Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:23:25.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Scholar's Quest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2018

James G. March
James G. March*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Modern portrayals of human action are overwhelmingly in a calculative and consequentialist tradition. Consequentialist reasoning is the basis for most of modern social and behavioral science and preeminently for economics. Action is seen as choice, and choice is seen as driven by anticipations, incentives, and desires. These ideas trace their roots at least to the Greeks, owe substantial parts of their modern manifestation to the formulations of Jeremy Bentham, and derive much of their contemporary power from the geniuses of L. J. Savage and John von Neumann.

Type
Dialogue, Debate, and Discussion
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 225 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

deCervantes, M. (1605). El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quixote de la Mancha (Vol. I).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1962). On Bentham and Coleridge. New York: Harper & Row. (Original Benham essay published 1838).Google Scholar