Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:13:41.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editor's Introduction – Autonomy of Inquiry: Shaping the Future of Emerging Scientific Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Anne S. Tsui
Anne S. Tsui*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, USA Peking University, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over two decades, research in Chinese management has exploited existing questions, theories, constructs, and methods developed in the Western context. Lagging are exploratory studies to address questions relevant to Chinese firms and to develop theories that offer meaningful explanations of Chinese phenomena. Framed as a debate between pursuing a theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management, this forum, through the voices of thirteen scholars, provides an analysis of the reasons for the current status of Chinese management research and offers alternatives to shape the future of Chinese management studies. Based on the principle of autonomy of inquiry and heeding the warning of the constraint of normal science, the Chinese management research community can shape its own future by engaging in research that may contribute to global management knowledge and address meaningful local management problems.

Keywords

autonomy of inquiryChinese managementetic versus emicexploitation versus explorationindigenous researchquality versus quantity中国管理开发性研究与探索性研究客位与主位定性与定杄本土研究研究自主性
Type
From the Editors
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babbie, E. R. 2007. The practice of social research (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publication.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. 1984. The Chicago school of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. 2000. Alice's adventures in wonderland. New York: Signet Classic Printing.Google Scholar
Cheng, B.-S., Wang, A.-C., & Huang, M.-P. 2009. The road more popular versus the road less travelled: An ‘insider's’ perspective of advancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J. 2009. Context, comparison and methodology in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, F. L. 2008. Enterprise culture management in China: Insiders' perspectives. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 1990. Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straightjacket? Organization Science, 1(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.Google Scholar
Glaser, B.J., & Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. 2007. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1348–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, A. 1964. The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral sciences. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.Google Scholar
Krug, B., & Hendrischke, H. 2008. Framing China: Transformation and institutional change through co-evolution. Management and Organization Review, 4(1): 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1996. The structure of scientific revolution (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2007. The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3): 510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. 2009. Never the twain shall meet? Integrating Chinese and Western management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. T., & Tsui, A. S. 2002. A citation analysis of management and organization research in the Chinese context: 1984 to 1999. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1): 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 2005. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1(1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 2005. Developing theory about the development of theory. In Smith, K. G. & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development: 355–372. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitroff, I. 1998. Smart thinking for crazy times: The art of solving the right problems. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1968. The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2005. Great minds in management: The process of theory development. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, E. W. K. 2009. Chinese management research at a crossroads: Some philosophical considerations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Schoonhoven, C. B., Meyer, M., Lau, C. M., & Milkovich, G. 2004. Organization and management in the midst of societal transformation: The People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2): 133–144.Google Scholar
Von Glinow, M. A., & Teagarden, M. B. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: Rigour and relevance redux. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 75–89.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
White, S. 2002. Rigor and relevance in Asian management research: Where are we and where can we go? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 287–352.Google Scholar
Xu, D., & Zhou, C. 2004. The current status of strategic management research in China. Management World, 5: 76–87. (In Chinese), (2004), , 5: 76–87.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. 2007. 100 Tang and Song Ci Poems. Beijing: China Translation and Publication Corporation.Google Scholar
Zhao, S., & Jiang, C. 2009. Learning by doing: Emerging paths of Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar