Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-qls9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-01T06:41:14.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Social Media Empowers Stakeholders: A Stakeholder Multiplicity Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2025

Meng Zhao
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Seung Ho Park
Affiliation:
The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong,
Lingli Luo*
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, China
*
Corresponding author: Lingli Luo (lingliluo@intl.zju.edu.cn)

Abstract

The literature shows that social media enhances individual stakeholders’ ability to directly influence firm behaviors, paying less attention to how it enables different stakeholder groups to influence firms collectively. Drawing on the stakeholder multiplicity perspective in stakeholder theory, this study theorizes and empirically demonstrates that social media can empower lower-salience stakeholders to drive the actions of higher-salience stakeholders to influence firm behaviors. By analyzing 506 consumer crises involving foreign and local companies in China from 2000 to 2020, we find that firms take more substantial responsibility when confronted with consumers’ social-media-based collective actions than when confronted with conventional channels of consumer complaints. This heightened responsibility stems mainly from collective actions’ tendency to spur law-enforcing agencies into addressing alleged firm misdeeds, demonstrating a stakeholder multiplicity effect of social media empowerment. We also identify the institutional contingency of this effect, showing that local governments’ bureaucratic capacity positively moderates collective actions’ effect on law-enforcing actions, whereas their intervention in firms’ operational decisions negatively moderates law-enforcing actions’ effect on firms’ responsibility assumption. This study extends the understanding of social media's relationship with stakeholder influence and consolidates the stakeholder multiplicity perspective in stakeholder theory.

摘要

摘要

文献表明,社交媒体能够增强个体利益相关方直接影响企业行为的能力,但较少关注社交媒体如何促使不同利益相关方群体共同影响企业行为。基于利益相关方理论中的“多元性视角”,本研究从理论和实证角度阐明了社交媒体能够赋权低显著性利益相关方,使其推动高显著性利益相关方采取行动,从而影响企业行为。通过分析 2000 年至 2020 年间涉及中国本土和外资企业的 506 起消费者危机事件,本文发现,与传统的消费者投诉渠道相比,当企业面对消费者基于社交媒体的集体行动时,会承担更多责任。这是因为基于社交媒体的集体行动更容易推动执法机构调查处理消费者所声称的企业不当行为。这说明了社交媒体赋权的“利益相关方多元性效应”。本文还识别了这一效应的制度促进因素和制约因素:地方政府的行政管理能力正向调节了基于社交媒体的集体行动对执法行为的影响,而地方政府对企业经营的干预程度则负向调节了执法行为对企业承担责任的影响。本研究扩展了对社交媒体与利益相关方影响之间关系的理解,并丰富和巩固了利益相关方理论中的多元性视角。

