Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:01:58.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOVEREIGN RESTRUCTURING VS. FISCAL ADJUSTMENT IN A MONETARY UNION: MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS FROM MODEL-BASED SIMULATIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2018

L. Forni  and
M. Pisani
L. Forni*
Affiliation:
University of Padua
M. Pisani
Affiliation:
Bank of Italy
*
Address correspondence to: Lorenzo Forni, Departments of Economics, Università di Padova, Via del Santo 33 - I-35123 Padova, Italy; e-mail: lorenzo.forni@unipd.it.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We assess the macroeconomic effects of a sovereign restructuring in a small economy belonging to a monetary union by simulating a dynamic general equilibrium model. We compare the macroeconomic outcome of restructuring with scenarios where the debt reduction is achieved via fiscal adjustment. In line with the empirical evidence, we assume that the sovereign debt is held by domestic agents and by agents in the rest of the monetary union; after the restructuring the sovereign borrowing rate increases and the increase is fully transmitted to the domestic households' borrowing rate; and the government cannot discriminate between domestic and foreign agents when restructuring. We also assume that the small economy does not exit from the monetary union after the restructuring and that the restructuring does not have systemic effects on the rest of the union. Our results suggest that the restructuring can imply persistent and large reduction of output, especially if the share of public debt held domestically is large, the private foreign debt is high, and the spread paid by the government and the households does increases.

Keywords

Fiscal PolicyDSGE ModelingSovereign Restructuring
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 470 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank for useful comments C. Cottarelli, C. Kamps, A. Locarno, D. Muir, M. Guerguil, P. Manasse, A. Notarpietro, and participants at the ECB Workshop “Challenges for Sovereign Debt Management in the EU” (October 2011) and the Bank of Poland “Central Bank Macroeconomic Modeling Workshop” (September 2012) and in seminars at the IMF Fiscal Affair Department (November 2011) and the University of Bologna (December 2011). We are solely responsible for any errors. The opinions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the Bank of Italy or the Eurosystem or the International Monetary Fund.

References

REFERENCES

Benigno, P. (2009) Price stability with imperfect financial integration. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41 (s1), 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broner, F., Martin, A., and Ventura, J. (2010) Sovereign risk and secondary markets. American Economic Review 100 (4), 1–34.Google Scholar
Coenen, G., McAdam, P., and Straub, R. (2008) Tax reform and labour-market performance in the Euro Area: A simulation-based analysis using the new area-wide model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32 (8), 2543–2583.Google Scholar
Corsetti, G., Kuester, K., Meier, A., and Mueller, G. (2012) Sovereign Risk, Fiscal Policy and Macroeconomic Stability. IMF working paper, 12/33.Google Scholar
Cruces, J.J. and Trebesh, C. (2013) Sovereign defaults: The price of haircuts. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5 (3), 85–117.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. and Gersovitz, M. (1981) Debt with potential repudiation: Theoretical and empirical analysis. Review of Economic Studies 48 (2), 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escolano, J., Jaramillo, L., Mulas-Granados, C., and Terrier, G. (2014) How Much Is a Lot? Historical Evidence on the Size of Fiscal Adjustments. IMF working paper 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat (2014) Taxation Trends in the European Union Report.Google Scholar
Fernández, R. and Martin, A. (2014) The Long and the Short of It: Sovereign Debt Crisis and Debt Maturities. NBER working paper 20786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forni, L., Gerali, A., and Pisani, M. (2010a) The macroeconomics of fiscal consolidations in Euro Area countries. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34 (9), 1791–1812.Google Scholar
Forni, L., Gerali, A., and Pisani, M. (2010b) Macroeconomic effects of greater competition in the service sector: The case of Italy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14, 677–708.Google Scholar
Forni, L., Monteforte, L., and Sessa, L. (2009) The general equilibrium effects of fiscal policy: Estimates for the Euro Area. Journal of Public Economics 93 (3–4), 559–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, S., Jacquinot, P., and Pisani, M. (2010) The EAGLE. A Model for Policy Analysis of Macroeconomic Interdependence in the Euro Area. ECB working paper 1195.Google Scholar
Guerrieri, L., Iacoviello, M., and Minetti, R. (2013) Banks, sovereign debt and the international transmission of business cycles. NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 9, 181–213.Google Scholar
Kollmann, R., Ratto, M., Roeger, W., and Veld, J. in't (2013) Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37 (2), 387–403.Google Scholar
OECD (2014) Sovereign Borrowing Outlook Report.Google Scholar
Panizza, U., Sturzenegger, F., and Zettelmeyer, J. (2009) The economics and law of sovereign debt and default. Journal of Economic Literature 47 (3), 651–698.Google Scholar
Pesenti, P. (2008) The global economy model (GEM): Theoretical framework. IMF Staff Papers 55 (2), 243–284.Google Scholar