Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:23:09.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historical and Cultural Obstacles to Frame-Breaking Innovations in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Shyhnan Liou ,
Letty Yan-Yee Kwan  and
Chi-Yue Chiu
Shyhnan Liou
Affiliation:
National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Letty Yan-Yee Kwan
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Chi-Yue Chiu*
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
*
Corresponding author: Chi-Yue Chiu (cychiu@cuhk.edu.hk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

China, which was once a world champion in invention, has failed to maintain its global leadership in innovation after the middle of the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644). Today, frame-breaking innovations are more likely to originate from European and North American countries than from China. In the perspective article (Augier, Guo, & Rowen, 2016), the authors attribute this phenomenon, which is often referred to as the Needham Puzzle, to three reasons: (1) the Chinese did not develop a scientific method like that in the West; (2) lack of educational diversity and structural inertia in China; and (3) lack of openness to the outside world. The authors also attribute the US's leadership in innovation to its culture of encouraging experimentation, tolerating failure and accepting deviance, and to its institutional support for decentralization of and competition in R&D and basic research. This commentary aims to enrich this insightful analysis. We focus on (1) the reasons for the demise of Chinese leadership in science and technology since the middle of the Ming dynasty, and (2) the historical and cultural obstacles to the development of frame-breaking innovations in modern China.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 35 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Augier, M., Guo, J., & Rowen, H. 2016. The Needham puzzle reconsidered: Organizations, organizing, and innovation in China. Management and Organization Review, 12 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Chiu, C-y., Roese, N. J., Tam, K-P., & Lau, I. Y.-M. 2006. Culture and counterfactuals: On the importance of life domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37 (1): 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C-y., Kwan, L. Y-y., & Liou, S. 2016. The institutional and cultural contexts of creativity and innovation in China. In Lewin, A., Murmann, J. P., & Kenny, M. (Eds.), Building innovation capacity in China: An agenda for the middle income trap. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. 2003. Later Mohist logic, ethics and science. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, R. 1982. 1587: A year of no significance: The Ming Dynasty in decline. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, L. Y-y., & Chiu, C-y. 2015. Country variations in different innovation outputs: The interactive effects of institutional support and human capital. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36 (7): 1050–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, A. K-y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C-y. 2008. Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63 (3): 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, J., & Mueller, J. (in press). Implicit theories of creative ideas: How culture guides creativity assessments. Academy of Management Discovery.Google Scholar
Roos, P., Gelfand, M., Nau, D., & Lun, J. 2015. Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129 (C): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. 2011. Infectious disease and the creation of culture. In Gelfand, M., Chiu, C-y., & Hong, Y-y. (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 99–151). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K., & Ting, S-S. 2010. Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historimetry. Management and Organization Review, 6 (3): 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabellini, G. 2008. Institutions and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6: 255–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. B. 1994. Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27 (1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C-y., & Stark, S. E. 2014. Openness to experience: Its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96 (1): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, X. B. 2006. Global production and derivative creation. Beijing: China Machine.Google Scholar