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. 2011. Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32(12): 13311355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 507525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. 2015. Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 483573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lui, S. S. Y. 2000. Navigating China's changing economy: Strategies for private firms. Business Horizons, 43(1): 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, C., Lu, J., & Tao, Z. 2006. The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: Empirical evidence from China. American Economic Review, 96(2): 353357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. 1997. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18: 93117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. 2020. Beyond good intentions: Designing CSR initiatives for greater social impact. Journal of Management, 46(6): 937964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D. P., & Diermeier, D. 2007. Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3): 599634.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 11731182.Google ScholarPubMed
Bascle, G. 2008. Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 6(3): 285327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, M. K., Boivie, S., & Prince, N. R. 2013. Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organization Science, 24(3): 910925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W. L. 1997. Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2): 177–I86.Google Scholar
Berthon, P., Pitt, L., Plangger, K., & Shapiro, D. 2012. Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: Implications for international marketing strategy. Business Horizons, 55(3): 261271.Google Scholar
Blanchard, B. 2008. China milk scandal firm asked for cover-up help. [Accessed 30 January 2024]. Available from URL: http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/10/01/us-China-milk-idUSTRE48T0L920081001Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. 1980. Rent seeking and profit seeking. In Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., & Tullock, G. (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society: 315. College Station, TX: A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Bundy, J., & Pfarrer, M. D. 2015. A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Academy of Management Review, 40(3): 345369.Google Scholar
Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2013. Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3): 352376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Y. 2004. Managed participation in China. Political Science Quarterly, 119(3): 425451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. L., & Lindberg, L. N. 1990. Property rights and the organization of economic activity by the state. American Sociological Review, 55(5): 634647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, V. 2002. Technology and counterhegemonic movements: The case of Nike corporation. Social Movement Studies, 1(2): 129146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D. H., Jiang, D. W., Liang, S. K., & Wang, F. P. 2011. Selective enforcement of regulation. China Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1–2): 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., & Lu, Y. 1996. Institutional constraints on economic reform: The case of investment decisions in China. Organization Science, 7(1): 6077.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. T. 1995. Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the ‘appropriate’ crisis response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(4): 447476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, W. T. 1998. The internet as potential equalizer: New leverage for confronting social irresponsibility. Public Relations Review, 24(3): 289303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, W. T. 2004. Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights from situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Communication, 41(3): 265289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, W. T. 2007. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10: 163176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. 2004. Reasoned action in crisis communication: An attribution theory based approach to crisis management. In Millar, D. P. & Heath, R. L. (Eds.), Responding to crises: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication: 95116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. 2012. The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review, 38(3): 408415.Google Scholar
Davis, D. S. 2006. Urban Chinese homeowners as citizen-consumers. In Garon, S. & Maclachlan, P. (Eds.), The ambivalent consumer: Questioning consumption in east Asia and the West: 281–300. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. 2002. The corporate governance role of the media. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Dyck, A., Volchkova, N., & Zingales, L. 2008. The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. The Journal of Finance, 63(3): 10931135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. 2011. Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. 2006. Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8): 765781.Google Scholar
Eickelman, D. F., & Anderson, J. W. 2003. New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Etter, M., & Albu, O. B. 2021. Activists in the dark: Social media algorithms and collective action in two social movement organizations. Organization, 28(1): 6891.Google Scholar
Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. 2017. Social media and the formation of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Review, 44(1): 2852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman/Ballinger.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. J. 2005. Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business Society, 44(3): 331.Google Scholar
Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., & Meiners, R. E. 1982. Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? Academy of Management Journal, 25(March): 94106.Google Scholar
Fu, D. 2017. Disguised collective action in China. Comparative Political Studies, 50(4): 499527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, M. 2017. Authoritarian legality: Law, workers, and the state in contemporary China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganesh, S., & Stohl, C. 2013. From Wall Street to Wellington: Protests in an era of digital ubiquity. Communication Monographs, 80(4): 425–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Y. 2011. Government intervention, perceived benefit, and bribery of firms in transitional China. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2): 175184.Google Scholar
George, J. J., & Leidner, D. E. 2019. From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization, 29(3): 100129.Google Scholar
Gregoire, Y., Salle, A., & Tripp, T. M. 2015. Managing social media crises with your consumers: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 58(2): 173182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 718.Google Scholar
Harvey, B., & Schaefer, A. 2001. Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of UK water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3): 243260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, J., & Schankerman, M. 2000. Intervention, corruption, and capture: The nexus between enterprises and state. Economics of Transition, 8(3): 325368.Google Scholar
Hersher, R. 2017. Key moments in the Dakota Access pipeline fight. [Accessed 14 June 2024]. Available from URL: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/22/514988040/key-moments-in-the-dakota-access-pipeline-fightGoogle Scholar
Hiatt, S. R., Grandy, J. B., & Lee, B. H. 2015. Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and U.S. oil and gas firms. Organization Science, 26(6): 17691786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. Z., & Yang, D. L. 2002. Bureaucratic capacity and state-society relations in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 7(1): 1946.Google Scholar
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2012. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9): 834864.Google Scholar
Jurgens, M., Berthon, P., Edelman, L., & Pitt, L. 2016. Social media revolutions: The influence of secondary stakeholders. Business Horizons, 59(2): 129136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, K. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1): 5968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H., Kim, M., & Qian, C. 2018. Effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A competitive-action perspective. Journal of Management, 44(3): 10971118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, B. G. 2008a. A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3): 395421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, B. G. 2008b. A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1): 2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. 2017. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review, 111(03): 484501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojima, K., Choe, Y. J., Ohtomo, T., & Tsujinaka, Y. 2012. The corporatist system and social organizations in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(3): 609628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 6481.Google Scholar
