Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:12:40.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market Orientation, Growth Strategy, and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of External Connections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

Igor Filatotchev ,
Zhongfeng Su  and
Garry D. Bruton
Igor Filatotchev
Affiliation:
City University of London, UK Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria
Zhongfeng Su*
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Garry D. Bruton
Affiliation:
Texas Christian University, USA Sun Yat-sen University, China
*
Corresponding author: Zhongfeng Su (zhongfengsu@163.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the mediating effect of growth strategy (including market and product expansion strategies) on the linkage of market orientation (MO) to firm performance and the moderating effects of a firm's external connections (including political and business ties) on the relationship between MO and growth strategy. It finds that both market and product expansion strategies are key conduits through which MO improves firm performance. In addition, the relationship between MO and market expansion strategy is positively moderated by political ties but negatively moderated by business ties, while the linkage of MO to product expansion strategy is moderated negatively by political ties but positively by business ties. By combining mediating and moderating effects in a framework that integrates MO, growth strategy, external connections, and firm performance, this study enriches our knowledge on the implications of MO and provides insight into factors that facilitate firm growth.

摘要:

摘要:

本研究调查了增长策略 (包括市场和产品拓展策略) 对市场导向 (MO) 与公司绩效的关联的调解效应, 以及公司外部关系 (包括政治和商务关系) 对MO和增长策略之间关系的调节效应。它发现市场和产品扩张策略是MO提高企业绩效的关键管道。另外, MO与市场拓展策略之间的关系受政治关系的积极调节但受商务关系的消极调节, 而MO与产品拓展策略的关联却受政治关系的消极调节但受商务关系的积极调节。通过结合在整合MO、增长策略、外部关系和公司绩效的框架里的调解和调节效应, 本研究丰富了我们关于MO的启示的知识, 并提供了对有助于公司成长的因素的见解。

इस शोध में फर्म के बाज़ार अनुकूलन के फर्म प्रदर्शन से सम्बन्ध पर विकास रणनीति (बाज़ार एवं उत्पाद विस्तार) मध्यस्थता के प्रभाव और बाह्य संबंधों (रणनैतिक और कारोबारी बंधन) के नियंत्रक प्रभाव का अध्ययन किया गया है. इस अध्ययन में पाया गया की बाज़ार व उत्पाद विस्तार रणनीतियां वो महत्त्वपूर्ण कड़ी हैं जिससे बाज़ार अनुकूलन फर्म प्रदर्शन बेहतर करता है. साथ ही बाज़ार अनुकूलन व बाज़ार विकास रणनीति के सन्दर्भ में राजनैतिक सम्बन्ध सकारात्मक नियंत्रक हैं लेकिन कारोबारी सम्बन्ध नकारात्मक नियंत्रक हैं. वहीं बाजार अनुकूलन व उत्पाद विस्तार रणनीति के संबंधों पर राजनैतिक संबंधों का नकारात्मक नियंत्रक प्रभाव है और कारोबारी संबंधों का सकारात्मक नियंत्रक प्रभाव है. यह शोध बाज़ार अनुकूलन, विकास रणनीति, बाह्य सम्बन्ध व फर्म प्रदर्शन की समग्र संरचना पर मध्यस्थ व नियंत्रक प्रभावों को जोड़ते हुए हमारी बाज़ार अनुकूलन की समझ को संवर्धित करता है और फर्म के विकास के कारकों पर प्रकाश डालता है.

Sumário:

Sumário:

Este estudo examina o efeito mediador da estratégia de crescimento (incluindo as estratégias de expansão de mercado e de produto) sobre a conexão entre orientação de mercado (MO) e desempenho da empresa, e os efeitos moderadores das ligações externas da empresa (incluindo as conexões políticas e empresariais) na relação entre MO e estratégia de crescimento.

Ele descobre que ambas as estratégias de expansão de mercado e produto são condutores chave através dos quais MO melhora o desempenho da empresa. Além disso, a relação entre MO e a estratégia de expansão do mercado é positivamente moderada pelas conexões políticas, mas negativamente moderada pelos laços comerciais, enquanto a ligação entre MO e estratégia de expansão do produto é moderada negativamente pelas conexões políticas, mas positivamente por laços comerciais. Através da combinação de efeitos mediadores e moderadores em um modelo que integra MO, estratégia de crescimento, conexões externas e desempenho da empresa, este estudo enriquece nosso conhecimento sobre as implicações da MO e fornece uma visão sobre os fatores que facilitam o crescimento da empresa.

Аннотация:

АННОТАЦИЯ:

Данная работа рассматривает опосредованное влияние стратегии роста (в том числе стратегий расширения рынка и товарного ассортимента) на взаимосвязь рыночной ориентации и производительности компании, а также непосредственное воздействие внешних связей компании (в том числе политических и деловых связей) на взаимоотношение между рыночной ориентацией и стратегией роста. Делается вывод о том, что стратегии расширения рынка и товарного ассортимента являются ключевыми каналами, через которые рыночная ориентация улучшает производительность компании. Кроме того, взаимосвязь между рыночной ориентацией и стратегией расширения рынка положительно соотносится с политическими связями, но отрицательно соотносится с деловыми связями; в то время как взаимосвязь между рыночной ориентацией и стратегией расширения товарного ассортимента отрицательно соотносится с политическими связями, но положительно с деловыми связями. Объединяя опосредованные и непосредственные факторы воздействия в рамках одной модели, которая включает в себя рыночную ориентацию, стратегию роста, внешние связи и производительность компании, это исследование обогащает наши знания о результатах рыночной ориентации и дает представление о факторах, которые способствуют росту компании.

Resumen:

RESUMEN:

Este estudio examina el efecto mediador de la estrategia de crecimiento (incluyendo las estrategias de expansión de mercado y de producto) en el vínculo entre la orientación al mercado (OM) con el desempeño empresarial y los efectos moderadores de las conexiones externas de una empresa (incluyendo los lazos políticos y de negocio) en la relación entre la orientación al mercado y la estrategia de crecimiento. Se encuentra que ambas estrategias de expansión de producto y de mercado son conductos clave mediante los cuales la orientación al mercado mejora el desempeño empresarial. Combinando los efectos mediadores y moderadores en un marco que integra la orientación al mercado, la estrategia de crecimiento, las conexiones externas, y el desempeño empresarial, este estudio enriquece nuestro conocimiento sobre las implicaciones de la orientación al mercado y da una nueva comprensión de los factores que facilitan el crecimiento de la empresa.

Keywords

business tiesfirm performancemarket expansion strategymarket orientationpolitical tiesproduct expansion strategy商务关系公司绩效市场拓展策略市场导向政治关系产品拓展策略कारोबारी सम्बन्धफर्म प्रदर्शनबाज़ार विस्तार रणनीतिबाज़ार अनुकूलनराजनैतिक सम्बन्धउत्पाद विस्तार रणनीतिconexões empresariaisdesempenho empresarialestratégia de expansão de mercadoorientação ao mercadoconexões políticasestratégia de expansão de produtoделовые связипроизводительность компаниистратегия расширения рынкарыночная ориентацияполитические связистратегия расширения товарного ассортиментаVínculos empresarialesdesempeño empresarialestrategia de expansión de mercadoorientación al mercadolazos políticosestrategia de expansión de producto
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 575 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abell, D. F. 1980. Defining the business: The starting point of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411–423.Google Scholar
Ansoff, I. H. 1965. Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–402.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99–120.Google Scholar
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Bhuian, S. N. 1997. Exploring market orientation in banks: An empirical examination in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Services Marketing, 11 (5): 317–328.Google Scholar
Bock, A. J., Opsahl, T., George, G., & Gann, D. M. 2012. The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexibility during business model innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (2): 279–462.Google Scholar
Cano, C. R., Carrillat, F. A., & Jaramillo, F. 2004. A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: Evidence from five continents. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (2): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. Jr. 1990. Scale and scope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, S., Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. 2010. Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2): 178–184.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1971. Test validation. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Deng, P. 2009. Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44 (1): 74–84.Google Scholar
Ellis, P. D. 2006. Market orientation and performance: A meta-analysis and cross-national comparisons. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (5): 1089–1107.Google Scholar
Finkle, T. A. 1998. The relationship between boards of directors and initial public offering in the biotechnology industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22 (3): 5–29.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.Google Scholar
Gao, S., Xu, K., & Yang, J. 2008. Managerial ties, absorptive capacity, and innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25 (3): 395–412.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S., & Sherry, J. F. Jr. 2006. Creating a market orientation: A longitudinal, multiform, grounded analysis of cultural transformation. Journal of Marketing, 70 (4): 37–55.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481–510.Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49 (2): 149–164.Google Scholar
He, X., Brouthers, K. D., & Filatotchev, I. 2013. Resource-based and institutional perspectives on export channel selection and export performance. Journal of Management, 39 (1): 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Y., & Tian, Z. 2008. Government-oriented corporate public relation strategies in transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 4 (3): 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, G. T. M., & Ketchen, D. J. Jr. 2001. Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (9): 899–906.Google Scholar
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J. Jr., & Slater, S. F. 2005. Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (12): 1173–1181.Google Scholar
Im, S., & Workman, J. P. 2004. Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68 (2): 114–132.Google Scholar
Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57 (3): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketchen, D. J. Jr., Hult, T. G. M., & Slater, S. F. 2007. Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (9): 961–964.Google Scholar
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. 2005. Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69 (2): 24–41.Google Scholar
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2): 1–18.Google Scholar
Kotler, P. 2002. Marketing management (11th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. 2011. Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75 (1): 16–30.Google Scholar
Levitt, T. 1975. Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 53 (5): 26–44.Google Scholar
Li, H., & Zhang, Y. 2007. The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China's transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (8): 791–804.Google Scholar
Li, J. J., & Zhou, K. Z. 2010. How foreign firms achieve competitive advantage in the Chinese emerging economy: Managerial ties and market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 63 (8): 856–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Su, Z., & Liu, Y. 2010. Can strategic flexibility help firms profit from product innovation? Technovation, 30 (5–6): 300–309.Google Scholar
Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Girma, S. 2011. Organic and acquisitive growth: Re-examining, testing and extending Penrose's growth theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (1): 48–74.Google Scholar
Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2013. Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta- analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 139–172.Google Scholar
McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J. 2010. Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (2): 261–288.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. W. 2008. China's second economic transition: Building national markets. Management and Organization Review, 4 (1): 3–15.Google Scholar
Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. 2004. Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (12): 1179–1197.Google Scholar
Murray, J. Y., Gao, G. Y., & Kotabe, M. 2011. Market orientation and performance of export ventures: The process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2): 252–269.Google Scholar
Murray, J. Y., Gao, G. Y., Kotabe, M., & Zhou, N. 2007. Assessing measurement invariance of export market orientation: A study of Chinese and non-Chinese firms in China. Journal of International Marketing, 15 (4): 41–62.Google Scholar
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. 1990. The effect of market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4): 20–35.Google Scholar
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. 1985. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Homewood: Richard, Irwin.Google Scholar
Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. 2008. The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2): 496–520.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (5): 455–477.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 486–501.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4): 531–544.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879–903.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 887–910.Google Scholar
Sandvik, I. L., & Sandvik, K. 2003. The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20 (4): 355–376.Google Scholar
Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. 2011. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. 1979. Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86 (2): 420–428.Google Scholar
Shu, C., Page, A. L., Gao, S., & Jiang, X. 2012. Managerial ties and firm innovation: Is knowledge creation a missing link? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (1): 125–143.Google Scholar
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1994. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 46–55.Google Scholar
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1998. Market-oriented and customer-led: Let's not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (10): 1001–1106.Google Scholar
Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13 (1982): 290–312.Google Scholar
Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. 2005. Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (3): 259–276.Google Scholar
Su, Y., Tsang, E. W. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. How do internal capabilities and external partnership affect innovativeness? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (2): 309–331.Google Scholar
Su, Z., Peng, J., Shen, H., & Xiao, T. 2013. Technological capability, marketing capability, and firm performance under turbulence conditions. Management and Organization Review, 9 (1): 115–137.Google Scholar
Su, Z., Xie, E., & Wang, D. 2015. Entrepreneurial orientation, managerial networking, and new venture performance in China. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (1): 228–248.Google Scholar
Wei, L., & Lau, C. M. 2008. The impact of market orientation and strategic HRM on firm performance: The case of Chinese enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (6): 980–995.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 2011. Asymmetric roles of business ties and political ties in product innovation. Journal of Business Research, 64 (11): 1151–1156.Google Scholar
Wu, W. 2008. Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: The mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (1): 122–146.Google Scholar
Zhou, K. Z. 2006. Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35 (3): 394–402.Google Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., Kin, Y. C., & Tse, D. K. 2005. The effects of strategic orientations in technology- and market-based breakthrough innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69 (2): 42–60.Google Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., Li, J. J., Zhou, N., & Su, C. 2008. Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: Evidence from China. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (9): 985–1000.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Filatotchev et al supplementary material

Filatotchev et al supplementary material 1

Download Filatotchev et al supplementary material(File)
File 13.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Filatotchev et al supplementary material

Filatotchev et al supplementary material 2

Download Filatotchev et al supplementary material(File)
File 13.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Filatotchev et al supplementary material

Filatotchev et al supplementary material 3

Download Filatotchev et al supplementary material(File)
File 29 KB
Supplementary material: File

Filatotchev et al supplementary material

Filatotchev et al supplementary material 4

Download Filatotchev et al supplementary material(File)
File 13.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Filatotchev et al supplementary material

Filatotchev et al supplementary material 5

Download Filatotchev et al supplementary material(File)
File 14.3 KB