Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:17:17.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-worker Mistreatment in a Singaporean Chinese Firm: The Roles of Third Party Embeddedness and Network Closure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Violet T. Ho*
Affiliation:
University of Richmond, USA

Abstract

This study integrates research on social networks and interpersonal counterproductive behaviours to examine the role of third party relationships in predicting an individual's susceptibility to co-worker mistreatment, and in moderating the relationship between co-worker mistreatment and job performance. Third party embeddedness and network closure are examined in the formal workflow network and the informal liking network. Results obtained from employees in a family-owned Chinese business in Singapore indicate that an individual is more likely to be mistreated by a co-worker when both parties are strongly embedded in mutual third party relationships in the workflow network, and that the individual is less likely to be mistreated when both parties are strongly embedded in the liking network. At the individual network level, network closure (i.e., the extent to which an individual's contacts are themselves connected to one another) in the workflow network increases the likelihood that a co-worker will mistreat the individual, but closure in the liking network weakens the negative relationship between mistreatment and performance. The findings offer a network-based perspective to understanding interpersonal mistreatment and counterproductive work behaviours, particularly in the context of Confucian Asian firms, and provide practical implications for organizations and individuals to reduce counterproductive behaviours at work.

本研究整合社会网络和人际反生产行为的研究, 探讨第三方关系在预测个人被同事虐待的程度中的作用, 也探讨第三方关系对于同事虐待和工作业绩之间关系的调节作用。 研究探讨了正式的工作流程网络和非正式的喜欢网络中的第三方嵌入性和网络闭合。 针对新加坡的一家华人家族企业的员工的研究显示, 当双方强烈地嵌入到工作流程网络中的第三方相互关系中时, 个人更可能被同事虐待; 当双方强烈地嵌入在喜欢网络中时, 个人更不可能被同事虐待。 在个人网络的层次上, 工作流程网络中的网络闭合(即, 个人的交往对象之间相互联结的程度) 增加个人被同事虐待的可能性, 但喜欢网络中的闭合减弱虐待与工作业绩之间的关系。 这些研究发现提供了一个基于网络的视角, 来理解人际虐待和反生产工作行为、 特别是在儒家文化的亚洲公司的情境下的人际虐待和反生产工作行为, 同时也对组织和个人减少工作中的反生产行为具有实践意义。

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H. 1995. Statistic power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21(6): 11411158.Google Scholar
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. 1999. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 452471.Google Scholar
Aquino, K. 2000. Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26(2): 171193.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. 2004. A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6): 10231034.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. 2009. Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 717741.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M., & Allen, D. G. 1999. The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3): 260272.Google Scholar
Aryee, S., Sun, L., Chen, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. 2008. Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 393411.Google Scholar
Batjargal, B. 2007. Comparative social capital: Networks of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in China and Russia. Management and Organization Review, 3(3): 397419.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. 2006. Workplace harrassment from the victim's perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5): 9981012.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J. 1981. Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3): 331348.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4): 518539.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Butterfield, J. D.? & Skaggs, B. C. 1998. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1): 1431.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1982. Toward a structural theory of action. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2): 339365.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. In Sutton, R. I. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 22: 345423. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2007. Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 119148.Google Scholar
Burl, R. S. 2010. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buskens, V. 2002. Social networks and trust. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Buskens, V., & Raub, W. 2002. Embedded trust: Control and learning. Advances in Group Processes, 19: 167202.Google Scholar
Chai, S.-K., & Rhee, M. 2010. Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., & House, R. J. 2007. Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.Google Scholar
Chua, R. Y. J., Morris, M. W., & Ingram, P. 2009. Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs. American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3): 490508.Google Scholar
Cobb, E. P. 2012. Bullying, violence, harassment, discrimination and stress: Emerging workplace health and safety issue. Boston, MA: The Isosceles Group.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S., & Aiken, L. S. 2002. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. 1985. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2): 310357.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.): S95S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, M. K. 2009. Preventing workplace mobbing and bullying with effective organizational consultation, policies, and legislation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61(3): 242262.Google Scholar
Duffy, M. K. J. Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. 2002. Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2): 331351.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S. 2000. Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 5(4): 371401.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1): 3141.Google Scholar
Ferrin, D. L., Dirks, K. T., & Shah, P. P. 2006. Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4): 870883.Google Scholar
Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. 1999. A model of work frustration-aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6): 915931.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3): 215239.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. 2006. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1): 8496.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481510.Google Scholar
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. 2007. An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3): 252263.Google Scholar
Heider, F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S. 2011. ‘Incivility, social undermining, bullying … Oh my!’: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3): 499519.Google Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. 2010. Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1): 2444.Google Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., LeBlanc, M. M., & Sivanathan, N. 2007. Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1): 228238.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. 1989. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3): 513524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
House, R.J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Gupta, V., & Associates. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ibarra, H., & Smith-Lovin, L. 1997. New directions in social network research on gender and organizational careers. In Cooper, C. L. & Jackson, S. E. (Eds.), Creating tomorrow's organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior: 359384. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Janicik, G. A., & Larrick, R. P. 2005. Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2): 348364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krackhardt, D. 1988a. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4): 359381.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. 1988b. Simmelian tie: Super strong and sticky. In Kramer, R. & Neale, M. (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations: 2138. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. 1999. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. In Andrews, S. B. & Knocke, D. (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations. Vol. 16: 183210. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Labianca, G., & Brass, D. J. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 596614.Google Scholar
Lim, J. J. C. 2011. A cross-cultural comparison and examination of workplace bullying in Singapore and the United States. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Houston, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. 1979. Work and friendship tics in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(1): 181199.Google Scholar
Loh, J., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. 2010. Consequences of workplace bullying on employee identification and satisfaction among Australians and Singaporeans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(2): 236252.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. 1990. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 435463.Google Scholar
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. 2001. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1): 121146.Google Scholar
Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. 1998. Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred tmgets. Journal of Management, 24(3): 391419.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. 1997. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5): 673693.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879903.Google Scholar
Porath, C., & Erez, A. 2007. Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 11811197.Google Scholar
Raub, W., & Weesie, J. 1990. Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 626654.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R.J. 1997. Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestations, and its causes. In Lewicki, R.J., Sheppard, B. H. & Bies, R.J. (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations: 327. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Sasovova, Z., Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., & Schippers, M. C. 2010. Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4): 639670.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. 1950. The sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Song, F., Cadsby, C. B., & Bi, Y. 2011. Trust, reciprocity, and guanxi in China: An experimental investigation. Management and Organization Review, 8(2): 397421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 316325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. 2005. Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. 1991. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1): 6785.Google Scholar
Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. 2010. Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1): 167181.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A. III. 1989. Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 402423.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. 2007. Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 426478.Google Scholar
Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. 2007. Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4): 952966.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L., & the APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. 1999. Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8): 594604.Google Scholar
Workplace Bullying Institute. 2012. Results of the 2010 and 2007 WBI U.S. workplace bullying survey. [Cited 28 September 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.workplacebullying.org/wbiresearch/2010-wbi-national-survey/ Google Scholar
Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 131.Google Scholar
Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. 2003. Empirical findings on bullying. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: InternationaI perspectives in research and practice: 103126. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar