315334.Google Scholar
Benetrix, Agustin S. (2012) Fiscal shocks and real wages. International Journal of Finance and Economics 17 (3), 203220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benetrix, Agustin and Lane, Philip R. (2010) Fiscal shocks and the sectoral composition of output. Open Economies Review 21 (3), 335350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, Craig, Eichenbaum, Martin, and Fisher, Jonas D.M. (2004) Fiscal shocks and their consequences. Journal of Economic Theory 115, 89117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Ariel T., Neves, João C., and Rebelo, Sergio (2004) Investment prices and exchange rates: Some basic facts. Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2–3), 302309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardi, Olivier (2010) A note on the crowding-out of investment by public spending. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14 (4), 604615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardi, Olivier and Müller, Gernot (2011) Habit formation and fiscal transmission in open economies. Journal of International Economics 85, 256267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashin, Paul and McDermott, John C. (2003) Intertemporal substituion and terms-of-trade shocks. Review of International Economics 11 (4), 604618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsetti, Giancarlo, Meier, André, and Müller, Gernot J. (2012) What determines government spending multipliers? Economic Policy 27 (72), 521565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coto-Martinez, Javier and Dixon, Huw (2003) Profits, markups and entry: Fiscal policy in an open economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27 (4), 573597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domeij, David and Flodén, Martin (2006) The labor-supply elasticity and borrowing constraints: Why estimates are biased. Review of Economic Dynamics 9, 242262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, Zeno, Müller, Gernot, and Scholl, Almuth (2011) How do fiscal and technology shocks affect real exchange rates? New evidence for the United States. Journal of International Economics 83, 5369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, Jordi (1995) Product diversity, endogenous markups, and development traps. Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 3963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, Jordi, López-Salido, J. David, and Vallés, J. (2007) Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association 5 227270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert E. (2009) By how much does GDP rise if the government buys more output? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Fall, 183231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijdra, Ben (1998) Fiscal policy multipliers: The role of monopolistic competition, scale economies, and intertemporal substitution in labour supply. International Economic Review 39, 659696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijdra, Ben and Ligthart, Jenny E. (2010) The transitional dynamics of fiscal policy in small open economies Macroeconomic Dynamics 14 (1), 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Michael (2000) Sectoral shocks and aggregate fluctuations. Journal of Monetary Economics 45, 69106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaimovich, Nir and Floetotto, Joseph (2008) Firm dynamics, markup variations and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 55, 12381252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karayalçin, Cem (2003) Habit formation and government spending in a small open economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 7 (3), 407423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnemann, Ludger (2001) The price index effect, entry, and endogenous markups in a macroeconomic model of monopolistic competition. Journal of Macroeconomics 23, 441458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monacelli, Tommaso and Perotti, Robert (2010) Fiscal policy, the real exchange rate and traded goods. Economic Journal 120, 437461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappa, Evi (2009) The effects of fiscal shocks on employment and the real wage. International Economic Review 50, 217244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perotti, Roberto (2007) In Search of the Transmission Mechanism of Fiscal Policy. NBER working paper 13143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, Valerie A. (2011) Identifying government spending shocks: It's all in the timing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (1), 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Stefan F. and Turnovsky, Stephen J. (2002) The dynamics of temporary policies in a small open economy. Review of International Economics 10 (4), 604622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnovsky, Stephen J. and Sen, Partha (1995) Investment in a two-sector dependent economy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 9, 2955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar