Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:57:12.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Domestic Firms Absorb Spillovers: A Routine-Based Model of Absorptive Capacity View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2018

Cheng-Hua Tzeng*
Affiliation:
Fudan University, China

Abstract

Extant spillover literature explains domestic firms' productivity change mainly by the presence and attributes of foreign direct investment. In contrary, this paper, by adopting a routine-based model of absorptive capacity, intends to explore how domestic firms absorb spillovers over time. Based on a qualitative study of a domestic firm in China's silicone adhesive industry, the findings show that unbounded by geographical constraints, domestic firms enact their external absorptive capacity routines to actively search for spillovers from multinational enterprises (MNEs) at both national and international levels. Moreover, rather than searching for what is available, domestic firms are selective for spillovers that are coherent with their business strategies. The most unexpected finding is that domestic firms diligently acquire spillovers from MNEs and from local competitors in combination. Spillovers acquired from local competitors are used to increase the inferential accuracy of spillovers acquired from MNEs about strategic successes. Further, instead of absorbing spillovers from MNEs which pose moderate technology gaps, domestic firms target at MNEs which exhibit wider technology gaps, and undertake organizational learning and develop complementary assets to enhance their internal absorptive capacity routines. Socially enabling mechanisms are found to facilitate domestic firms' absorption of spillovers by employee turnover.

摘要:

摘要:

现有的知识外溢文献主要是从外商直接投资的种种特性来解释本土企业生产力的变化。本文采用基于惯例的吸收能力模型, 研究本土企业如何吸收知识外溢。透过一个生产有机硅胶粘剂中国企业的案例研究, 结果表明, 本土企业吸收知识外溢并不会受到地理位置的限制;相反, 本土企业会透过其外部吸收能力的惯例, 积极地在国内外大范围搜寻跨国企业所带来的知识外溢。此外, 本土企业不是一味地搜寻既有的知识外溢, 而是主动挑选与其商业战略相符合的知识外溢。最意外的发现是, 本土公司企图积极地从跨国公司和当地竞争对手身上获取知识外溢。从当地竞争对手那所获得的知识外溢主要用来提高本土企业准确地推断从跨国公司那里获取的有关战略成功的知识外溢。为了从技术差距较大的跨国企业身上获取知识外溢, 本土企业会透过组织学习和发展互补性资产来提高其内部吸收能力的惯例。最后, 本研究也发现, 社会支持机制可以促进本土企业透过从其他企业跳槽过来的员工来吸收知识外溢。

वर्तमान संसाधन प्लवन शोध साहित्य स्वदेशीय फर्मों के उत्पादकता परिवर्तन को मुख्यतः विदेशी सीधे निवेश की उपस्थिति व गुणों के आधार पर समझाता है. इसके विपरीत यह शोध पत्र अवशोषक क्षमता के नैत्यिक आदर्श को अपनाते हुए यह अनुसंधान करने का इच्छुक है कि किस प्रकार स्वदेशीय कंपनियां समय के अंतराल में संसाधन प्लवन को लीं करती हैं. चीन के सिलिकॉन आसंजक उद्योग की स्वदेशीय फर्म के गुणात्मक अध्ययन के आधार पर हमारे परिणाम यह दिखाते हैं की भौगोलिक सीमितताओं से मुक्त, स्वदेशीय फर्म अपनी अवशोषक क्षमता को देशीय व विदेशी स्तर पर बहुराष्ट्रीय कंपनियों के संसाधन प्लवन अवसरों को खोजने के लिए प्रयोग करते हैं. साथ ही देशीय स्तर पर उपलब्ध संसाधनों पर न सीमित हो, स्वदेशीय फर्म अपनी रणनीति से संगत नियत संसाधन प्लवन पर केंद्रित होते हैं. सबसे अप्रत्याशित परिणाम यह है कि स्वदेशीय फर्म देशीय व बहुराष्ट्रीय उद्यमों से तत्परता से, संयुक्त रूप से संसाधन प्लवन अधिगृहीत करते हैं. देशीय प्रतिस्पर्धियों से अधिगृहीत प्लवन का प्रयोग रणनैतिक सफलता हेतु बहुराष्ट्रीय उद्यमों से अधिगृहीत क्षमता की आनुमानिक सटीकता को बढ़ाने के लिए किया जाता है. साथ ही स्वदेशीय फर्म मध्यम तकनीकी अंतर वाले बहुराष्ट्रीय उद्यम के प्लवन को आत्मसात करने की जगह संगठनीय विज्ञता व पूरक क्षमता बढ़ने हेतु अधिक तकनीकी अंतर वाले बहुराष्ट्रीय उद्यमों पर लक्ष्य करती हैं जिससे आंतरिक परिपोषक क्षमता बढ़ सके. कर्मचारी विच्छेद से प्लवन अवशोषण को सुगम करने वाली सामाजिक सामर्थ्य वर्धक प्रक्रियाएं भी इस शोध में देखी गयीं.

