Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:55:49.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GROWTH OPTION AND DEBT MATURITY WITH EQUITY DEFAULT SWAPS IN A REGIME-SWITCHING FRAMEWORK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2018

Pengfei Luo
Affiliation:
Hunan University
Zhaojun Yang*
Affiliation:
Southern University of Science and Technology
*
Address correspondence to: Zhaojun Yang, Department of Finance, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; e-mail: yangzj@sustc.edu.cn

Abstract

We consider a firm with assets-in-place and a growth option. There is a funding gap for the expansion investment, which is covered by entering into an equity-for-guarantee swap or fee-for-guarantee swap. We explicitly derive all contingent claim prices with the pricing and timing of the growth option taking business cycle and debt maturity into account. For short-term loan, we produce an explanation why Chinese government suggests that guarantee fee rate should be approximately the fraction 50% of the interest rate of bank loans with the same maturity, but for long-term debt, we show this fraction is too small.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank an anonymous referee and an associate editor for helpful comments. All errors and omissions are our own. The research for this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 71371068 and 71171078) and China Scholarship Fund for Studying Abroad (No. 201706130059).

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, M., Hackbarth, D., and Puhan, T. X. (2017) Financing Asset Sales and Business Cycles. Review of Finance (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Arnold, M., Wagner, A. F., and Westermann, R. (2013) Growth options, macroeconomic conditions, and the cross section of credit risk. Journal of Financial Economics 107 (2), 350385.Google Scholar
Bhamra, H., Kuehn, L. and Strebulaev, I. (2010) The levered equity risk premium and credit spreads: A unified framework. Review of Financial Studies 23, 645703.Google Scholar
Branch, W. A., Davig, T., and McGough, B. (2013) Adaptive learning in regime-switching models. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17 (5), 9981022.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. J. and Schwartz, E. S. (1985) Evaluating natural resource investments. Journal of Business 58 (2), 135157.Google Scholar
Chen, H. (2010) Macroeconomic conditions and the puzzles of credit spreads and capital structure. Journal of Finance 65, 21712212.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R., Ju, N., and Leland, H. (2001) An EBIT-based model of dynamic capital structure. Journal of Business 74 (4), 483512.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Miao, J., and Morellec, E. (2005) Irreversible investment with regime shifts. Journal of Economic Theory 122, 3759.Google Scholar
Hackbarth, D. and Mauer, D. C. (2012) Optimal priority structure, capital structure, and investment. Review of Financial Studies 25 (3), 747796.Google Scholar
Hackbarth, D., Miao, J., and Morellec, E. (2006) Capital structure, credit risk, and macroeconomic conditions. Journal of Financial Economics 82 (3), 519550.Google Scholar
Huang, J. and Huang, M. (2012) How much of the corporate-treasury yield spread is due to credit risk. Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2, 153202.Google Scholar
Jeon, H. and Nishihara, M. (2015) The effects of business cycle and debt maturity on a firm's investment and default decisions. International Review of Economics and Finance 38, 326351.Google Scholar
Karatzas, I. and Shreve, S. (1991) Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Korenok, O., Mizrach, B., and Radchenko, S. (2009) A note on demand and supply factors in manufacturing output asymmetries. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13 (2), 263277.Google Scholar
Leland, H. and Toft, K. (1996) Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads. Journal of Finance 51, 9871019.Google Scholar
Luo, P. F., Wang, H. M., and Yang, Z. J. (2016) Investment and financing for SMEs with a partial guarantee and jump risk. European Journal of Operational Research 249, 11611168.Google Scholar
Luo, P. F., Xiong, J., Yang, J. Q. and Yang, Z. J. (2017) Real options under a double exponential jump-diffusion model with regime switching and partial information. Quantitative Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2017.1328560Google Scholar
Luo, P. F. and Yang, Z. J. (2017) Real options and contingent convertibles with regime switching. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 75, 122135.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. and Siegel, D. (1986) The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 707727.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C. and Bodie, Z. (1992) On the management of financial guarantees. Financial Management 21 (4), 87109.Google Scholar
Morier, B. and Teles, V. K. (2016) A time-varying Markov-switching model for economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20 (6), 15501580.Google Scholar
Nason, J. M. and Tallman, E. W. (2015) Business cycles and financial crises: The roles of credit supply and demand shocks. Macroeconomic Dynamics 19 (4), 836882.Google Scholar
Pennacchi, G., Vermaelen, T., and Wolff, C. (2014) Contingent capital: The case of COERCs. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 49 (3), 541574.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Yang, Z., and Zhang, H. (2015) Entrepreneurial finance with equity-for-guarantee swap and idiosyncratic risk. European Journal of Operational Research 241 (3), 863871.Google Scholar
Xiang, H. and Yang, Z. (2015) Investment timing and capital structure with loan guarantees. Finance Research Letters 13, 179187.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. and Zhang, H. (2013) Optimal capital structure with an equity-for-guarantee swap. Economics Letters 118 (2), 355359.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. and Zhang, C. (2015) Two new equity default swaps with idiosyncratic risk. International Review of Economics and Finance 37, 254273.Google Scholar