Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:09:03.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Building a Knowledge-Driven Society: Scholar Participation and Governance in Large Public Works Projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Lihua Yang*
Affiliation:
Beihang University, China

Abstract

Previous studies have found no relationship between scholar participation and public project performance. Building on the work of Lindblom (1977; 1990), I propose a model depicting scholars' roles in social organizations and governance. A study of thirty-two cases of large public works projects in China and seventeen projects in thirteen other countries shows a moderately positive relationship. The study further shows the greatest influence on project success occurs when participating scholars serve as information brokers and entrepreneurial activity organizers. Successful scholar participation occurred through five working principles: (1) there is dispersed and specialized knowledge production; (2) there is dispersed and asymmetric knowledge possession; (3) knowledge-driven volitions and consensus are criteria for knowledge; (4) the satisfaction of diverse and heterogeneous individual needs is realized through knowledge-driven institutional arrangements; and (5) there are multiple methods of knowledge application. In general, scholar participation seems to be more effective in projects in which there is low political intervention, and in village and county projects. The results of the study provide a theoretical and empirical foundation for further research on scholar participation in social organizations.

Type
Special Issue Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refernces

Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4): 571582.Google Scholar
Avruch, K,, Black, P. W., & Scimecca, J. A. 1991. Conflict resolution: Cross-cultural perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. 2008. NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brusoni, B., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organization coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 597621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. 1992. bandeare in Australia: Taking the long vievo in tough times. Third Annual Report, National Soil Conservation Program, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Castro, P. 2010. Governance in combating desertification in Peru: The case of Apuritnac Region, Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Chang, C. 1955. The Chinese gentry: Studies on their role in nineteenth-centuty Chinese society. Washington: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, L. R., & Green, W. H. 1976. Economies of scale in US electric power generation source. The Journal of Political Economy, 84(4): 655676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornforth, C. 2003. The governance of public and nonprofit organisations: What do boards do? London; Routledge.Google Scholar
Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beers, M. C. 1998. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2): 4357.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1960. The division of labor in society. (Simpson, G., Trans.) New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Fiksel, J. 2006. Sustainability and resilience – toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy (SSPP), 2(2): 18.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambios 31(5): 437440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederickson, H. G., & Smith, K. B. 2003. The public administration theory primer. Boulder and Cumnor Hill: Westview Press.Google Scholar
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gordenker, L., & Weiss, T. G. 1995. NGO participation in the international policy process. Third World Quarterly, 16(3): 543556.Google Scholar
Grant, P. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375387.Google Scholar
Held, D., Megrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. 1999. Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. M., Mayrand, K., & Paquin, M. (Eds.). 2006. Governing global desertification, Aldershot Publishing Limited: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kekic, L. 2007. The economist intelligence unit's index of democracy. [Cited 22 October 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_INDEX_2007_v3.pdf Google Scholar
Kettl, D. F. 2000. The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance, Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-W. 2000. Territorial development policy – Spatial development. Paper presented at the OECD Korea Workshop on Territorial Policies and Issues, Seoul, March 2000.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. 1980. Scale economies, production differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5): 950959.Google Scholar
Li, D. X. 2005. A beach-goers in the sand sea – the story of Bao Ligao, a Deputy to the Second People's Congress of Tongliao City. People [Cited 11 January 2012.] Available from URL: http://npc.people.com.cn/GB/22217/3401208.html (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1977. Politics and markets: The -world's political economic systems. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1990. Inquiry and change: The trouble attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, L. E. Jr, Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. 2000. Studying governance and public management: Why? How? Heinrich, C.J. & Lynn, L. E. Jr. (Eds.), Governance and performance: New perspectives: 133. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. 2001. Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd cd.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Moench, M., Dixit, A., Janakarajan, S., Rathore, M. S., & Mudrakartha, S. 2003. Fluid mosaic: Water governance in the context of variability, uncertainty and change; a synthesis paper. Kathmandu: Nepal Water Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