Sumário:

SUMÁRIO:

A literatura existente sobre spillovers explica a mudança de produtividade das empresas domésticas principalmente pela presença e atributos do investimento estrangeiro direto. Em contraste, este artigo, adotando um modelo baseado em rotina da capacidade de absorção, pretende explorar como as empresas domésticas absorvem spillovers ao longo do tempo. Com base em um estudo qualitativo de uma empresa doméstica na indústria de adesivos de silicone da China, os resultados mostram que ilimitadas por restrições geográficas, as empresas domésticas promovem suas rotinas externas de capacidade de absorção para procurar ativamente spillovers de empresas multinacionais (MNEs) a nível nacional e internacional. Além disso, em vez de procurar pelo que está disponível, as empresas domésticas são seletivas para spillovers coerentes com suas estratégias de negócios. A descoberta mais inesperada é que as firmas domésticas diligentemente adquirem spillovers de MNEs e de concorrentes locais em combinação. Spillovers adquiridos de concorrentes locais são usados para aumentar a precisão inferencial de spillovers adquiridos de MNEs sobre sucessos estratégicos. Além disso, em vez de absorver spillovers de MNEs que apresentam falhas tecnológicas moderadas, as empresas domésticas visam MNEs que exibem maiores lacunas tecnológicas e realizam o aprendizado organizacional e desenvolvem ativos complementares para aprimorar suas rotinas internas de capacidade de absorção.

Mecanismos socialmente capacitantes são encontrados para facilitar a absorção de spillovers pelas empresas domésticas pela rotatividade de funcionários.

Аннотация:

АННОТАЦИЯ:

В обширной литературе о распространении знаний, изменение производительности местных фирм объясняется, главным образом, наличием и особенностями прямых иностранных инвестиций. Данная работа, напротив, на основании рутинной модели поглощающей способности, ставит своей целью исследовать, каким образом национальные фирмы поглощают спилловеры знаний с течением времени. Результаты качественного исследования, проведенного в национальных компаниях, которые работают в кремнийорганической промышленности в Китае, показывают, что, при условии отсутствия географических ограничений, местные компании внедряют свои процедуры внешней поглощающей способности, чтобы активно искать спилловеры знаний от многонациональных компаний (МНК) на национальном и международном уровнях. Более того, вместо того, чтобы искать то, что доступно, национальные компании весьма избирательны и стремятся к знаниям, которые соответствуют стратегиям их бизнеса. Самое неожиданное открытие заключается в том, что национальные фирмы усердно приобретают знания одновременно как от МНК, так и от местных конкурентов. Знания, приобретенные у местных конкурентов, используются для увеличения достоверности знаний о стратегических успехах, которые получены от МНК. Кроме того, вместо поглощения знаний от МНК с незначительными технологическими преимуществами, национальные фирмы ориентируются на МНК с большими технологическими преимуществами, а также проводят организационное обучение и вкладывают дополнительные средства для усиления своих процедур внутренней поглощающей способности. Мы также обнаружили, что социально-стимулирующие механизмы способствуют поглощению знаний в национальных компаниях из-за текучести кадров.

Resumen:

RESUMEN:

La literatura existente sobre el spillover explica el cambio de productividad de las empresas nacionales principalmente por la presencia y atributos de la inversión extranjera directa. Por el contrario, este artículo al adoptar un modelo basado en rutina de capacidad de absorción intenta explorar cómo las empresas nacionales absorben spillovers a lo largo del tiempo. Con base en un estudio cualitativo de una empresa nacional de la industria de adhesivos de silicona en China, los hallazgos muestran que, sin limitaciones de restricciones geográficas, las empresas nacionales promulgan sus rutinas de capacidad de absorción externa mediante la búsqueda activa de spillovers de empresas multinacionales tanto a nivel nacional como internacional. Además, en lugar de buscar por lo que está disponible, las empresas nacionales son selectivas para los spillovers que sean coherentes con sus estrategias de negocio. El hallazgo más inesperado es que las empresas domésticas de manera diligente adquieren en combinación spillovers de las empresas multinacionales y de competidores locales. Los spillovers que se adquieren de los competidores locales son usados para aumentar la precisión inferencial de los spillovers adquiridos de las empresas multinacionales acerca de los éxitos estratégicos. Además, en lugar de absorber spillovers de las empresas multinacionales que poseen brechas tecnológicas moderadas, las empresas nacionales tiene como objetivo las multinacionales que demuestran brechas tecnológicas más amplias, y emprenden aprendizaje organizacional y desarrollaran activos complementarios para aumentar sus rutinas de capacidad de absorción interna. Los mecanismos socialmente favorables se encuentran para facilitar la absorción de spillovers de las empresas nacionales por la rotación de empleados.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. 2004. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (8): 887907.Google Scholar
Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. 1999. Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89 (3): 605618.Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 31 (4): 27132739.Google Scholar
Balsvik, R. 2011. Is labor mobility a channel for spillovers from multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (1): 285297.Google Scholar
Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. 1998. Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12 (3): 247277.Google Scholar
Caves, R. E. 1974. Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host country markets. Economica, 41 (162): 176193.Google Scholar
Chang, S. J., & Xu, D. 2008. Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (5): 495518.Google Scholar
Chen, L. C. 2009. Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan's machine tool industry. Research Policy, 38 (3): 527535.Google Scholar
Chen, T.-P. 2016. The rice cooker has become a test of China's ability to fix its economy. Wall Street Journal, August 3.Google Scholar
Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of ‘best practices’ of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 663680.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99 (397): 569596.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128152.Google Scholar
Cui, L., Li, Y., Meyer, K. E., & Li, Z. 2015. Leadership experience meets ownership structure: Returnee managers and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Management International Review, 55 (3): 355387.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1992. A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Denrell, J. 2003. Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organization Science, 14 (3): 227243.Google Scholar
Eapen, A. 2012. Social structure and technology spillovers from foreign to domestic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (3): 244263.Google Scholar
Eden, L. 2009. Letter from the editor-in-chief: FDI spillovers and linkages. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (7):10651069.Google Scholar
Eden, L., Levitas, E., & Martinez, R. J. 1997. The production, transfer and spillover of technology: Comparing large and small multinationals as technology producers. Small Business Economics, 9 (1): 5366.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532550.Google Scholar
Fosfuri, A., Motta, M., & Rønde, T. 2001. Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers' mobility. Journal of International Economics, 53 (1): 205222.Google Scholar
Fu, X. 2012. Foreign direct investment and managerial knowledge spillovers through the diffusion of management practices. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (5): 970999.Google Scholar
Girma, S. 2005. Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: A threshold regression analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67 (3): 281306.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 2009. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine-Athestor.Google Scholar
Görg, H., & Strobl, E. 2001. Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis. The Economic Journal, 111 (475): F723–F739.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (S2): 109122.Google Scholar
Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. 2007. Learning and strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 1 (1): 479511.Google Scholar
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (6): 11831194.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3 (3): 383397.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. 2006. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 833863.Google Scholar
Lewin, A.Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. 2011. Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22 (1): 8198.Google Scholar
Li, H., Zhang, Y. A., & Lyles, M. 2013. Knowledge spillovers, search, and creation in China's emerging market. Management and Organization Review, 9 (3): 395412.Google Scholar
MacKay, R. B., & Chia, R. 2013. Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of Northco Automotive. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (1): 208230.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E. 2004. Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (4): 259276.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E., & Sinani, E. 2009. When and where does foreign direct investment generate positive spillovers? A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (7): 10751094.Google Scholar
Patibandla, M., & Petersen, B. 2002. Role of transnational corporations in the evolution of a high-tech industry: The case of India's software industry. World Development, 30 (9): 15611577.Google Scholar
Peeters, C., Massini, S., & Lewin, A. Y. 2014. Sources of variation in the efficiency of adopting management innovation: The role of absorptive capacity routines, managerial attention and organizational legitimacy. Organization Studies, 35 (9): 13431371.Google Scholar
Perri, A., & Peruffo, E. 2016. Knowledge spillovers from FDI: A critical review from the international business perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18 (1): 327.Google Scholar
Ready, D. A., Hill, L. A., & Conger, J. A. 2008. Winning the race for talent in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 86 (11): 6270.Google Scholar
Rhee, Y. W., Ross-Larson, B., & Pursell, G. 1984. Korea's competitive edge: Managing the entry into world markets. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schildt, H., Keil, T., & Maula, M. 2012. The temporal effects of relative and firm- level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 33 (10): 11541173.Google Scholar
Sinani, E., & Meyer, K. E. 2004. Spillovers of technology transfer from FDI: The case of Estonia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32 (3): 445466.Google Scholar
Smeets, R. 2008. Collecting the pieces of the FDI knowledge spillovers puzzle. The World Bank Research Observer, 23 (2): 107138.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. W. 2008. The impact of multinational enterprise strategy on indigenous enterprises: Horizontal spillovers and crowding out in developing countries. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2): 341361.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. J., & Peterson, R. B. 1991. A test of theories underlying the Japanese lifetime employment system. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (1): 7997.Google Scholar
Sun, P. Y., & Anderson, M. H. 2010. An examination of the relationship between absorptive capacity and organizational learning, and a proposed integration. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (2): 130150.Google Scholar
Terlaak, A., & Gong, Y. 2008. Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 846868.Google Scholar
Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. 2007. Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3):774786.Google Scholar
Tsang, E.W. K. 2014. Generalizing from research findings: The merits of case studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16 (4): 369383.Google Scholar
Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. 2010. Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21 (4): 931951.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 185203.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Li, H., Li, Y., & Zhou, L. A. 2010. FDI spillovers in an emerging market: The role of foreign firms' country origin diversity and domestic firms' absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (9): 969989.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Li, H. 2014. FDI spillovers over time in an emerging market: The roles of entry tenure and barriers to imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 57 (3): 698722.Google Scholar