Li, S. H. G., & Zhou, G. Y. 2012. The problems of China's consumer protection law in legal practice. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(14): 6572.Google Scholar
Liu, R., Pieniak, Z., & Verbeke, W. 2013. Consumers’ attitudes and behavior toward safe food in China: A review. Food Control, 33(1): 93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, N. N., Lo, C. W. H., Zhan, X., & Wang, W. 2015. Campaign-style enforcement and regulatory compliance. Public Administration Review, 75(1): 8595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Zhang, J., & Marquis, C. 2016. Mobilization in the internet age: Internet activism and corporate response. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6): 20452068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X., Tong, T. W., & Fitza, M. 2013. How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1): 6687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manion, M. 2004. Corruption by design: Building clean government in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., & Bird, Y. 2018. The paradox of responsive authoritarianism: How civic activism spurs environmental penalties in China. Organization Science, 29(5): 948968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 404424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, J. E., Post, J. E., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. 2004. Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Academy of Management Review, 29(3): 520523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. 2005. Foreign investment strategies and subnational institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 6393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. S. 2006. The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5): 10011033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what truly counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garces-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. 2008. Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11): 12251240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. 2006. Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4): 377391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, B. A., Bellm, S. J., & Whitwell, G. 2004. Stakeholder salience revisited: Toward an actionable tool for the management of stakeholders. The Academy of Management Conference 2004 Best Paper Proceedings.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2): 175220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obar, J., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. 2012. Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, 2: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odziemkowska, K., & Henisz, W. J. 2021. Webs of influence: Secondary stakeholder actions and cross-national corporate social performance. Organization Science, 32(1): 233255.Google Scholar
Olukotun, A. 2002. Authoritarian state, crisis of democratization and the underground media in Nigeria. African Affairs, 101(404): 317342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overby, A. B. 2006. Consumer protection in China after accession to the WTO. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 33(2): 347392.Google Scholar
Parent, M., Plangger, K., & Bal, A. 2011. The new WTP: Willingness to participate. Business Horizons, 54(3): 219229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. 2008. After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 730749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfarrer, M. D., Smith, K., Bartol, K., Khanin, D., & Zhang, X. 2008. Coming forward: The effects of social and regulatory forces on the voluntary restatement of earnings subsequent to wrongdoing. Organization Science, 19(3): 386403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Pitt, L. F., Berthon, P. R., Watson, R. T., & Zinkhan, G. M. 2002. The Internet and the birth of real consumer power. Business Horizons, 45(4): 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. 2002. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1): 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanyal, R. 2005. Determinants of bribery in international business: The cultural and economic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 59: 139145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, L. C., & Kozinets, R. 2011. Beyond enemy lines: Sociality in consumer activism. Advances in Consumer Research, 39: 398403.Google Scholar
Shaver, J. M. 2005. Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. Journal of Management, 31(3): 330353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T., & Finegold, K. 1982. State capacity and economic intervention in the early new deal. Political Science Quarterly, 97(2): 255278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, R. 2008, December 2. China reveals 300,000 children were made ill by tainted milk. Available from URL: telegraph.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. P. 2009. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 5th ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. 2004. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tai, Z. X. 2018. Social media and contentious action in China. In Meikle, G. (Ed.), The Routledge companion to media and activism: 97–107. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tan, J. 2009. Institutional structure and firm social performance in transitional economies: Evidence of multinational corporations in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 86: 171189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. 2018. Analyzing the notion of ‘consumer’ in China's consumer protection law. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 6(2): 294318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2): 447504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooij, B., & Lo, C. W. H. 2010. Fragile convergence: Understanding variation in the enforcement of China's industrial pollution law. Law Policy, 32(1): 1437.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N. 1989. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3): 423444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, L. R., Cooley, S. C., & Nicholson, J. 2012. A great day for oiled pelicans: BP, Twitter, and the Deep Water Horizon crisis response. Paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual International Public Relations Research Conference.Google Scholar
Wang, X. L., Hu, P., & Fan, G. 2021. NERI Index of Marketization of China's Provinces 2021 report. Beijing: Economic Science Press.Google Scholar
Wei, D. 2018. Enforcement and effectiveness of consumer law in the People's Republic of China. In Micklitz, H. W. & Saumier, G. (Eds.), Enforcement and effectiveness of consumer law. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 27. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Wei, J. C., Ouyang, Z., & Chen, H. P. 2017. Well known or well liked? The effects of Management and organization review corporate reputation on firm value at the onset of a corporate crisis. Strategic Management Journal, 38(10): 21032120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welford, R. 2005. Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17: 3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. Y., & Davidson, D. K. 2011. The business-government-society relationship: A comparison between China and the US. Journal of Management Development, 30(1): 112125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z. Y., & Salomon, R. 2017. Deconstructing the liability of foreignness: Regulatory enforcement actions against foreign banks. Journal of International Business Studies, 48: 837861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xinhua Agency. 2008. The Sanlu milk powder incident highlights the urgent need for a complete transformation of government functions. [Accessed 14 June 2024]. Available from URL: https://news.ifeng.com/c/7fYTjnpXWpsGoogle Scholar
Xu, N. 2012. A decade of food safety in China, China Dialog. [Accessed 30 January 2024]. Available from URL: https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5083Google Scholar
Yang, G. B. 2013. Contesting food safety in the Chinese media: Between hegemony and counterhegemony. The China Quarterly, 214: 337355.Google Scholar
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 38(2): 341363.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. J., & Luo, X. W. 2013. Dared to care: Organizational vulnerability, institutional logics, and MNCs’ social responsiveness in emerging markets. Organization Science, 24(6): 17421764.Google Scholar
Zhao, M. 2013. Beyond cops and robbers: Contextual challenge driving multinational corporation's public crisis in China and Russia. Business Horizons, 56(4): 491501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M., Tan, J., & Park, S. 2014. From voids to sophistication: Institutional environment and MNC CSR crisis in emerging markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4): 655674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M., Ma, X., Park, S. H., & Luo, L. 2023. Attention-based constraint to MNC coevolution in China's changing stakeholder environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(4): 797814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. 2017. State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2): 375404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zietsma, C., & Winn, M. I. 2008. Building chains and directing flows: Strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts. Business & Society, 47(1): 68101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar