Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:00:02.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technological Capability, Marketing Capability, and FirmPerformance in Turbulent Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Zhongfeng Su
Affiliation:
Nanjing University, China
Jisheng Peng
Affiliation:
Nanjing University, China
Hao Shen
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Ting Xiao
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, USA

Abstract

The manner in which technological capability and marketing capability can besuccessfully leveraged is an important research issue. Based on theresource-management model, this study aims to answer two research questions:(1) whether technological capability and marketing capability arecomplementary or supplementary capabilities; and (2) how technologicalcapability and marketing capability can be used appropriately to respond toenvironmental turbulence. Based on a face-to-face interview survey of 212Chinese firms, we find that technological capability and marketingcapability have synergistic effects. We also find that technologicalturbulence enhances the performance effect of technological capability, butimpedes that of marketing capability; whereas market turbulence advances theperformance effect of marketing capability, but impedes that oftechnological capability. Thus, the appropriate way to leveragetechnological capability and marketing capability is to integrate them andto deploy technological capability to respond to technological turbulenceand marketing capability to respond to market turbulence.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acquaah, M. 2007. Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12): 12351255.10.1002/smj.63210.1002/smj.632Google Scholar
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. R., & Zeithami, C. P. 1984. Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1): 524.10.2307/25595410.2307/255954Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411423.10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.41110.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411Google Scholar
Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3): 396402.10.2307/315078310.1177/002224377701400320Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantagc. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99120.10.1177/014920639101700108Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. 2001. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In Hitt, M. A. Freeman, R. E. & Harrison, J. S. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management: 124188. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. 2003. The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2): 90103.10.1111/1540-5885.200200310.1111/1540-5885.2002003Google Scholar
Chen, M. 2001. Inside Chinese business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128152.10.2307/239355310.2307/2393553Google Scholar
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 7587.10.1002/smj.425010010710.1002/smj.4250100107Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1971. Test validation. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.): 443507. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Day, G. S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 3752.10.2307/125191510.1177/002224299405800404Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 3950.10.2307/315131210.1177/002224378101800104Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strateg formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114135.10.2307/4116666410.2307/41166664Google Scholar
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. 1998. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(10): 3045.10.2307/125228510.1177/002224299806200403Google Scholar
Hatcher, L. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS(R) system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E. 2000. Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capacities. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 955959.10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<955::AID-SMJ136>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<955::AID-SMJ136>3.0.CO;2-S3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<955::AID-SMJ136>3.0.CO;2-S>Google Scholar
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences . Journal of Marketing, 57(3): 5370.10.2307/125185410.1177/002224299305700304Google Scholar
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 118.10.1177/002224299005400201Google Scholar
Krasnikov, A., & Jayachandran, S. 2008. The relative impact of marketing, research-and- development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 111.10.1509/jmkg.72.4.001Google Scholar
Lambkin, M., & Day, G. S. 1989. Evolutionary processes in competitive markets: Beyond the product life cycle. Journal of Marketing, 53(3): 420.10.2307/125133910.1177/002224298905300304Google Scholar
Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Chan, T. S. 2005. Entrepreneurial strategy making and performance in China's new technology ventures: The contingency effect of environments and firm competences. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16(1): 3757.10.1016/j.hitech.2005.06.00310.1016/j.hitech.2005.06.003Google Scholar
Li, J., Chen, D., & Shapiro, D. M. 2010. Product innovations in emerging economies: The role of foreign knowledge access channels and internal efforts in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 243266.10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00155.xS174087760000217510.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00155.xGoogle Scholar
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2008. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 383400.10.1002/smj.66510.1002/smj.665Google Scholar
Li, Y., Lee, S. H., Li, X., & Liu, Y. 2010. Knowledge codification, exploitation, and innovation: The moderating influence of organizational controls in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 219241.10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00179.xS174087760000216310.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00179.xGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, B. M. B., & Brush, C. G. 2001. How do ‘resource bundles’ develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3): 3758.10.1177/10422587010250030310.1177/104225870102500303Google Scholar
Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Howell, R. 1996. The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intra-organizational relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4): 299314.10.1177/009207039624400210.1177/0092070396244002Google Scholar
Moorman, C., & Slotegraaf, R. J. 1999. The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2): 239257.10.2307/315209610.1177/002224379903600208Google Scholar
Neter, J., William, W., & Kutner, M. H. 1985. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin.Google Scholar
Noda, T., & Collis, D. J. 2001. The evolution of intra-industry firm heterogeneity: Insights from a process study. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 897925.10.2307/306942110.2307/3069421Google Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275296.10.2307/30040713Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 486501.10.2307/155640610.2307/1556406Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., Zhou, Y., & York, A. S. 2006. Behind make or buy decisions in export strategy: A replication and extension of Trabold. Journal of World Business, 41(3): 289300.10.1016/j.jwb.2006.01.00610.1016/j.jwb.2006.01.006Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4): 599620.10.2307/258592Google Scholar
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 2240.10.2307/259392Google Scholar
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8): 729753.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-410.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-43.0.CO;2-410.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4>Google Scholar
Shrout, P., & Fleiss, J. L. 1979. Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2): 420428.10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.42010.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420Google Scholar
Sirmon, D. G., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. 2008. Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: The effects of resource bundling and deployment. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (5): 918935.10.5465/amj.2008.34789656Google Scholar
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 339358.10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-0001310.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013Google Scholar
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 273292.10.5465/AMR.2007.2346600510.5465/amr.2007.23466005Google Scholar
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1994. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 4655.10.2307/125225010.1177/002224299405800104Google Scholar
Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. 1986. Strategy and the environment: A study of corporate responses to crises. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3): 199213.10.1002/smj.4250050302Google Scholar
Song, M., DiBenedetto, A., & Nason, R. W. 2007. Capabilities and financial performance: The moderating effect of strategic type. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1): 1834.10.1007/s11747-006-0005-110.1007/s11747-006-0005-1Google Scholar
Song, M., Dröge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. 2005. Marketing and technology' resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3): 259276.10.1002/smj.45010.1002/smj.450Google Scholar
Su, B. F., Xie, E., & Li, Y. 2009. Organizational slack and firm performance during institutional transitions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1): 7591.10.1007/s10490-008-9101-810.1007/s10490-008-9101-8Google Scholar
Tsang, E. W. K., & Kwan, K. 1999. Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 759780.10.2307/259353Google Scholar
Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. 2005. Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1): 8094.10.1509/jmkg.69.1.80.55505Google Scholar
Wang, D., Su, Z. F., & Yang, D. 2011. Organizational culture and knowledge creation capability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3): 363373.10.1108/1367327111113738510.1108/13673271111137385Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171180.10.1002/smj.425005020710.1002/smj.4250050207Google Scholar
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 133.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.xGoogle Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185203.10.2307/4134351Google Scholar
Zhou, K. Z. 2006. Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3): 394402.10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.00610.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.006Google Scholar