Murray, J. D., & White, R. W. 1983. Economies of scale and economies of scope in multiproduct financial institutions: A study of British Columbia credit unions. The Journal of Finance, 38(3): 887902.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67: 297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, G. 2003. A board culture of corporate governance. Corporate Governance. International Journal) 6(3): 2230.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, J.-H. 1998. The Saemaul Movement: Korea's approach to rural modernization in the 1970s. Seoul: Korea Rural Economic Institute.Google Scholar
Plummer, K. 2001. Documents of Life 2: An invitation to a critical humanism. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Premfors, R. 1981. Charles Lindblom and Aaron Wildavsky. British Journal of Political Science, 11(2): 201225.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. K. 2000. Kerala's development achievements and their replicability. In Parayil, G. (Ed.), Kerala: The development experience reflections on sustainability and replicability: 88115. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. F., Smith, D. M. S., Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Mortimore, M., Batterbury, S. P. J., Downing, T. E., & Dowalatbadi, H. 2007. Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development. Science, 316(5826): 847851.Google Scholar
Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. 2003. Effective water governance. TEC background papers no. 7, Stockholm: Global Water Partnership.Google Scholar
Romer, P. 1987. Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2): 5662.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1945. Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Skuras, D., Dimara, E., & Vakrou, A. 2000. The day after grant-aid: Business development schemes for small rural firms in lagging areas of Greece. Small Business Economics, 14(2): 125136.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1965. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Stavrianos, L. S. 1998. A global history: From prehistory to 21st century (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Stringer, L. C., & Bauer, S. 2009. The role of science in the global governance of desertification. Journal of Environment & Development, 18(3): 248267.Google Scholar
Sun, R., & Buhe, C. L. 2000. Struggle for forestry – the story of Shan Li, Head of Baxiantong Forest in Naiman Banner. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry, 10: 3233. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Swyngedouw, E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11): 19912006.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. 2007. Community participation in the real world; Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies, 44(2): 297317.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the cntciprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(3): 223247.Google Scholar
Turner, J. E., Hesli, V. L., Bark, D. S., & Yu, H. 1993. Villages astir: Community development, tradition, and change in Korea. London: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
UNCCD (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification). 1994. Elaboration of an international convention to combat desertification in countries experiencing serious drought and/or desertification, particularly in Africa. (U.N. Doc. A/AC.241/27, 33 I.L.M. 1328). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). 2009. What is Good Governance? [Cited 2 February 2010.] Available from URL: http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/ govemancc.pdf Google Scholar
Wang, F., Yin, H., & Zhou, Z. 2012. The adoption of bottom-up governance in China's homeowner Associations. Management and Organization Review, 8(3): 559583.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. F. 2003. A surfing people in the sand sea – the story of Shan Li, Head of Baxiantong Forest. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry, 3: 4344. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
WCED, The U.N.'s World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1922. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 2007. Scale and scaling: A cross-disciplinary perspective. In Wu, J. & Hobbs, R. J. (Eds.), Key Topics in Landscape Ecology: 115142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xinhua News Agency. 2007. 18.7b Yuan earmarked to fight desertification in Xinjiang. Ministry of Environmental Protection the People's Republic of China. [Cited 22 May 2008.] Available from URL: http://english.sepa.gov.cn/News_service/media_news/200712/t20071217_114947.htm Google Scholar
Xu, W., & Wang, J. 2007. A people willing to contribute to ‘green’ – the story of Ji Li, Head of Xingongzhao Forest in Naiman Banner. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry, 12: 40 (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Yang, L. 2007a. Scholar-based governance: A fourth model to collective action. Chinese Public Administration, 259(1): 96103 (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Yang, L. 2007b. Building a multi-collaborative community governance system to resolve the dilemma of collective action – A framework of ‘product-institutional’ analysis (PIA). Journal of Public Management, 4(2): 623 (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Yang, L. 2009. Scholar-participated governance: combating desertification and other dilemmas of collective action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe, KL.Google Scholar
Yang, L. 2010. Scholar participated governance: Combating desertification and other dilemmas of collective action. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3): 672674.Google Scholar
Yang, L., & Lan, Z. 2010. Internet's impact on expertcitizen interactions in public policymaking – A meta analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 27: 431441.Google Scholar
Yang, L., & Wu, J. 2009. Scholar-participated governance as an alternative solution to the problem of collective action in social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics, 68: 24122425.Google Scholar
Yang, L., & Wu, J. 2010. Seven design principles for promoting scholars' participation in combating desertification. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 17(2): 109119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L., Lan, Z., & Wu, J. 2010. Roles of scholars in the practice of combating-desertification: A case study in northwest China. Environmental Management, 46(2): 154166.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar