Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:02:34.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE MACROECONOMIC AND WEALTH EFFECTS OF UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

Fredj Jawadi ,
Ricardo M. Sousa  and
Raffaella Traverso
Fredj Jawadi
Affiliation:
University of Evry
Ricardo M. Sousa*
Affiliation:
University of Minho, NIPE and LSE Alumni Association
Raffaella Traverso
Affiliation:
University of Minho
*
Address correspondence to: Ricardo M. Sousa, University of Minho, Department of Economics and Economic Policies Research Unit (NIPE), Campus of Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; e-mail: rjsousa@eeg.uminho.pt, rjsousa@alumni.lse.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the macroeconomic and wealth effects of unconventional monetary policy. To this end, we estimate a Bayesian structural vector autoregression (B-SVAR) using U.S. monthly data for the post-Lehman Brothers' collapse period. We show that a positive shock to the growth rate of central bank reserves does not have a substantial impact on industrial production or consumer prices. However, it also gives a strong boost to asset prices, which is larger in magnitude for stock prices than for housing prices. Thus, unconventional monetary policy typically operates via portfolio-rebalancing effects. A VAR counterfactual exercise confirms the role of the shocks to the growth rate of central bank reserves in explaining the dynamics of the variables included in the system, especially in the case of asset prices. Finally, additional empirical assessments uncover an important change in the conduct of monetary policy from “standard” to “exceptional” times and the suitability of our model to capture such a structural transformation.

Keywords

Unconventional Monetary PolicyMacroeconomic ImpactWealth EffectsBayesian Structural VAR
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 21 , Special Issue 5: Recent Topics in Computational Macroeconomics , July 2017 , pp. 1189 - 1204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to participants to the Third International Symposium in Computational Economics and Finance (ISCEF), organized in Paris on April 10–12 2014 (http://www.iscef.com), and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments that considerably improved this paper. Sousa acknowledges that this work has been financed by Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors—COMPETE and by National Funds through the FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology within the remit of the project “FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-037268 (PEst-C/EGE/UI3182/2013).” Traverso is also highly indebted to the suggestions made by Vitor Castro.

References

REFERENCES

Aït-Sahalia, Y., Andritzky, J., Jobst, A., Nowak, S., and Tamirisa, N. (2010) Market response to policy initiatives during the global financial crisis. Journal of International Economics 87 (1), 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernanke, B. and Reinhart, V. (2004) Conducting monetary policy at very low short-term interest rates. American Economic Review 94 (2), 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernanke, B., Reinhart, V., and Sack, B. (2004) Monetary policy alternatives at the zero bound: An empirical assessment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 35 (2), 1–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, A. (2000) Monetary policy at the zero lower bound: Balancing the risks. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 32 (4), 1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, J. and Thomas, R. (2011) The Impact of QE on the UK Economy-Some Supportive Monetarist Arithmetic. Working paper 442, Bank of England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, C., Eusepi, S., and Grisse, C. (2011) Unconventional Policies during the Crisis and Expectations of Inflation and Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis. Working paper, Federal Reserve of New York.Google Scholar
Castelnuovo, E. (2012) Policy switch and the Great Moderation: The role of equilibrium selection. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelnuovo, E., Greco, L., and Raggi, D. (2014) Policy rules, regime switches, and trend inflation: An empirical investigation for the United States. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18, 920–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Cúrdia, V., and Ferrero, A. (2012) The macroeconomic effects of large-scale asset purchase programs. Economic Journal 122 (564), F289–F315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., and Evans, C.L. (1996) The effects of monetary policy shocks: Evidence from the flow of funds. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (1), 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., and Evans, C.L. (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy 113 (1), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, H., Laforte, J.-P., Reifschneider, D., and Williams, J.C. (2012) Have we underestimated the likelihood and severity of zero lower bound events? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44 (S1), 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clouse, J., Henderson, D., Orphanides, A., Small, D., and Tinsley, P. (2003) Monetary policy when the nominal short-term interest rate is zero. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 3 (1), 1–65.Google Scholar
D'Amico, S., English, W., López-Sallido, D., and Nelson, E. (2012) The Federal Reserve's Large Scale Asset Purchase Programs: Rationale and Effects. Finance and economics discussion paper 85, Federal Reserve Board.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amico, S. and King, T.B. (2013) Flow and stock effects of large-scale treasury purchases. Journal of Financial Economics 108 (2), 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Negro, M., Eggertsson, G., Ferrero, A., and Kiyotaki, N. (2010) The Great Escape? A Quantitative Evaluation of the Fed's Non-standard Policies. Working paper, Princeton University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doh, T. (2010) The efficacy of large-scale asset purchases at the zero lower bound. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review QII, 5–34.Google Scholar
Gagnon, J., Raskin, M., Remache, J., and Sack, B. (2011) The financial market effects of the Federal Reserve's large-scale asset purchases. International Journal of Central Banking 7 (1), 3–43.Google Scholar
Greenspan, A. (2012) CNBC coverage of Greenspan by B.J. Navarro, July 12.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J.D. and Wu, J.C. (2012) The effectiveness of alternative monetary policy tools in a zero lower bound environment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44, 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, D. and Passmore, W. (2011) Did the Federal Reserve's MBS purchase program lower mortgage rates? Journal of Monetary Economics 58 (5), 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawadi, F. (2012) Introduction to time-varying modeling with macroeconomic and financial data. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16 (S2), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawadi, F. and Léoni, P. (2012) Nonlinearity, cyclicity and persistence in consumption and income relationships: Research in honor of Melvin J. Hinich. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16 (S3), 376–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, M., Lasaosa, A., Stevens, I., and Tong, M. (2011) The financial market impact of quantitative easing in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Central Banking 7 (3), 113–161.Google Scholar
Kapetanios, G., Mumtaz, H., Stevens, I., and Theodoridis, K. (2012) Assessing the economy-wide effects of quantitative easing. Economic Journal 122 (564), F316–F347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, T. and Small, D.H. (2006) Quantitative monetary easing and risk in financial asset markets. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 6, 1–54.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, A. and Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011) The effects of quantitative easing on interest rates. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 43 (2), 215–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacker, J. (2012) Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee: September 12–13. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Mallick, S.K. and Sousa, R.M. (2012) Real effects of monetary policy in large emerging economies. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16 (S2), 190–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, A. (2011) Panacea, Curse, or Nonevent? Unconventional Monetary Policy in the United Kingdom. Working paper 163, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Rudebusch, G.D., Sack, B.P., and Swanson, E.T. (2007) Macroeconomic implications of changes in the term premium. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 89 (4), 241–269.Google Scholar
Sims, C. and Zha, T. (1999) Error bands for impulse-responses. Econometrica 67 (5), 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, R.M. (2010) Housing wealth, financial wealth, money demand and policy rule: Evidence from the Euro area. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 21 (1), 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, R.M. (2014a) The effects of monetary policy in a small open economy: The case of Portugal. Applied Economics 46 (2), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, R.M. (2014b). Wealth, asset portfolio, money demand and policy rule. Bulletin of Economic Research 66 (1), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J.C. (2012) Evaluating Large-Scale Asset Purchases. Remarks at The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, October 11.Google Scholar
Takeda, Y. and Yajima, Y. (2014) Searching for the effects of unconventional monetary policy: The case of the Bank of Japan. Japanese Journal of Monetary and Financial Economics 2 (1), 1–58.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.B. (2013) The Fed's new view is a little less scary. Economics One blog, June 20.Google Scholar