We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
Footnotes
Accepted by Editor-in-Chief Arie Y. Lewin
References
REFERENCES
Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Debrah, Y. A.2016. Toward a construct of liability of origin. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(2): 211–231.Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S.2000. Going global: Lessons from late movers. Harvard Business Review, 78(2): 132–142.Google Scholar
Kolk, A., & Curran, L.2017. Contesting a place in the sun: On ideologies in foreign markets and liabilities of origin. Journal of Business Ethics, 142: 697–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T.2017. Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48: 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, J., & Pant, A.2010. The liabilities of origin: An emerging economy perspective on the costs of doing business abroad. Advances in International Management, 23: 231–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A.2019. China's challenge: Geopolitics, de-globalization, and the future of Chinese business. Management and Organization Review, 15(4): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A., Li, P. P., Välikangas, L., & Lewin, A. Y.2021. De-globalization and decoupling: Game changing consequences?Management and Organization Review, 17(1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar